Sen. Mitch McConnell's hospitalization proves again that gerontocracy sucks 60%

By Ronald Bailey74%

7/10/2026, 7:55:53 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 816 faulty-reasoning hits from 392 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.8% and a BS Rank of 60% (8,898 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the article peer group.

"We have a sclerotic gerontocracy," posted then-48-year-old Rep. 
Ro Khanna (D–Calif.) back in 2024. 
Gerontocracy means rule by the old. 
And we Americans certainly are dominated by a cadre of elderly politicians. 
The U.S. 
Senate has the oldest average age of members for any directly elected upper legislative chamber in the world, according to the latest data compiled by the Inter-Parliamentary Union. 
The fact that Sen. 
Mitch McConnell (R–Ky.) has been hospitalized for nearly a month proves Khanna's point. 
The 84-year-old legislator suffered a serious health emergency and was hauled away in an ambulance from his Washington, D.C., residence on June 14. 
In his absence, already-feckless Congress is even more unproductive. 
Legislation proposed by the Senate's Republican leadership has remained stalled since McConnell's vote is necessary for its passage. 
While the former Senate Majority Leader may not be dead yet, bear in mind that eight of the 16 members of Congress who died in office since 2020 were over age 75 . 
Most notoriously, Sen. 
Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.) tottered along for years before dying at age 90 in 2023. 
The average age of U.S. senators is now around 65 , with 10 members aged 79 and older. 
Gerontocracy is demonstrably harmful for economic growth. 
As "a direct consequence of the obsolescence of their personal human capital," aged elites fail to "seize the opportunity offered by new technologies and to implement the best choice for the economy as a whole," according to a 2017 study in the Journal of Applied Economics . 
In a 2023 Pew Research Center poll, 79 percent of Americans favored setting maximum age limits for federal elected officials. 
In another Pew poll, only 3 percent of Americans favored having presidents in their 70s or older . 
Yet here we are. 
See my May 2025 Reason article, " Can America Get Out of the Gerontocracy Trap? 
" where I examined the problems and possible solutions to our sclerotic gerontocracy. 
Andy Serkis on Animal Farm , Authoritarianism, and Humanizing Monsters 
From the August/September 2026 issue 
John Fetterman Says He's 'Very Libertarian in a Lot of Ways' 
Dispatch From COGE: A Bureaucratic Meeting About Cutting Bureaucratic Bloat 
She Came to the U.S. at 4 Months Old. 
She Had To Self-Deport—Because She Came Here Legally. 
Sen. 
Mitch McConnell's Hospitalization Proves Again That Gerontocracy Sucks 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.6%Ronald Bailey: 8.3%Reason.com: 4.6%Confirmation Bias16.6%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 2.4%Reason.com: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.7%Ronald Bailey: 5.0%Reason.com: 2.4%Availability Heuristic11.7%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 3.0%Reason.com: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 2.9%Reason.com: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Ronald Bailey: 5.6%Reason.com: 6.4%Framing Effect4.6%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.9%Reason.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 5.1%Reason.com: 1.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Ronald Bailey: 1.8%Reason.com: 1.7%Pessimism Bias4.8%This article: 27.0%Ronald Bailey: 12.7%Reason.com: 8.0%Negativity Bias27.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 1.2%Reason.com: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.4%Reason.com: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 1.0%Reason.com: 0.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 1.2%Reason.com: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.9%Ronald Bailey: 3.2%Reason.com: 1.0%Recency Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.4%Reason.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 1.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 19.1%Ronald Bailey: 14.7%Reason.com: 3.9%Appeal to Authority19.1%This article: 4.6%Ronald Bailey: 2.9%Reason.com: 1.9%False Dilemma4.6%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.5%Ronald Bailey: 7.6%Reason.com: 6.5%Hasty Generalization11.5%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.1%Ronald Bailey: 0.9%Reason.com: 0.3%Bandwagon5.1%This article: 14.5%Ronald Bailey: 6.4%Reason.com: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion14.5%This article: 1.8%Ronald Bailey: 0.3%Reason.com: 1.4%Begging the Question1.8%This article: 9.7%Ronald Bailey: 2.2%Reason.com: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.7%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.4%Ronald Bailey: 2.2%Reason.com: 0.8%Burden of Proof8.4%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 12.0%Ronald Bailey: 3.0%Reason.com: 0.4%Composition/Division12.0%This article: 9.4%Ronald Bailey: 2.2%Reason.com: 1.8%Anecdotal9.4%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.5%Ronald Bailey: 0.3%Reason.com: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.5%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.8%Reason.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.6%Ronald Bailey: 0.6%Reason.com: 1.9%Unattributed Quote3.6%This article: 2.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.7%Reason.com: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection2.0%This article: 15.1%Ronald Bailey: 11.5%Reason.com: 10.0%Biased Writer Voice15.1%This article: 6.9%Ronald Bailey: 1.2%Reason.com: 1.5%Indoctrination6.9%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.7%Reason.com: 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ronald Bailey: 0.0%Reason.com: 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Ronald Bailey: 1.9%Reason.com: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.1%

392 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers36%attributed speech252writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageRo Khanna • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageInter-Parliamentary Union • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageJournal of Applied Economics • 47 words • 0.0% coveragePew Research Center • 20 words • 0.0% coveragePew Research Center • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Fetterman • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCOGE • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words34% of attributed speech80% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-23.4 ptsWriter: 23.4%Journal of Applied Economics: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.1 ptsWriter: 11.1%Journal of Applied Economics: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-10.7 ptsWriter: 10.7%Journal of Applied Economics: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%Journal of Applied Economics: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%Journal of Applied Economics: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.