BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 55% saturation with 595 hits. Analysis detected 3,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,082 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.5% and a BS Rank of 66% (6,972 of 20,514 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the article peer group.

On June 23, democratic socialist Darializa Avila Chevalier defeated pro-Israel incumbent Rep. 
Adriano Espaillat by 4 percentage points in New York’s Thirteenth Congressional District. 
However, in the process of campaigning, Espaillat’s team leaned into a rather audacious strategy. 
It weaponized anti-blackness in a historically black area in an attempt to win. 
Ultimately, Espaillat’s camp failed, but its attempt reveals a broader strategy on the part of the Right to undermine socialist candidates. 
The vitriol was partially stoked by the National Black Empowerment Council (NBEC). 
It is part of a playbook of tactics that the NBEC has used before and will likely use again in the future. 
What Is the NBEC? 
The nebulously titled National Black Empowerment Council was established by former American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) alumnus Darius Jones in 2021. 
Jones specifically was the former national African American constituency director at AIPAC; his codirector, Richard St Paul, still serves on the committee’s national council. 
At the federal level, a key lobbyist of the group is Ja’Ron Smith of conservative lobbying firm CGCN. 
Smith was formerly the highest-ranking black aide to President Donald Trump. 
On the “priorities” landing page of the National Black Empowerment Action Fund (NBEAF), NBEC’s “sister organization,” a sparsely populated list is present. 
The three policy priorities are “Jobs and Economic Mobility,” “Educational Equity and Excellence,” and “Public Safety and Common-Sense Criminal Justice Reform.” 
The focus on all three issues does reflect recent polling on which issues matter the most to black American voters; however, the tangible policy proposals of the NBEAF are rather scant. 
For the economic mobility section, the description merely lists “good-paying jobs and generating economic activity in black communities” as the key objective, with no specific economic proposals. 
More recently, the NBEC also publicized an event in the heart of NY-13 focused on black economic empowerment in May, shortly before several inflammatory NBEAF-funded flyers were mailed to several constituents, myself included. 
For education, the objective is to “ensure Black children have access to excellent educational options that nurture their personal and intellectual development,” again with no specification for if those policies include better-funded public education or the favored conservative alternative of school-voucher programs. 
Furthermore, the use of the phrase “common sense policies” in the public safety section is followed by no substantive solutions for criminal justice reform. 
Interestingly, in a video introducing the work of the NBEC to a wider audience, Jones routinely discusses the importance of advancing a “model of advocacy” within the black community  one that reflects NBEC allies such as former New York City Mayor Eric Adams, who has been accused of corruption, and current Congressman Wesley Bell, AIPAC-backed challenger to former Rep. 
Cori Bush. 
During her 2024 race, Bush herself criticized the NBEAF for ties to AIPAC. 
It is evident that NBEC is primarily focused on increasing buy-in for their vision of a cohesive center-right black upper class of businesspeople, politicians, leaders in higher education, and more. 
It is a leadership class more concerned with creating a conservative base within the black upper class in support of Israel’s oppression of Palestine, starting at the college level. 
Expanded Partnerships With Israeli Universities 
Parsing through transcribed interviews from Jones in his capacity as the founder of the NBEC, his statements often center Israel. 
Rarely does Jones provide substantive breakdowns of solutions to the issues impacting the black community, such as the root causes of economic disempowerment or educational inequity. 
There are clear reasons for the NBEC’s obsessive focus on Israel. 
The lobby shares a significant portion of its donor overlap with AIPAC, especially donors also focused on higher education. 
Billionaire Daniel S. 
Loeb donated $100,000 to the NBEAF’s affiliated political action committee (PAC), known as the Empowering Black Americans PAC, in spring 2024. 
Loeb was one of several high-profile financiers caught in a WhatsApp chat with former Mayor Eric Adams urging Adams to deploy police onto Columbia University and the City College of New York’s campuses. 
Two 2025 posts on the NBEC’s Facebook page include the announcement of Texas State University’s nascent partnership with “leading institutions in Israel” as an act of diplomacy, paired with their publicization of a partnership between the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Ben-Gurion University in Beersheba, and eighteen historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs). 
At a time in which boycotts have sought to highlight what the academic Maya Wind has called Israeli universities’ “work on behalf of the Israeli state to counter international grassroots organizing for Palestinian rights” in the occupied territories and beyond, it is difficult to see how these partnership expansions are not just a form of indoctrination. 
Especially when they are aimed at HBCU campuses that have experienced administrative crackdowns against grassroots protests in solidarity with Palestine. 
NBEAF’s Impact on the 2026 Midterms Cycle 
The campaigning challenges that Chevalier faced were not unique. 
Former Rep. 
Cori Bush (D-MO) endured the same two years prior. 
In her widely spectated showdown against current Rep. 
Wesley Bell of Missouri’s First Congressional District, it was reported that AIPAC-affiliated mailers sent to in-district voters depicted Bush with an unusually large “jaw and forehead.” 
This was a blatant attempt to masculinize her image, a common trope used against black women. 
Similar racist tactics were used during current Rep. 
George Latimer’s challenge against former Congressmember Jamaal Bowman in New York’s Sixteenth Congressional District, where certain anti-Bowman campaign mailers allegedly darkened Bowman’s skin. 
In all cases, the racialized attacks on pro-Palestine candidates were primarily done in the name of protecting pro-Israel interests in Congress. 
For Jones, who is a self-proclaimed supporter of “social justice” for minority groups, such smears against black candidates who extend their vision of racial justice to Palestine seem rather contradictory to his organization’s mission of “empowering” the black community. 
While NBEC and its affiliates market themselves as aiding “Black families in living their life safely,” Jones’s operation willingly accepts monetary support from the same billionaires who enabled an influx of police into historically black Harlem in the name of squashing critics of Israel’s apartheid and genocide. 
The attempt to create a wedge between a generation of black Americans and the struggle for Palestinian liberation is motivated by a broader right-wing agenda. 
It is an agenda that will ultimately harms black Americans, since it is also opposed to the redistributive policies pushed by Bush, Chevalier, and others. 
In the words of Darius Jones himself, “Not all leaders who share racial identity prioritize the community’s needs.” 
The NBEC writ large is no exception. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 23.6%Jasmine Wynn: 17.7%Jacobin: 5.9%Confirmation Bias23.6%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.8%Jasmine Wynn: 4.3%Jacobin: 2.6%Availability Heuristic12.8%This article: 0.8%Jasmine Wynn: 0.2%Jacobin: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.8%This article: 2.7%Jasmine Wynn: 0.7%Jacobin: 1.8%Hindsight Bias2.7%This article: 0.6%Jasmine Wynn: 0.9%Jacobin: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.6%This article: 11.4%Jasmine Wynn: 8.6%Jacobin: 6.5%Framing Effect11.4%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.5%Jacobin: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Jasmine Wynn: 2.2%Jacobin: 1.9%Pessimism Bias6.5%This article: 55.0%Jasmine Wynn: 19.5%Jacobin: 8.0%Negativity Bias55.0%This article: 4.3%Jasmine Wynn: 1.1%Jacobin: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias4.3%This article: 3.6%Jasmine Wynn: 0.9%Jacobin: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error3.6%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Jasmine Wynn: 2.2%Jacobin: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 1.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 5.0%Jacobin: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Jasmine Wynn: 1.4%Jacobin: 0.4%Primacy Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Jasmine Wynn: 4.8%Jacobin: 1.6%Ad Hominem2.7%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.9%Jacobin: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.2%Jasmine Wynn: 3.1%Jacobin: 3.3%Appeal to Authority6.2%This article: 5.8%Jasmine Wynn: 3.7%Jacobin: 2.7%False Dilemma5.8%This article: 7.0%Jasmine Wynn: 2.8%Jacobin: 1.2%Slippery Slope7.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.2%Jasmine Wynn: 14.4%Jacobin: 8.3%Hasty Generalization13.2%This article: 7.4%Jasmine Wynn: 1.8%Jacobin: 0.2%Red Herring7.4%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.5%Jasmine Wynn: 2.6%Jacobin: 4.5%Appeal to Emotion5.5%This article: 8.0%Jasmine Wynn: 6.1%Jacobin: 1.7%Begging the Question8.0%This article: 15.7%Jasmine Wynn: 6.5%Jacobin: 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.7%This article: 7.9%Jasmine Wynn: 2.0%Jacobin: 0.3%Tu Quoque7.9%This article: 11.6%Jasmine Wynn: 2.9%Jacobin: 0.3%Burden of Proof11.6%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.6%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.9%Jasmine Wynn: 4.1%Jacobin: 2.6%Anecdotal8.9%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.9%Jasmine Wynn: 2.0%Jacobin: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.9%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 7.0%Jasmine Wynn: 4.2%Jacobin: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy7.0%This article: 1.7%Jasmine Wynn: 1.5%Jacobin: 1.4%Unattributed Quote1.7%This article: 1.7%Jasmine Wynn: 0.8%Jacobin: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 46.3%Jasmine Wynn: 40.1%Jacobin: 11.4%Biased Writer Voice46.3%This article: 12.2%Jasmine Wynn: 5.6%Jacobin: 3.3%Indoctrination12.2%This article: 24.8%Jasmine Wynn: 14.6%Jacobin: 7.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias24.8%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmine Wynn: 0.0%Jacobin: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1082 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers4.0%attributed speech1,039writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageNational Black Empowerment Council (NBEC) • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 60 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageCori Bush • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 56 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageDarius Jones • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
12 attributed words28% of attributed speech83% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+52.9 ptsWriter: 47.1%National Black Empowerment Council (NBEC): 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B-25.8 ptsWriter: 25.8%National Black Empowerment Council (NBEC): 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-12.7 ptsWriter: 12.7%National Black Empowerment Council (NBEC): 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.