Quillette64%

The Great Canadian Unmarked-Graves Social Panic (2021–2026) 76%

By Jonathan Kay96%

6/23/2026, 5:36:38 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 56.1% saturation with 192 hits. Analysis detected 1,105 faulty-reasoning hits from 342 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68% and a BS Rank of 76% (5,259 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the article peer group.

Today is one of those days when I'm going to be turning the mic around and taking on the role of guest instead of host. 
The background here is that last month I was interviewed by Mia Hughes and Stella O'Malley of the Beyond Gender podcast, and with their permission, I've adapted some of the material from that lengthy episode for Quillette listeners and YouTube viewers. 
As you'll hear, the interview took place on May 28th, which is one day after the fifth anniversary of the start of Canada's infamous unmarked graves social panic. 
As many of you will know, that was the lengthy hysteria that followed false reports that the bodies of two hundred and fifteen Indigenous children had supposedly been found on the grounds of a former residential school in Kamloops, British Columbia. 
It's taken years for Canadian media outlets such as the CBC and Globe and Mail to finally admit that many journalists got taken in by a fake story, and in the interim, much of the country more or less fell to pieces. 
As we'll discuss, this is just one of several ways in which Canada lapsed into a tragicomic form of radical social progressivism under the tenure of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who a year and a half ago was replaced by a more hard-headed incumbent named Mark Carney. 
Under Carney, Canada now steers a more centrist course, but Trudeau's social justice spirit still lingers on in Canada through our activist and cultural institutions, which isn't great news for our international reputation. 
But it's good news for someone like me who enjoys satirising the inanities of Canadian public life for an international audience. 
Now, just to situate you so you can make sense of the accents: Mia is the Ottawa-based half of Beyond Gender, but she's originally from the UK. 
Stella is based in Ireland, and as usual, I'm speaking to you from Toronto. 
Please enjoy my appearance on the Beyond Gender Podcast with Mia Hughes and Stella O'Malley. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.0%Jonathan Kay: 7.7%Quillette: 5.9%Confirmation Bias12.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.0%Quillette: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.3%Jonathan Kay: 5.1%Quillette: 3.4%Availability Heuristic12.3%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 1.1%Quillette: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 8.2%Jonathan Kay: 3.8%Quillette: 1.6%Hindsight Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 3.3%Quillette: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Jonathan Kay: 22.3%Quillette: 7.5%Framing Effect10.2%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.3%Quillette: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.7%Quillette: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.0%Quillette: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.2%Quillette: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Jonathan Kay: 0.8%Quillette: 1.4%Pessimism Bias9.6%This article: 40.4%Jonathan Kay: 20.2%Quillette: 9.3%Negativity Bias40.4%This article: 6.1%Jonathan Kay: 1.3%Quillette: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 4.6%Quillette: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.2%Quillette: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 3.2%Quillette: 1.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 2.5%Quillette: 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Jonathan Kay: 1.5%Quillette: 2.3%Halo Effect9.6%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.2%Quillette: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.0%Quillette: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 2.2%Quillette: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 1.0%Quillette: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.1%Quillette: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 11.4%Quillette: 2.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 5.2%Quillette: 2.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 7.5%Quillette: 5.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 14.0%Jonathan Kay: 2.0%Quillette: 2.9%False Dilemma14.0%This article: 14.0%Jonathan Kay: 2.1%Quillette: 1.3%Slippery Slope14.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.4%Quillette: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 33.9%Jonathan Kay: 12.5%Quillette: 9.1%Hasty Generalization33.9%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.9%Quillette: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 1.0%Quillette: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.0%Jonathan Kay: 5.3%Quillette: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion12.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 2.1%Quillette: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.2%Jonathan Kay: 2.6%Quillette: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.2%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.0%Quillette: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 2.3%Quillette: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 1.0%Quillette: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 9.6%Jonathan Kay: 0.5%Quillette: 0.7%Composition/Division9.6%This article: 12.3%Jonathan Kay: 6.0%Quillette: 3.2%Anecdotal12.3%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.4%Quillette: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.0%Jonathan Kay: 3.5%Quillette: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.0%Quillette: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.3%Quillette: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.3%Quillette: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 1.2%Quillette: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 1.9%Quillette: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.3%Jonathan Kay: 3.4%Quillette: 2.3%Unattributed Quote12.3%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 1.8%Quillette: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 56.1%Jonathan Kay: 35.7%Quillette: 13.8%Biased Writer Voice56.1%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 1.1%Quillette: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jonathan Kay: 0.0%Quillette: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 23.7%Jonathan Kay: 4.5%Quillette: 1.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias23.7%This article: 16.4%Jonathan Kay: 0.7%Quillette: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…16.4%

342 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.