Eric Swalwell cowers in billionaire pal's $26M mansion  as rape claim sparks career freefall 62%

By Josh Koehn0%

4/12/2026, 3:38:45 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 51.5% saturation with 494 hits. Analysis detected 3,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 959 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (8,340 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the article peer group.

Rep. 
Eric Swalwell’s political career is collapsing at a shocking speed. 
Within 24 hours, the Bay Area congressman went from Democratic frontrunner for California governor to facing pressure to not only end his campaign but resign from Congress  while now being the subject of a criminal sexual assault investigation into allegations by a former staffer she was raped while drunk at an April 2024 charity gala. 
Three other women have made claims about sexual misconduct ranging from inappropriate messages or unwanted contact. 
The women have claimed they have documented visits to the hospital and contemporaneous messages with friends and family about the incidents. 
“I was pushing him off of me, saying no,” she told CNN. 
“He didn’t stop.” 
The DA’s office issued a statement Saturday urging survivors and anyone with knowledge of allegations to contact its Special Victims Division. 
“Our specially trained prosecutors, investigators and counselors are well-equipped to help you in a trauma-informed, survivor-centered manner,” officials said. 
Swalwell has furiously denied the allegations of rape and sexual assault, but he did admit to indiscretions in a social media post Friday evening, saying he would be spending time away from the campaign with family and friends. 
However, The Post confirmed that rather than being at home, Swalwell was holed up in the $26 million Beverly Hills mansion of his eccentric billionaire benefactor, Stephen Cloobeck. 
Multiple sources confirmed that the video Swalwell recorded was taken from a room inside the 9,700-square-foot home of Cloobeck, who’s also been shacking up with an alleged honeytrapper accused of burglarizing the home of rich, older men in Los Angeles. 
“A lot has been said about me today through anonymous allegations, and I thought it was important that you see and hear from me directly,” Swalwell said in his denial video. 
“These allegations of sexual assault are flat out false.” 
Katie Porter, a former congressman, was one of many candidates in the race for governor calling on Swalwell to end his campaign and to resign from Congress. 
“But those decisions do not absolve him of taking responsibility for his misconduct, especially when he has attempted to silence and retaliate against these victims,” Porter wrote, leading some to note allegations that she verbally abused and physically assaulted her ex-husband. 
Michael Trujillo, a Democratic political strategist based in Los Angeles, told The Post he had heard of improper relationships between Swalwell and staff as far back as 2017  but even he was taken back by the rape allegations. 
“Narcissistic sociopaths think they’re good guys. 
So no matter what Eric Swalwell has been accused of, he still thinks he’s a good person,” he said. 
Swalwell’s resistance to dropping out of the race has done little keep his campaign staff from hemorrhaging. 
“We’re trying to help the staff [find new jobs], people who are new and cared and believed and put their professional lives on the line,” one campaign source told The Post. 
“They went to work for someone who has horribly let them down.”​ 
Senior staffers for both Swalwell’s campaign and his congressional office issued a joint statement saying they are “horrified” by the allegations. 
“The behavior detailed in these reports is abhorrent, beneath the dignity of those serving in public office and betrays the trust of all Californians,” staffers wrote. 
“Any decision of staff members to remain in their roles in the interim should not be viewed as support for Eric Swalwell.” 
David Latterman, a political analyst in San Francisco, said that Swalwell’s campaign is like a “dead man walking.” 
Many of Swalwell’s Democratic allies in Congress  from House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries to former speaker Rep. 
Nancy Pelosi  have called for an investigation and told Swalwell to drop out of the governor’s race. 
“Maybe the campaign is the least of his problems right now if he’s criminally charged and there is real evidence against him,” Latterman told The Post. 
Swalwell’s financial disclosures offer one possible explanation for why he has refused to step aside. 
The congressman, who previously worked as a prosecutor in Alameda County, had at least $80,000 in credit card and student loan debt as of last summer, along with a home loan for a property in Washington, DC, valued between $1 million and $5 million, according to economic disclosures he filed. 
Meanwhile, his assets included a Bank of America account with as little as $15,000 and a small public pension valued between $1,001 and $15,000. 
Swalwell’s reported stake in AI company Findraiser, which has been accused of aggressively courting business in a manner that may violate House ethics laws, was valued between $250,000 and $500,000. 
The technology may be a tougher sell with Swalwell under criminal investigation.​ 
Swalwell, who has claimed to rent a room in Livermore to establish residency in California, now could be on the hook for legal fees to defend himself if a case moves forward. 
The Post visited Swalwell’s home in Livermore last month and found an empty cottage cheese container on the lawn, and none of his neighbors could recall having ever seen him. 
With money tight, Swalwell’s past campaigns have offered a lifeline for his family, as he spent $244,000 in campaign funds on childcare from 2019 through 2025, according to the Sacramento Bee. 
Swalwell and his wife Brittany  whom he apologized to in his denial video Friday  have three young children. 
A source familiar with the congressman’s financial history told The Post that Swalwell’s money situation may be what’s driving his refusal to heed calls for him to end his campaign and resign from Congress. 
“He has no backup,” the source said. 
“I really think so much of this is about a financial path forward.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 25.7%Josh Koehn: 3.9%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias25.7%This article: 6.4%Josh Koehn: 1.1%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias6.4%This article: 16.9%Josh Koehn: 5.0%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic16.9%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.7%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 1.4%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Josh Koehn: 0.9%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias1.4%This article: 18.1%Josh Koehn: 13.8%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect18.1%This article: 5.7%Josh Koehn: 0.9%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion5.7%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.5%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.5%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 1.2%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Josh Koehn: 2.7%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias6.9%This article: 51.5%Josh Koehn: 25.9%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias51.5%This article: 7.5%Josh Koehn: 2.4%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias7.5%This article: 3.3%Josh Koehn: 1.6%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error3.3%This article: 2.9%Josh Koehn: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias2.9%This article: 3.2%Josh Koehn: 2.2%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 1.5%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Josh Koehn: 1.4%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.8%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.1%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.8%Josh Koehn: 1.4%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.9%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Josh Koehn: 5.6%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem2.6%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.4%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.8%Josh Koehn: 2.4%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority9.8%This article: 8.6%Josh Koehn: 2.1%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma8.6%This article: 1.3%Josh Koehn: 1.9%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope1.3%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.2%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.5%Josh Koehn: 7.9%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization7.5%This article: 11.4%Josh Koehn: 3.2%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring11.4%This article: 6.6%Josh Koehn: 2.2%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon6.6%This article: 6.8%Josh Koehn: 7.2%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion6.8%This article: 0.9%Josh Koehn: 2.4%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question0.9%This article: 13.9%Josh Koehn: 3.6%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.9%This article: 4.3%Josh Koehn: 0.6%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque4.3%This article: 11.7%Josh Koehn: 1.6%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof11.7%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.3%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.6%Josh Koehn: 2.9%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal10.6%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.1%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.2%Josh Koehn: 1.3%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.2%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.3%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.1%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.2%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.7%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 17.1%Josh Koehn: 2.7%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote17.1%This article: 3.8%Josh Koehn: 1.9%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection3.8%This article: 33.9%Josh Koehn: 15.4%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice33.9%This article: 5.0%Josh Koehn: 1.0%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination5.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.7%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Josh Koehn: 3.3%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Josh Koehn: 0.2%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

959 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers23%attributed speech737writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 56 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageCNN • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageDA’s office • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageEric Swalwell • 31 words • 100.0% coverageEric Swalwell • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageKatie Porter • 41 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Trujillo • 39 words • 100.0% coverageMichael Trujillo • 6 words • 100.0% coverageMichael Trujillo • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageDavid Latterman • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Latterman • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Michael Trujillo

100%flagged-word coverage
64 attributed words29% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Biased Writer Voice+24.6 ptsWriter: 36.4%Michael Trujillo: 60.9%60.9%Unattributed Quote-16.4 ptsWriter: 16.4%Michael Trujillo: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+6.9 ptsWriter: 2.4%Michael Trujillo: 9.4%9.4%Indoctrination-6.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%Michael Trujillo: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Michael Trujillo: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.