ICE Rushes to Deport Palestinian Grandpa Despite Judge’s Order to Free Him 49%

By Delaney Nolan0% Evelyn Ronan0%

6/10/2026, 10:37:09 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 42.8% saturation with 503 hits. Analysis detected 1,889 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,174 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (10,579 of 20,441 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the article peer group.

Less than two weeks ago, in a scathing rebuke, a federal judge ordered U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement to release a Louisiana grandfather who’d suffered a heart attack while in ICE custody. 
The man, Akram Mahmoud Omar, 77, lived in the U.S. for 50 years until ICE abruptly seized him during a routine check-in last October and soon sent him to “Camp 57,” the ICE detention camp within the notorious Angola, Louisiana, state prison. 
The stress of the poor conditions there contributed to Omar’s heart attack, according to the habeas petition he filed in April. 
On May 29, a federal judge found ICE had violated Omar’s constitutional rights and ordered his immediate release. 
Then on Monday, just 10 days after his release, ICE seized Omar again and tried to whisk the still-recovering man onto a deportation flight the next morning, according to his lawyer Ken Mayeaux. 
Following an emergency motion from Mayeaux, the same judge again ordered ICE to release Omar and cautioned the agency not to make another deportation attempt. 
“U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (‘ICE’) shall IMMEDIATELY RELEASE Omar from ICE custody,” said the Monday order from Judge Brian Jackson in Louisiana’s Middle District. 
“ICE shall not RE-DETAIN or REMOVE Omar from the United States during the pendency of Omar’s Emergency Motion to Enforce the Court’s May 29 Order.” 
In the May order, the judge found that ICE had violated Omar’s constitutional rights by unlawfully detaining him and denying him the chance to prepare for an orderly departure. 
ICE directly defied that order by seizing him without warning for immediate deportation, the emergency motion alleges, blocking him from arranging his affairs or even saying goodbye. 
“Petitioner’s re-detention and planned removal are in direct contempt of this Court’s prior order,” reads the June 8 emergency motion. 
The government “lied to Mr. 
Omar, telling him and his family that he did not need to report to ICE/ERO”  ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations division  “until December, but now, Respondent is racing to remove petitioner within hours.” 
In a statement to The Lens and The Intercept, ICE spokesperson Angelina Vicknair said, “ICE complies with all court orders, and any allegation that a judge’s orders were not followed are categorically false. 
” 
Federal courts are now constantly dealing with flagrant violations of judicial orders by ICE, said Bridget Pranzatelli, an attorney with the National Immigration Project. 
“This level of cruelty and disrespect for federal courts is the rule, not the exception,” said Pranzatelli, who is familiar with the case. 
“The Court looked at the entire record before it and issued a well-reasoned decision, which specifically mandated certain protections for this very elderly, very sick man, and ICE ignored it.” 
ICE’s actions in Omar’s case are also in line with the way that the government is using extreme measures to target Palestinians, Pranzatelli said. 
Omar was born in Palestine before the formation of the state of Israel; in 1975, he moved to the U.S. as a lawful permanent resident. 
<strong>“If In Fact He Survives the Flight”</strong> 
After his release last month, Omar attended his regular ICE check-in on the first Wednesday in June; his next check-in would be in December, he was told. 
But last Friday, he received a letter telling him to report to an ICE office on Monday morning, June 8. 
After Omar received the letter, Mayeaux emailed the ICE office in Bossier City, Louisiana, where Omar lives, warning immigration officials that “any attempted removal of Mr. 
Omar in June would be in direct contempt of the Court Order,” according to a copy of the email included with the motion. 
“I am instructing my client not to report as requested.” 
Instead, on Monday, ICE came to Omar’s home and arrested him again. 
Omar’s wife immediately called Mayeaux. 
Only hours later did ICE tell Omar’s family he was being deported and would be put on a plane the next morning to Israel. 
By early afternoon, Mayeux had filed the emergency motion. 
His client’s health, Mayeux wrote in the emergency motion, was his main concern. 
Omar is still recovering from his April heart attack and open-heart surgery. 
His wife told the arresting ICE officer that she was planning to take Omar to a cardiologist later that day, and that he could not move well. 
According to the filing, a doctor was prepared to testify that the roughly 14-hour flight without medical clearance raised serious concerns about Omar’s health, “if in fact he survives the flight.” 
<strong>“Heartless and Cruel”</strong> 
Omar had been in the U.S. for half a century when ICE picked him up in Mississippi during a routine check-in last fall. 
There was no readily apparent cause: ICE had long known about two minor, nonviolent convictions, one in 2005 and one in 2022, but Omar had lived in the U.S. for years under ICE supervision and had complied with required immigration check-ins. 
“Incredibly, despite these undisputed facts, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (‘ICE’) considers Omar to be both a ‘flight risk’ and a ‘priority for removal,” said the May release order from Jackson, a federal judge in Baton Rouge. 
“Omar has been held in ICE detention since October 28, 2025  7 full months  with no end in sight.” 
Jackson ruled that ICE had to abide by its own regulations: If ICE were to deport him, the agency needed to give him advance notice, a reason, an opportunity for an orderly departure, and an informal interview to respond to ICE’s deportation efforts. 
ICE did not serve Omar’s counsel with notice until he was already back in ICE custody. 
“The Notice also makes a mockery of the Court’s Order,” says Mayeaux’s June 8 emergency motion. 
“It was only after he was taken back into custody  in contravention of the Court’s Order  that he was informed of the existence of the travel document and of his imminent removal.” 
But even at that point, the motion alleged, ICE didn’t give Omar the chance to speak directly with counsel. 
The court had also directed ICE to facilitate communication with Omar’s doctors and family “to ensure the most efficient and effective continuation of his required medical treatment upon his release.” 
ICE appears to have violated most of Jackson’s orders when its agents re-detained Omar. 
Even when ICE SUVs showed up at his door to bring him to the Bossier City field office, the agents continued to say that it was only a routine check-in. 
Not until less than 24 hours before the flight was scheduled to depart were family members told he was being deported. 
Again, an order from Jackson mandated Omar’s immediate release. 
ICE agents returned him to his home around 7 p.m. 
Monday evening  leaving his family relieved, but shaken. 
“They’re all completely traumatized,” Mayeaux said of his client’s family. 
While ICE’s letter last week had made him suspicious, he said, “I couldn’t believe they would be so heartless and cruel as to do this to a 77-year-old man who’s ill. 
I just didn’t.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.4%Delaney Nolan: 4.8%The Intercept: 5.2%Confirmation Bias14.4%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Delaney Nolan: 2.0%The Intercept: 3.0%Availability Heuristic6.0%This article: 7.1%Delaney Nolan: 2.4%The Intercept: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic7.1%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 1.0%The Intercept: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Delaney Nolan: 11.9%The Intercept: 9.3%Framing Effect2.8%This article: 0.9%Delaney Nolan: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.9%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Delaney Nolan: 1.8%The Intercept: 2.2%Pessimism Bias5.3%This article: 42.8%Delaney Nolan: 20.0%The Intercept: 12.5%Negativity Bias42.8%This article: 2.8%Delaney Nolan: 0.9%The Intercept: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 1.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.7%The Intercept: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Delaney Nolan: 0.9%The Intercept: 1.0%Halo Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%Delaney Nolan: 1.3%The Intercept: 1.3%Recency Bias3.8%This article: 2.1%Delaney Nolan: 0.7%The Intercept: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.4%Delaney Nolan: 0.1%The Intercept: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.4%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.6%Delaney Nolan: 2.7%The Intercept: 3.5%Appeal to Authority5.6%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 2.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 3.7%Delaney Nolan: 1.2%The Intercept: 0.1%Circular Reasoning3.7%This article: 9.5%Delaney Nolan: 7.2%The Intercept: 7.2%Hasty Generalization9.5%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.3%Delaney Nolan: 11.8%The Intercept: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion14.3%This article: 2.9%Delaney Nolan: 1.0%The Intercept: 1.4%Begging the Question2.9%This article: 2.0%Delaney Nolan: 1.3%The Intercept: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.4%Delaney Nolan: 1.5%The Intercept: 0.8%Burden of Proof4.4%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.9%Delaney Nolan: 0.3%The Intercept: 2.3%Anecdotal0.9%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.5%Delaney Nolan: 2.1%The Intercept: 2.1%Unattributed Quote5.5%This article: 1.4%Delaney Nolan: 1.0%The Intercept: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 16.7%Delaney Nolan: 12.0%The Intercept: 10.7%Biased Writer Voice16.7%This article: 0.9%Delaney Nolan: 0.3%The Intercept: 2.1%Indoctrination0.9%This article: 2.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.7%The Intercept: 6.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Delaney Nolan: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1174 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers31%attributed speech807writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKen Mayeaux • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageBrian Jackson • 24 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Jackson • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageAngelina Vicknair • 33 words • 0.0% coverageAngelina Vicknair • 1 words • 0.0% coverageBridget Pranzatelli • 24 words • 100.0% coverageBridget Pranzatelli • 23 words • 0.0% coverageBridget Pranzatelli • 30 words • 100.0% coverageBridget Pranzatelli • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKen Mayeaux • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKen Mayeaux • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageKen Mayeaux • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageBrian Jackson • 36 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Jackson • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageKen Mayeaux • 10 words • 0.0% coverageKen Mayeaux • 31 words • 0.0% coverageKen Mayeaux • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bridget Pranzatelli

100%flagged-word coverage
101 attributed words28% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Biased Writer Voice+40.0 ptsWriter: 13.5%Bridget Pranzatelli: 53.5%53.5%Politically Left Leaning B+23.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Bridget Pranzatelli: 23.8%23.8%Unattributed Quote-7.9 ptsWriter: 7.9%Bridget Pranzatelli: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.1 ptsWriter: 2.1%Bridget Pranzatelli: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.2 ptsWriter: 1.2%Bridget Pranzatelli: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.