Shocking scenes in DTLA as anti-Trump agitators descend on federal building during 'No Kings' protests 84%

By Nina Joudeh75% Daniel Farr69%

3/28/2026, 7:00:49 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 61.1% saturation with 395 hits. Analysis detected 1,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 647 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 76% and a BS Rank of 84% (3,494 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the article peer group.

Hundreds of agitators violently clashed with police outside a federal complex in downtown Los Angeles on Saturday as “No Kings” protests swept across Southern California and the rest of the nation. 
About two hundred troublemakers headed to the site to taunt officers, violently shaking metal gates set up to protect the complex and shouting profanities at officers. 
“F—k you, f—ing come and get me,” one shouted. 
Protesters, many masked and promoting anti-ICE, anti‑war and pro‑Palestine causes, baited agents with megaphones, calling them “scumbags” and daring them to confront the growing crowd. 
Authorities had given initial warnings to the protesters, who chucked pink smoke bombs, pieces of wood and water over the fences. 
After subsequent warnings, officers shot tear gas at the rioters and began detaining them. 
The scene then descended into chaos as LAPD officers and federal agents stood guard, with police on horseback eventually deployed to the scene. 
A woman told a California Post reporter that her son had been detained and urged others to “get out of here.” 
Police announced that several arrests had been made. 
The LAPD issued a citywide tactical alert at 5 p.m. due to “incidents occurring on Alameda between Aliso and Temple” near the federal Metropolitan Detention Center. 
Authorities gave initial warnings to the protesters, who chucked pink smoke bombs, pieces of wood and water over the fences. 
The scene around the corner from City Hall and its surrounding streets descended into chaos as LAPD and federal agents were on site. 
LA’s top federal prosecutor Bill Essayli said agents had been attacked at the scene. 
“Federal agents have started arresting those who assaulted our personnel at the Los Angeles courthouse,” he wrote on X. 
“To those who were smashing concrete blocks and throwing them at our officers, we have you on video. 
We will find you and arrest you too. 
You’ve been warned.” 
Earlier in the day, demonstrators swarmed downtown LA for the “No Kings” demonstration, joining a nationwide wave of rallies led by left-leaning radical groups attacking President Trump and his administration’s agenda. 
Crowds jammed the area outside City Hall, waving vulgar signs and chanting before the violence spread into surrounding streets. 
Organizers called the protest the largest in US history, with millions expected to take to the streets across all 50 states. 
An aerial view of a large "No Kings" protest outside Los Angeles City Hall, with tents, umbrellas, and a "Trump Baby" balloon visible among the crowd. 
The demonstrations occurred as protesters railed against everything from ICE raids to the war in Iran. 
Flyers circulating online called for Trump’s impeachment and removal from office, describing his administration as a “regime.” 
In LA, taxpayers are footing the bill for the city’s protest. 
One of the leading groups participating is the Liberty Hill Foundation, a social justice nonprofit that receives $14 million in funding for tenant outreach and housing programs. 
Across town, Kamala Harris' husband Doug Emhoff strolled down from his swanky new Malibu pad to schmooze with celebrities at a star-studded Malibu “No Kings” rally Saturday. 
Across town, Kamala Harris' husband Doug Emhoff strolled down from his swanky new Malibu pad to schmooze with celebrities at a star-studded Malibu 'No Kings' rally Saturday. 
In comparison, Comedian Kathy Griffin, once known for holding a mock severed head of President Donald Trump, even took a photo with Emhoff at the rally. 
Emhoff spoke at the rally, one of 41that took place across Southern California for those opposed to the Trump administration. 
Comedian Kathy Griffin, once known for holding a mock severed head of President Trump, took a photo with Emhoff at the rally. 
Actor Sam Elliott, known for his roles in “The Big Lebowski” and an Oscar-nominated performance in “A Star is Born,” attended the Malibu rally wearing a shirt that read: “Vote the bum out.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.2%Nina Joudeh: 2.9%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.8%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Nina Joudeh: 3.9%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic11.0%This article: 4.8%Nina Joudeh: 1.5%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.8%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.5%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Nina Joudeh: 0.7%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias3.1%This article: 23.0%Nina Joudeh: 14.0%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect23.0%This article: 1.7%Nina Joudeh: 1.4%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion1.7%This article: 4.2%Nina Joudeh: 1.1%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.3%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 2.7%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Nina Joudeh: 2.8%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias1.2%This article: 61.1%Nina Joudeh: 17.6%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias61.1%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 3.7%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 1.5%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.2%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.7%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Nina Joudeh: 1.8%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.9%This article: 9.3%Nina Joudeh: 1.7%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect9.3%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.1%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.6%Nina Joudeh: 1.7%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias3.6%This article: 4.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.7%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.1%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%Nina Joudeh: 5.0%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem12.4%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.2%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.9%Nina Joudeh: 2.7%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority7.9%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 1.3%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 1.0%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.8%Nina Joudeh: 5.1%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization12.8%This article: 7.4%Nina Joudeh: 0.3%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring7.4%This article: 4.8%Nina Joudeh: 0.7%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon4.8%This article: 1.4%Nina Joudeh: 7.3%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion1.4%This article: 1.7%Nina Joudeh: 0.4%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question1.7%This article: 6.5%Nina Joudeh: 2.3%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.5%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.9%Nina Joudeh: 0.3%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof2.9%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.5%Nina Joudeh: 4.2%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal6.5%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 1.4%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.3%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.4%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 4.2%Nina Joudeh: 0.8%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy4.2%This article: 7.9%Nina Joudeh: 3.8%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote7.9%This article: 1.4%Nina Joudeh: 2.1%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 57.0%Nina Joudeh: 15.2%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice57.0%This article: 1.7%Nina Joudeh: 0.7%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination1.7%This article: 8.7%Nina Joudeh: 0.7%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias8.7%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 4.4%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.8%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

647 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers21%attributed speech512writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageLAPD • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageBill Essayli • 14 words • 0.0% coverageBill Essayli • 19 words • 0.0% coverageBill Essayli • 18 words • 0.0% coverageBill Essayli • 8 words • 0.0% coverageBill Essayli • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageLiberty Hill Foundation • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageDoug Emhoff • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words20% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Biased Writer Voice-72.1 ptsWriter: 72.1%Liberty Hill Foundation: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-10.9 ptsWriter: 10.9%Liberty Hill Foundation: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-10.0 ptsWriter: 10.0%Liberty Hill Foundation: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.1 ptsWriter: 2.1%Liberty Hill Foundation: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Liberty Hill Foundation: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.