CNBC54%

Trump: U.S. should be reimbursed for guarding Strait of Hormuz 54%

By Kevin Breuninger15%

7/13/2026, 5:56:25 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Sunk Cost Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 346 faulty-reasoning hits from 138 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.2% and a BS Rank of 54% (10,186 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 53.50% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump on Monday said the U.S. is "going to get paid for guarding" the Strait of Hormuz, the major oil-shipping route and epicenter of the re-escalating war with Iran. 
"We're going to keep the strait, and we'll probably run it," Trump said in a phone interview with Fox News. 
"We'll become the guardian of the strait  maybe we'll call it the guardian angel of the strait," he said. 
"And we should be reimbursed for that." 
"We can't be expected to do that for nothing, unlike we had for many years," he added. 
"We guarded it for nothing, and now we're going to guard it, we're going to get paid for guarding it. 
A lot of money." 
This is developing news. 
Please check back for updates. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.5%Kevin Breuninger: 3.0%CNBC: 4.6%Confirmation Bias14.5%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.1%CNBC: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 1.4%CNBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.5%CNBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.4%CNBC: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 14.5%Kevin Breuninger: 5.7%CNBC: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias14.5%This article: 37.0%Kevin Breuninger: 4.1%CNBC: 6.5%Framing Effect37.0%This article: 5.1%Kevin Breuninger: 2.3%CNBC: 0.8%Loss Aversion5.1%This article: 12.3%Kevin Breuninger: 1.8%CNBC: 0.8%Status Quo Bias12.3%This article: 26.8%Kevin Breuninger: 1.5%CNBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect26.8%This article: 2.9%Kevin Breuninger: 0.3%CNBC: 7.7%Optimism Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 2.5%CNBC: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 22.5%Kevin Breuninger: 3.7%CNBC: 6.4%Negativity Bias22.5%This article: 5.1%Kevin Breuninger: 2.0%CNBC: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.3%CNBC: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 14.5%Kevin Breuninger: 0.4%CNBC: 2.9%Halo Effect14.5%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 1.1%CNBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 1.6%CNBC: 2.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 4.0%CNBC: 5.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.1%CNBC: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 4.5%CNBC: 4.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.4%CNBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 25.4%Kevin Breuninger: 4.5%CNBC: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion25.4%This article: 12.3%Kevin Breuninger: 3.2%CNBC: 0.7%Begging the Question12.3%This article: 14.5%Kevin Breuninger: 1.4%CNBC: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.5%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.9%CNBC: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 1.0%CNBC: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.5%CNBC: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.2%CNBC: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 1.0%CNBC: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 14.5%Kevin Breuninger: 1.7%CNBC: 2.5%Unattributed Quote14.5%This article: 2.9%Kevin Breuninger: 1.9%CNBC: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection2.9%This article: 22.5%Kevin Breuninger: 4.2%CNBC: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice22.5%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.8%CNBC: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 1.2%CNBC: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Breuninger: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Kevin Breuninger: 0.1%CNBC: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.6%

138 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker86%attributed speech19writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 31 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 20 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
119 attributed words100% of attributed speech47% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -26.3 ptsWriter: 26.3%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice+26.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 26.1%26.1%Quote-first Misdirection-21.1 ptsWriter: 21.1%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+16.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 16.8%16.8%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.