Student Loan Purchase Programs Under the Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act of 2008 1%

By Steve Zehngut35%

5/27/2009, 7:19:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 81 faulty-reasoning hits from 185 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 1% (21,798 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the article peer group.

May 27, 2009 3:19 PM ET 
Click here to download a PDF copy of this report. 
In May of 2008, Congress passed the Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act (ECASLA) in response to concern that credit market conditions could disrupt federal student loan availability. 
The law gives the U.S. 
Department of Education temporary authority to purchase federally backed student loans made by private lenders, effectively providing a secondary market for the loans. 
Congress opted to leave the new purchase authority largely undefined in statute, giving the Department considerable discretion to design and administer it. 
To date, the Department has created four separate loan purchase arrangements under ECASLA: a put option; a short-term purchase program; a financing arrangement; and an asset-backed commercial paper support program. 
This issue brief provides a detailed description of these arrangements and has been updated with new information since originally published in January 2009. 
To read the full report, download the PDF at right under “related files.” 
Student Loan Purchase Programs Under ECASLA 2008 (10pp, PDF) 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 5.7%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%Steve Zehngut: 2.0%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Availability Heuristic12.4%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 5.4%The Daily Caller: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 12.2%The Daily Caller: 10.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 1.6%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 5.6%The Daily Caller: 2.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 11.3%The Daily Caller: 8.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 1.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.6%The Daily Caller: 1.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 16.2%Steve Zehngut: 0.7%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Recency Bias16.2%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.1%The Daily Caller: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.1%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.6%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 3.2%The Daily Caller: 4.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 3.1%The Daily Caller: 2.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 5.1%The Daily Caller: 2.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.4%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 6.9%The Daily Caller: 6.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.7%The Daily Caller: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 4.8%The Daily Caller: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 1.7%The Daily Caller: 2.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 6.0%The Daily Caller: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 1.5%The Daily Caller: 1.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.7%Steve Zehngut: 2.7%The Daily Caller: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.7%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.1%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 2.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.8%The Daily Caller: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 12.9%The Daily Caller: 8.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 2.7%The Daily Caller: 3.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Zehngut: 1.4%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%Steve Zehngut: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.4%

185 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker29%attributed speech132writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Department of Education • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Department of Education • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
57%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words100% of attributed speech39% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -17.4 ptsWriter: 17.4%U.S. Department of Education: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.