Dear Abby: My neighbor knocked on my door six times yesterday 45%

By Jeanne Phillips42%

7/30/2026, 12:59:40 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 811 faulty-reasoning hits from 521 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.6% and a BS Rank of 45% (15,957 of 28,846 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the article peer group.

DEAR ABBY: 
I moved into my apartment four months ago. 
While my sister, her son and I were moving things in, my new next-door neighbor introduced herself. 
She has since become intrusive. 
I am an introvert, and she knocks on my door wanting everything from plastic bags to cigarettes and alcohol. 
Every day since I moved here, she has been asking for something. 
She came six times yesterday. 
I’d like to be her friend, but she takes and I give. 
I’m tired. 
Help, please. 
 OVERWHELMED IN OHIO 
DEAR OVERWHELMED: 
A way to fix this would be to tell your neighbor the truth. 
Tell her you would like to be a considerate neighbor, but you are not a convenience store and do not wish to be disturbed on a daily basis. 
Then, when she comes around asking for cigarettes, liquor or plastic bags (which are choking our landfills and our waterways), tell her you are fresh out  and repeat it as necessary. 
If she persists, discuss it with the management of your apartment building. 
DEAR ABBY: 
I’m a 17-year-old guy, and I still suck my thumb, though I do it mostly when I’m in bed. 
I am going to college next year and I’m worried I might get outed by a roommate if I’m caught. 
Is my habit that unusual, and do you have any advice on how to stop it? 
It’s like an addiction. 
 EMBARRASSED IN THE WEST 
DEAR EMBARRASSED: 
You are not alone in having this problem. 
In the past, I have heard from other adults who suck their thumbs. 
Comfort yourself with the thought that it’s not an addiction and not all that unusual. 
Stress has been known to cause people to suck their thumbs. 
One way to discourage the habit would be to keep yourself from becoming overly tired. 
Another would be to coat your thumbs with a bad-tasting substance. 
(Search online or ask your pharmacist to recommend something.) 
That, coupled with the fear of being ridiculed, may do the trick. 
DEAR ABBY: 
My brother-in-law is currently in a relationship with a woman who was intimate with my husband many years before we married. 
It was a one-night thing, but now she is with my BIL and is going to be at family functions. 
I’m afraid it’s going to be awkward, and I’m not comfortable. 
DEAR DILEMMA: 
This is not a dilemma unless you choose to make it one. 
A one-night stand is not a relationship, and the woman is not a cause for concern. 
What happened between them once, many years ago before your marriage, shouldn’t be a threat to you or your relationship with your husband’s family. 
If anyone is tasteless enough to bring it up, treat it with humor or say you don’t wish to discuss it. 
Then act like the lady you are and be cordial. 
Dear Abby is written by Abigail Van Buren, also known as Jeanne Phillips, and was founded by her mother, Pauline Phillips. 
Contact Dear Abby at www.DearAbby.com or P.O. 
Box 69440, Los Angeles, CA 90069. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 2.1%East Bay Times: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Jeanne Phillips: 0.5%East Bay Times: 0.3%Anchoring Bias6.1%This article: 7.7%Jeanne Phillips: 1.9%East Bay Times: 2.2%Availability Heuristic7.7%This article: 2.9%Jeanne Phillips: 1.2%East Bay Times: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic2.9%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Jeanne Phillips: 0.8%East Bay Times: 0.3%Overconfidence Bias2.5%This article: 2.3%Jeanne Phillips: 2.1%East Bay Times: 2.9%Framing Effect2.3%This article: 2.3%Jeanne Phillips: 1.5%East Bay Times: 0.5%Loss Aversion2.3%This article: 7.3%Jeanne Phillips: 0.9%East Bay Times: 0.3%Status Quo Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.7%East Bay Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.5%Jeanne Phillips: 1.2%East Bay Times: 0.9%Optimism Bias7.5%This article: 5.8%Jeanne Phillips: 2.0%East Bay Times: 1.0%Pessimism Bias5.8%This article: 18.0%Jeanne Phillips: 4.9%East Bay Times: 5.6%Negativity Bias18.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 2.4%East Bay Times: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 2.2%East Bay Times: 1.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Jeanne Phillips: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.3%In-Group Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.5%East Bay Times: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.1%Jeanne Phillips: 0.7%East Bay Times: 0.6%Recency Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.7%Jeanne Phillips: 1.5%East Bay Times: 0.9%Appeal to Authority1.7%This article: 4.8%Jeanne Phillips: 1.7%East Bay Times: 0.9%False Dilemma4.8%This article: 2.3%Jeanne Phillips: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.4%Slippery Slope2.3%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 2.1%East Bay Times: 2.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.5%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Bandwagon1.5%This article: 8.8%Jeanne Phillips: 2.9%East Bay Times: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion8.8%This article: 2.9%Jeanne Phillips: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.3%Begging the Question2.9%This article: 2.1%Jeanne Phillips: 0.5%East Bay Times: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.1%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.1%Jeanne Phillips: 0.9%East Bay Times: 0.7%Burden of Proof3.1%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.4%Jeanne Phillips: 0.8%East Bay Times: 1.2%Anecdotal9.4%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.4%Jeanne Phillips: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.4%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.3%Jeanne Phillips: 2.8%East Bay Times: 4.6%Biased Writer Voice3.3%This article: 37.0%Jeanne Phillips: 10.5%East Bay Times: 3.4%Indoctrination37.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Jeanne Phillips: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.9%

521 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.