TechCrunch47%
SpaceX launches new V3 Starlink satellites but suffers another booster failure 29%
By Sean O'Kane21%
7/24/2026, 4:25:47 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 676 faulty-reasoning hits from 586 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.5% and a BS Rank of 29% (15,568 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the article peer group.
SpaceX successfully deployed the first third-generation Starlink satellites on Friday using an upgraded version of its prototype Starship — the 13th test flight of its mega-rocket to date.
But the company suffered another failure with its Super Heavy booster during a planned simulated landing in the Gulf of Mexico.
It’s the second time the company has had an issue with the Super Heavy booster on this V3 version of Starship.
In May, on the first Starship V3 flight, SpaceX encountered a failure of the Starship’s Super Heavy booster as it separated from the upper stage of the rocket.
SpaceX was able to perform a simulated landing of the upper stage of Starship during Friday’s launch after it deployed the Starlink satellites.
The launch came a little more than a week after SpaceX tried to conduct the 13th Starship launch.
That attempt had to abort immediately after ignition due to a number of rocket engine failures.
SpaceX said it replaced six engines ahead of Friday’s flight to fix the problem.
During Friday’s launch, the booster made it farther into its planned flight but wasn’t able to properly fire up all of the engines required for its simulated landing burn.
The booster exploded after a faster-than-expected impact with the water.
This was the first launch of Starship since SpaceX went public in June in the largest IPO in history.
In a test of SpaceX’s “fly, fail, fix” approach to Starship development, the company saw its stock decline last week in the day following the launch abort.
The dip is part of a larger downward trend since the IPO that has seen the company’s stock drop from a peak of more than $200 per share to $115 at the close of trading on Friday.
In after-hours trading, SpaceX shares fell another 2% following the booster failure, before paring some of those losses.
SpaceX had better luck with the Starship V3 upper stage during Friday’s launch.
The upper stage lost a rocket engine during the first V3 launch in May.
That didn’t happen this time around, as Starship encountered no issues on its way to deploying the new Starlinks.
The Ship, as the company calls it, was able to survive the harsh forces of atmospheric reentry and perform a simulated landing in the Indian Ocean roughly one hour after liftoff.
Unlike previous Starship missions, the Ship didn’t explode when it tipped over into the water.
The Ship instead floated around in the water, giving SpaceX a chance to use a drone to closely examine the heat shield tiles on its belly.
The new Starlink satellites burned up in the atmosphere roughly 20 minutes after deployment, as Starship still isn’t capable of reaching Earth orbit.
SpaceX was able to communicate with all of them while they were in space, marking a step forward for that program, which is the only profitable part of the company’s business.
The ability to deploy the more capable V3 Starlink satellites improves the economics of the company’s capital-hungry space internet network.
SpaceX has said launching 60 of the new satellites on Starship is a “potential twenty-fold increase” in downlink capacity deployed versus those flown by a single Falcon 9.
However, it’s not clear if SpaceX can realize those gains if Starship expends the Super Heavy booster rather than reusing it.
SpaceX’s S-1 said that without a fully-reusable Starship, progress on Starlink “would be at a slower pace and higher cost.”
With assistance from Tim Fernholz.
Speakers
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.