Visions: Black Jazz Records, Steve Lacy and more ⁠4%

By Kaleigh Wilder⁠2%

7/20/2026, 6:52:34 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Representativeness Heuristic, and Overconfidence Bias, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 346 faulty-reasoning hits from 270 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 11.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (28,364 of 29,510 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the article peer group.

On this episode of Visions , I primarily play music from the 1970’s. 
I have selections from several Black Jazz Records artists: Doug Carn , Walter Bishop, Jr. , Calvin Keys , and The Awakening . 
Black Jazz Records was a label that only released about twenty records between 1971 and 1975, and I’m still combing through their discography. 
I also play 70’s selections from Alice Coltrane , Herbie Hancock , and Bob James . 
I play 60’s selections from Sonny Clark and John Coltrane , and an 80’s cut from Steve Lacy . 
I play my new music discovery this week from Luke Titus Quintet , plus music from Nicholas Payton & Butcher Brown , and Irreversible Entanglements . 
Check out the playlist below and listen to the episode on-demand for two weeks after it airs using the media player above. 
Visions Playlist for July 20, 2026 
“Mode for D.D.” – The Awakening 
“All Blues” – Nicholas Payton & Butcher Brown 
“Naima (feat. 
Brian Sanborn, Lenard Simpson, Julius Tucker & Parker Grogan)” – Luke Titus 
“Criss Cross” – Calvin Keys 
“Epistrophy (feat. 
Steve Lacy, Steve Potts, Jean-Jacques Avenel & Oliver Johnson) [Live]” – Steve Lacy Four 
“Voodoo” – Sonny Clark 
“You’ll Know When You Get There” – Herbie Hancock 
“Little B’s Poem” – Doug Carn 
“Vigil (feat. 
Elvin Jones*)” – John Coltrane 
“Juntos Vencemos” – Irreversible Entanglements 
“Those Who Chant” – Walter Bishop, Jr. 
“Valley of the Shadows” – Bob James 
“Isis and Osiris (feat. 
Pharoah Sanders) [Live]” – Alice Coltrane* 
“Beloved California Temple” – Surya Botofasina 
* indicates Detroit artist 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 1.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 1.8%WDET: 0.3%Anchoring Bias7.0%This article: 8.5%Kaleigh Wilder: 2.1%WDET: 1.6%Availability Heuristic8.5%This article: 8.5%Kaleigh Wilder: 2.1%WDET: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic8.5%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Kaleigh Wilder: 2.1%WDET: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias8.5%This article: 8.1%Kaleigh Wilder: 2.0%WDET: 3.5%Framing Effect8.1%This article: 8.1%Kaleigh Wilder: 2.0%WDET: 0.7%Loss Aversion8.1%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Kaleigh Wilder: 2.1%WDET: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect8.5%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 2.6%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.4%WDET: 0.8%In-Group Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 3.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.6%Kaleigh Wilder: 2.4%WDET: 0.6%Recency Bias9.6%This article: 3.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.7%WDET: 0.3%Primacy Effect3.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.5%Kaleigh Wilder: 2.1%WDET: 1.9%Appeal to Authority8.5%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.5%Kaleigh Wilder: 2.1%WDET: 2.4%Hasty Generalization8.5%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.1%Kaleigh Wilder: 2.0%WDET: 2.8%Appeal to Emotion8.1%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.1%Kaleigh Wilder: 2.0%WDET: 0.3%Burden of Proof8.1%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 1.8%WDET: 0.1%Middle Ground7.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 8.1%Kaleigh Wilder: 2.0%WDET: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice8.1%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaleigh Wilder: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Kaleigh Wilder: 2.0%WDET: 5.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…8.1%

270 words analyzed.

Speakers

14speakers41%attributed speech160writer words
Selected voice

Steve Lacy Four

0%flagged-word coverage
16 attributed words15% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-13.8 ptsWriter: 13.8%Steve Lacy Four: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -13.8 ptsWriter: 13.8%Steve Lacy Four: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.