Mexico's 2026 FIFA World Cup Legacy ⁠11%

By Catherine Osborn⁠19%

7/10/2026, 5:00:53 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 374 hits. Analysis detected 3,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,469 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (19,686 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the article peer group.

A one-stop weekly digest of politics, economics, technology, and culture in Latin America. 
Delivered Friday. 
What the World Cup Meant to Mexico 
The country is done hosting the tournament, but it will remember the “collective joy.” 
Osborn-Catherine-foreign-policy-columnist15 
By Catherine Osborn , the writer of Foreign Policy ’s weekly Latin America Brief. 
Mexican fans react as they watch a live broadcast of the 2026 FIFA World Cup soccer match between Mexico and the Czech Republic at the FIFA Fan Festival in Mexico City on June 24. 
Mexican fans react as they watch a live broadcast of the 2026 FIFA World Cup soccer match between Mexico and the Czech Republic at the FIFA Fan Festival in Mexico City on June 24. 
Claudia Rosel/AFP via Getty Images 
July 10, 2026, 8:00 AM 
FP’s guide to the 2026 tournament 
Welcome back to Foreign Policy ’s Latin America Brief. 
The highlights this week: Mexico makes a memorable exit from the World Cup , the United Nations debates U.S. sanctions on Cuba , and Colombia’s presidential transition falters. 
Mexico’s World Cup Hosting High 
Sunday night marked the grand finale of Mexico’s 2026 FIFA World Cup. 
The Mexican national team went out fighting in a 3-2 loss to England in what was also the last game of the tournament hosted on Mexican soil. 
For Mexican fans and visitors, the mood before and during the match was electric . 
Although many in the country had mixed feelings ahead of hosting the tournament , Mexico caught soccer fever as the national team delivered multiple victories without conceding a single goal, including its first win in a knockout stage game in 40 years. 
That June 30 match over Ecuador featured goals by stars JuliĂĄn Quiñones —a Black Colombian-born, naturalized Mexican who is changing the way the country thinks about national identity—and RaĂșl JimĂ©nez , who was back at elite performance following a life-threatening skull fracture in 2020. 
After the victory, more than a million people packed the streets of Mexico City. 
A catchphrase went viral among fans: “ ¿Y si sí? 
”—which roughly translates to “What if we can?” 
Though the prospect of Mexico winning the entire World Cup seemed slim, the expression was true to the optimism of the moment. 
The tournament “gave Mexico back the collective joy that it had been missing so much,” journalist Alejandro Domínguez wrote in Milenio . 
While ticket prices meant that spectators in the stadiums were disproportionately wealthy, “the streets, in contrast, served as the meeting point for everyone,” he wrote. 
International soccer critics gave similarly positive reviews of the atmosphere in Mexico. 
The Athletic ’s Jack Lang wrote that the games hosted in Mexico were “its best experience, its dislocated heart,” and that Mexico City’s historic Azteca Stadium “provided a blueprint for what big-tournament matches like [the Mexico-England game] should look like.” 
Despite some travelers’ worries, cartel violence in Mexico did not interrupt the tournament. 
More disruptive were activists denouncing forced disappearances and calling for higher wages; authorities generally allowed them to demonstrate but not immediately around stadiums. 
Another factor that failed to emerge at the World Cup was political unity between the three North American hosts. 
Instead, the Trump administration announced that it would trigger annual reviews of the three countries’ free trade deal, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA. 
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, who has responded calmly to U.S. 
President Donald Trump’s past provocations, dialed up her rhetoric against the United States in the last few weeks. 
She supported a bill that allows for election results to be overturned in cases of foreign interference and pledged legal action after the fatal shooting of a Mexican immigrant in Houston by a U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent. 
Sheinbaum’s response to Trump even drew a comparison with the Mexican national soccer team. 
Just as the Mexican squad shed its “‘colonial chip,’ the notion that we are condemned to lose,” author Jorge Zepeda Patterson wrote , the Mexican government has responded “firmly and unequivocally when the imbalance between the two countries threatened to turn into abuse.” 
Zepeda Patterson was referencing Mexico’s fierce style of play in its final game. 
Though Mexico lost on Sunday against England, it fought hard until the end of the match. 
Colombia similarly drew 0-0 against Switzerland in its Tuesday knockout game before losing in penalties—a more honorable exit than Brazil ’s 2-1 loss against Norway on Sunday. 
Meanwhile, Paraguay—which was eliminated from the tournament in a 1-0 loss to France on Saturday—continued to make headlines this week after a senator from the country launched a racist string of online attacks against French star Kylian MbappĂ©, prompting condemnation from both French President Emmanuel Macron and Paraguayan President Santiago Peña. 
There is only one Latin American team left standing: Argentina. 
Though the defending world champions played slowly at points in the tournament, they proved on Tuesday that they should not be written off, coming back from a 2-0 lead by Egypt and scoring three goals in 13 minutes. 
Saturday, July 11: Argentina plays Switzerland in the World Cup quarterfinals in Kansas City. 
Monday, July 13, to Friday, July 24: The International Seabed Authority convenes in Kingston, Jamaica, to negotiate rules for deep-sea mining. 
Tuesday, July 28: Keiko Fujimori is inaugurated as president of Peru. 
What We’re Following 
Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Eduardo Rodríguez Parrilla addresses the United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York on Sept. 
27, 2025. 
Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Eduardo Rodríguez Parrilla addresses the United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York on Sept. 
27, 2025. 
Charly Triballeau/AFP via Getty Images 
U.N. debate on Cuba. 
On Tuesday, the United Nations General Assembly held a debate on U.S. sanctions on Cuba at the request of the Cuban government. 
The assembly normally votes on condemning the sanctions once per year and last convened for that vote in October, but Havana said the meeting had become more urgent given Trump’s fuel embargo on the island. 
Cuba plunged into another nationwide blackout on Monday amid the embargo and long-standing problems with its energy grid. 
The United States vocally opposed Tuesday’s debate, calling it “whitewashing” of Cuban policies. 
U.N. member countries still voted 136-9 to move forward with it, with 30 abstentions. 
During the debate, countries largely criticized U.S. restrictions and called for dialogue and a normalization of relations between the United States and Cuba. 
But the event also showcased how Washington is chipping away at diplomatic support for Havana. 
Ahead of the gathering, U.S. 
Secretary of State Marco Rubio sent a cable to U.S. diplomats instructing them to urge host nations to object to the U.N. debate, Ken Klippenstein and the Nation reported . 
A few countries that abstained in Tuesday’s vote, such as Canada and Germany, have voted to condemn U.S. sanctions on Cuba in the past. 
Bolsonaro’s tariff appeal. 
Brazilian presidential candidate Flávio Bolsonaro—the son of former President Jair Bolsonaro—made an unusual appearance in Washington on Tuesday, testifying in person at an Office of the U.S. 
Trade Representative hearing over whether the United States should impose fresh 25 percent tariffs on Brazilian goods. 
Trump’s 50 percent tariffs on Brazil last year followed meetings with the Bolsonaro political clan, who urged the United States to punish Brazil for prosecuting Jair Bolsonaro on coup charges. 
But on Tuesday, Flåvio Bolsonaro came out against additional U.S. tariffs, saying they had politically benefited his opponents and pushed Brazil closer to China. 
President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s administration opposes the potential new tariffs, too, though it sent a written statement for the hearing rather than a representative to testify. 
Bolsonaro’s presence reflected how intertwined domestic and foreign policy have become in the U.S.-Brazil relationship. 
Colombia’s turbulent transition. 
Outgoing Colombian President Gustavo Petro has refused to recognize far-right politician Abelardo de la Espriella’s victory in last month’s election, prompting de la Espriella to announce on Tuesday that his team would stop attending transitional meetings with Petro’s government. 
International monitors reported no fraud in the election. 
Ivan CepĂ©da, the defeated left-wing candidate, recognized the results but threatened “civil disobedience” if de la Espriella does not renounce his U.S. citizenship. 
De la Espriella became a naturalized U.S. citizen after living in Miami for several years. 
Petro’s rhetoric echoes that of other Latin American leaders who have refused to recognize defeat, including Jair Bolsonaro. 
It also strikes a contrast with Peru, where losing left-wing presidential candidate Roberto Sånchez conceded defeat to right-wing Keiko Fujimori on Monday after election results were certified. 
Question of the Week 
For how many consecutive years has the U.N. 
General Assembly passed a resolution condemning U.S. sanctions on Cuba? 
(This tally excludes 2020, when voting did not occur.) 
The first such vote occurred in 1992, after Washington intensified sanctions on the island. 
The United States began its trade embargo on Cuba in 1960. 
FP’s Most Read This Week 
The Strategy Behind the Battle for Crimea by Paul Hockenos 
War Has Become Pointless by Stephen M. 
Walt 
Israel Belongs in the New Saudi-Iranian Order by Trita Parsi 
In Focus: Shifting Investment Trends 
A crane lifts a container at Puerto Antioquia in the Gulf of Uraba, Colombia, on Nov. 
8, 2025. 
A crane lifts a container at Puerto Antioquia in the Gulf of Uraba, Colombia, on Nov. 
8, 2025. 
Luis Acosta/AFP via Getty Images 
A new U.N. report on foreign direct investment in Latin America and the Caribbean last year suggests that Trump’s tariffs and the region’s search for economic partners other than the United States may have economic consequences. 
U.S. investment in Latin America was down 11 percent, while it grew from other sources, particularly European countries. 
Saudi investors continued to purchase Latin American assets, a recent trend that followed the Saudi sovereign wealth fund’s first large-scale Latin American investment conference in Brazil in 2024. 
“The recent years have been a moment where Brazil and its companies have been thinking a little bit more about the world,” said Rodrigo Santiago of the Federation of Industries of Rio de Janeiro. 
“They are looking to see how to improve trade with traditional partners but also with new markets that could better enhance their resilience to this fluctuating geopolitics.” 
In a handful of countries, the U.N. 
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean report also revealed sharp changes in FDI levels from 2024 to 2025. 
As Bolivia experienced a pro-market turn under President Rodrigo Paz, FDI there roughly doubled. 
In Ecuador, under right-wing President Daniel Noboa, it nearly tripled. 
But the changes didn’t always map onto party lines: In Javier Milei’s Argentina, FDI shrank by almost three-fourths. 
It has been steadily falling after an initial boom of enthusiasm in 2023, the year that Milei was elected. 
The consequences of Trump’s tariffs for the region depend on the type of economic activity. 
Despite the fall in U.S. investment in the region, Latin America’s overall exports to the United States continued a longtime growth trend in 2025, according to the Inter-American Development Bank. 
Early 2026 numbers show that is changing in some countries, with Brazil’s U.S. exports falling sharply. 
China is their new destination . 
Catherine Osborn is the writer of Foreign Policy ’s weekly Latin America Brief. 
She is a print and radio journalist based in Rio de Janeiro. 
X: @cculbertosborn 
Why We Know More About China’s Next-Generation Fighters Than America’s 
Ukraine Finally Has a Theory of Victory. 
Will It Work? 
Marco Rubio Burned Down the House to Fix a Sink 
Why Netanyahu Is Crying Wolf on Turkey 
As the Tide Turns Against Putin, Beware the Drowning Man 
The Strategy Behind the Battle for Crimea 
Why Israel's Netanyahu Is Crying Wolf on Turkey 
What the Internet Reveals About China’s Next-Generation Fighter Jets 
Ankara NATO Summit Leaves Big Trump Questions for Europe 
U.S., Iran Intensify Strikes After Cease-Fire Collapse 
Negotiators from the United States, Canada, and five European countries converse after finishing the draft of the North Atlantic Treaty in Washington on March 18, 1949. 
Trans-Atlanticism Isn’t Dead—It’s Being Renegotiated 
Alexandra de Hoop Scheffer 
An illustration of a vintage-style map featuring North America and parts of Europe and Africa. 
Overlaid on the map are 3D red brick walls shaped exactly like the borders of the contiguous United States and Alaska, casting long shadows to the right. 
America, the Once Global Nation 
A painting depicts Roosevelt on horseback, his right hand raising a sword in the air as he leads a cavalry charge of other U.S. soldiers on horseback. 
The horses' eyes are wide and bulging with fear, and there are scattered starbursts around the scene indicating artillery fire. 
How to Spin an Empire 
An illustration showing a pair of hands tightly wringing out an American flag. 
Water droplets shaped like missiles squeeze out of the twisted fabric and fall toward a puddle shaped like the map of Iran on a red background. 
U.S. 
Power Is Wrung Out 
A rocket is seen from a great distance, flying through a deep blue sky during military drills. 
Several parallel plumes of smoke are seen alongside the rocket's path. 
Missile Defense Worked Against Iran. 
It Might Not Work Against China. 
A creative illustration against a pale yellow background showing a garden planter containing a dense green hedge. 
Five human arms emerge from the hedge, with four of the hands holding small flags of China, Russia, the United States, and the European Union, while the fifth hand holds the flag of India. 
Hedging Is the New Normal 
Republican presidential nominee, former President Donald Trump pumps his fist as he walks off stage at the end of a campaign rally at the Santander Arena on November 04, 2024 in Reading, Pennsylvania. 
The End of America’s Soft Power 
Central Military Commission Vice Chairman Zhang Shengmin raises his right hand in a salute to Chinese President Xi Jinping, who is walking a level lower in a red-carpeted auditorium. 
The Deeper Pattern Behind China’s Military Purges 
An aerial photo shows Doha in the booming petrostate of Qatar. 
For What AI Could Do to Democracies, Look to the Petrostates 
Zelensky and Rutte walk beside one another. 
Rutte is smiling and gesturing in a welcoming manner toward Zelensky. 
Why This Year’s NATO Summit Is Different for Ukraine 
Ukraine’s ambassador to the United States breaks it down in a new interview. 
Billboards with the slogans “Key to Peace,” “Key to Security,” and “Shared Future in Peace”, displayed along the boulevard on the protocol route ahead of the NATO Summit in Ankara, on 26 June. 
Can NATO Pull Off a Dull Summit? 
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, France's President Emmanuel Macron, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at the start of the E-3 meeting during the 62nd Munich Security Conference on February 13, 2026 in Munich, Germany. 
Europe Is Struggling to Lead NATO 
A pharmacy sign displays the temperature of 44 degrees Celsius in Brussels. 
NATO’s New Enemy Is the Thermometer 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.2%Catherine Osborn: 2.5%Foreign Policy: 3.4%Confirmation Bias3.2%This article: 0.4%Catherine Osborn: 0.4%Foreign Policy: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.4%This article: 2.3%Catherine Osborn: 2.0%Foreign Policy: 2.6%Availability Heuristic2.3%This article: 4.7%Catherine Osborn: 1.2%Foreign Policy: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic4.7%This article: 3.3%Catherine Osborn: 0.5%Foreign Policy: 0.9%Hindsight Bias3.3%This article: 1.4%Catherine Osborn: 0.7%Foreign Policy: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias1.4%This article: 6.5%Catherine Osborn: 7.4%Foreign Policy: 5.0%Framing Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.1%Catherine Osborn: 0.4%Foreign Policy: 0.3%Status Quo Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%Catherine Osborn: 1.9%Foreign Policy: 1.8%Optimism Bias3.8%This article: 1.4%Catherine Osborn: 1.9%Foreign Policy: 2.9%Pessimism Bias1.4%This article: 10.8%Catherine Osborn: 7.7%Foreign Policy: 7.9%Negativity Bias10.8%This article: 1.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.4%Foreign Policy: 0.5%Self-Serving Bias1.0%This article: 2.3%Catherine Osborn: 0.7%Foreign Policy: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error2.3%This article: 1.1%Catherine Osborn: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias1.1%This article: 1.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.6%Foreign Policy: 0.7%In-Group Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.3%Foreign Policy: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 15.1%Catherine Osborn: 1.8%Foreign Policy: 1.7%Halo Effect15.1%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.6%Catherine Osborn: 1.3%Foreign Policy: 1.3%Recency Bias0.6%This article: 0.4%Catherine Osborn: 0.4%Foreign Policy: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.4%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.4%Foreign Policy: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.9%Catherine Osborn: 3.0%Foreign Policy: 2.9%Appeal to Authority11.9%This article: 1.6%Catherine Osborn: 1.3%Foreign Policy: 1.7%False Dilemma1.6%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 1.0%Foreign Policy: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.0%Catherine Osborn: 2.9%Foreign Policy: 4.9%Hasty Generalization4.0%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.4%Catherine Osborn: 1.7%Foreign Policy: 2.7%Appeal to Emotion2.4%This article: 0.4%Catherine Osborn: 0.7%Foreign Policy: 0.8%Begging the Question0.4%This article: 10.0%Catherine Osborn: 3.9%Foreign Policy: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.0%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.6%Foreign Policy: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.7%Catherine Osborn: 0.3%Foreign Policy: 0.3%Composition/Division0.7%This article: 3.2%Catherine Osborn: 0.8%Foreign Policy: 1.2%Anecdotal3.2%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.7%Catherine Osborn: 1.8%Foreign Policy: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.7%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.6%Catherine Osborn: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Middle Ground0.6%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.0%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.1%Foreign Policy: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.2%Catherine Osborn: 2.3%Foreign Policy: 1.8%Unattributed Quote5.2%This article: 0.6%Catherine Osborn: 0.9%Foreign Policy: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.6%This article: 14.2%Catherine Osborn: 2.7%Foreign Policy: 5.4%Biased Writer Voice14.2%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.5%Foreign Policy: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.3%Foreign Policy: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catherine Osborn: 0.2%Foreign Policy: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Catherine Osborn: 0.3%Foreign Policy: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S
0.9%

2469 words analyzed.

Speakers

17speakers22%attributed speech1,914writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice ‱ 6 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 13 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 2 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 7 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 14 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 1 words ‱ 0.0% coverageCatherine Osborn ‱ 14 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 34 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 34 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 5 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 5 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 6 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 9 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 28 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 5 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 12 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 27 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 15 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 42 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 44 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 14 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 10 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 8 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 22 words ‱ 100.0% coverageAlejandro DomĂ­nguez ‱ 22 words ‱ 0.0% coverageAlejandro DomĂ­nguez ‱ 25 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 12 words ‱ 0.0% coverageJack Lang ‱ 40 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 13 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 23 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 19 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 24 words ‱ 0.0% coverageClaudia Sheinbaum ‱ 10 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 18 words ‱ 0.0% coverageClaudia Sheinbaum ‱ 34 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 5 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 14 words ‱ 100.0% coverageJorge Zepeda Patterson ‱ 43 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 13 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 16 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 27 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 51 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 10 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 38 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 14 words ‱ 0.0% coverageInternational Seabed Authority ‱ 21 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 11 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 3 words ‱ 0.0% coverageBruno Eduardo RodrĂ­guez Parrilla ‱ 21 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 2 words ‱ 0.0% coverageBruno Eduardo RodrĂ­guez Parrilla ‱ 21 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 2 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 5 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 4 words ‱ 0.0% coverageUnited Nations General Assembly ‱ 22 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 35 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 18 words ‱ 0.0% coverageUnited States ‱ 13 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 14 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 23 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 15 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 5 words ‱ 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio ‱ 30 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 24 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 3 words ‱ 0.0% coverageFlĂĄvio Bolsonaro ‱ 27 words ‱ 100.0% coverageOffice of the U.S. Trade Representative ‱ 17 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 30 words ‱ 0.0% coverageFlĂĄvio Bolsonaro ‱ 24 words ‱ 0.0% coverageLuiz InĂĄcio Lula da Silva’s administration ‱ 28 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 15 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 3 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 39 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 8 words ‱ 0.0% coverageIvan CepĂ©da ‱ 23 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 15 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 18 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 27 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 4 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 8 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 10 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 9 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 14 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 11 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 5 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 10 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 7 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 1 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 10 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 5 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 16 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 2 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 16 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 2 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 5 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 36 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 18 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 28 words ‱ 0.0% coverageRodrigo Santiago ‱ 34 words ‱ 0.0% coverageRodrigo Santiago ‱ 27 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 7 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 20 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 14 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 10 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 18 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 19 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 15 words ‱ 100.0% coverageInter-American Development Bank ‱ 30 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 16 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 6 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 13 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 12 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 2 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 10 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 7 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 3 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 10 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 7 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 10 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 7 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 8 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 9 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 9 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 7 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 26 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 5 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 4 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 15 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 27 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 5 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 27 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 20 words ‱ 100.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 5 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 13 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 26 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 1 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 4 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 17 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 11 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 5 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 6 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 17 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 34 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 5 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 33 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 6 words ‱ 0.0% coverageZhang Shengmin ‱ 29 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 7 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 11 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 11 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 7 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 11 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 9 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 13 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 33 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 7 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 34 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 6 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 12 words ‱ 0.0% coverageWriter's voice ‱ 6 words ‱ 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Rodrigo Santiago

100%flagged-word coverage
61 attributed words11% of attributed speech61% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-14.3 ptsWriter: 14.3%Rodrigo Santiago: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.9 ptsWriter: 3.9%Rodrigo Santiago: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-0.7 ptsWriter: 0.7%Rodrigo Santiago: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -0.5 ptsWriter: 0.5%Rodrigo Santiago: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading

Loading

Loading

Loading


Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.