3 Republicans break with Trump in US Senate vote to block war in Iran 36%

By Ashley Murray28%

7/30/2026, 4:08:11 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 766 faulty-reasoning hits from 538 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37% and a BS Rank of 36% (17,572 of 27,323 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON  For the second time in as many weeks, a War Powers Resolution aimed at curbing President Donald Trump’s war with Iran failed to pass the U.S. 
Senate Thursday. 
The vote breakdown, 49-50 , fell along familiar lines as previous War Powers votes, with Republican Sens. 
Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Susan Collins of Maine supporting the measure. 
Democratic Sen. 
John Fetterman of Pennsylvania voted no, as he’s done in just over a dozen similar measures. 
Sen. 
Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., continues to be absent while in medical rehab. 
A similar War Powers Resolution to rein in Trump’s military conflict in Iran passed in the U.S. 
House on July 23, but failed in the Senate  both led by Republican majorities. 
The regional war reignited yet again this week after Trump ordered retaliatory strikes Tuesday, along with Saudi Arabia’s armed forces, on Iran-backed militias in eastern Iraq. 
The strikes on “multiple terrorist logistics and weapons sites” were in response to Iranian drone attacks on U.S. forces in the region, according to U.S. 
Central Command. 
Trump told Fox News on Wednesday, “We are going to beat the f—– s—- out of them.” 
The United States launched a “heavy wave” of strikes on Iranian military sites beginning at 10 p.m. 
Eastern Wednesday “in response to yesterday’s attempted missile attacks on U.S. forces,” according to U.S. 
Central Command. 
The cost of oil jumped to just over $90 a barrel Wednesday in response to renewed fighting and a continued chokehold on traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, where one-fifth of the world’s petroleum traveled prior to the U.S. and Israel launching the war in late February. 
This means Americans are again paying more for fuel. 
According to AAA, the U.S. national average for a gallon of regular gasoline rose to $4.09 Thursday. 
Before the volley of strikes began again, Trump had announced a pause, after the U.S. and Iran traded rocket fire for nearly two weeks following the collapse of ceasefire talks . 
Service members killed 
The president on July 22 attended the dignified transfer, in which the remains of soldiers are transferred from an aircraft arriving from the theater of operations back to the United States, for four U.S. service members killed as a result of the conflict with Iran. 
Three of the service members were killed July 17 and July 18 in an Iranian strike at a U.S. airbase in Jordan, and a fourth was killed during a controlled detonation of an Iranian drone July 19 at a U.S. base in Iraq. 
The most recent deaths of U.S. soldiers in the conflict bring the total killed to 18, while the number of injured increased to 653. 
But the Pentagon does not recognize the four most recent deaths among those in the Iran war, dubbed by the administration as Operation Epic Fury. 
Instead, the Pentagon is categorizing the latest deaths and injuries as casualties of “overseas operations starting July 7, 2026.” 
The administration is asking Congress for an additional $67 billion for the war in Iran. 
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Senate appropriators July 21 that the war has already cost $37.5 billion. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 1.7%Daily Montanan: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Ashley Murray: 0.2%Daily Montanan: 0.3%Anchoring Bias6.3%This article: 16.7%Ashley Murray: 3.4%Daily Montanan: 2.6%Availability Heuristic16.7%This article: 3.2%Ashley Murray: 0.4%Daily Montanan: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic3.2%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.2%Daily Montanan: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.5%Daily Montanan: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 16.0%Ashley Murray: 4.6%Daily Montanan: 2.7%Framing Effect16.0%This article: 1.7%Ashley Murray: 0.6%Daily Montanan: 0.3%Loss Aversion1.7%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.4%Daily Montanan: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Ashley Murray: 0.1%Daily Montanan: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect2.8%This article: 5.8%Ashley Murray: 0.8%Daily Montanan: 1.7%Optimism Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.3%Daily Montanan: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 21.4%Ashley Murray: 5.4%Daily Montanan: 6.4%Negativity Bias21.4%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 2.8%Daily Montanan: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Ashley Murray: 1.0%Daily Montanan: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error2.0%This article: 3.5%Ashley Murray: 0.1%Daily Montanan: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 2.0%Daily Montanan: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.7%Daily Montanan: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.9%Daily Montanan: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.0%Daily Montanan: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.0%Daily Montanan: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.2%Ashley Murray: 1.8%Daily Montanan: 1.3%Recency Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.0%Daily Montanan: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.0%Daily Montanan: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 1.7%Daily Montanan: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.4%Daily Montanan: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.7%Ashley Murray: 1.9%Daily Montanan: 2.2%Appeal to Authority6.7%This article: 2.8%Ashley Murray: 0.5%Daily Montanan: 1.0%False Dilemma2.8%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.4%Daily Montanan: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.2%Daily Montanan: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 1.2%Daily Montanan: 2.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.2%Daily Montanan: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.0%Daily Montanan: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.5%Ashley Murray: 4.8%Daily Montanan: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion11.5%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.5%Daily Montanan: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 13.6%Ashley Murray: 1.4%Daily Montanan: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.6%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.5%Daily Montanan: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.6%Daily Montanan: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.0%Daily Montanan: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.0%Daily Montanan: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.0%Daily Montanan: 1.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.9%Daily Montanan: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.3%Ashley Murray: 0.8%Daily Montanan: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.3%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.0%Daily Montanan: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.0%Daily Montanan: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.2%Daily Montanan: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.2%Daily Montanan: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.3%Daily Montanan: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.2%Ashley Murray: 1.7%Daily Montanan: 1.5%Unattributed Quote3.2%This article: 3.2%Ashley Murray: 1.0%Daily Montanan: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection3.2%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 1.0%Daily Montanan: 1.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.4%Daily Montanan: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 0.0%Daily Montanan: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Murray: 1.4%Daily Montanan: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Ashley Murray: 0.2%Daily Montanan: 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.6%

538 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers20%attributed speech433writer words
Selected voice

Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
17 attributed words16% of attributed speech87% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.8 ptsWriter: 5.8%Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.