Newsmax75%

ICE Launches Effort to Uncover 'Birth Tourism Schemes' 61%

By Kristina Cooke0% Ted Hesson0%

4/10/2026, 8:35:54 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 208 hits. Analysis detected 1,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 742 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 56.5% and a BS Rank of 61% (8,656 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump's administration plans to crack down on networks it says help pregnant women lie on visa applications in order to secure U.S. citizenship for their U.S.-born babies, an issue that Trump has highlighted to justify his attempts to restrict birthright citizenship. 
In an internal email sent Thursday and reviewed by Reuters, Immigration and Customs Enforcement ordered investigative agents around the country to focus on a new "Birth Tourism Initiative." 
The operation will seek to root out networks that help pregnant foreign nationals come to the U.S. to give birth so their children can receive citizenship, it said. 
Trump, a Republican, has kicked off an aggressive push to reduce both legal and illegal immigration after taking office in January 2025. 
His administration has used the threat of birth tourism as a rationale for attempting to restrict the practice of granting automatic citizenship to children born on U.S. soil. 
"Uninhibited birth tourism poses a tremendous cost to taxpayers and threatens our national security," White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said in a statement, adding that most nations do not provide automatic citizenship at birth. 
The Department of Homeland Security declined to comment on any ongoing investigations, but said it was aware that some networks facilitate travel to the U.S. for birth tourism. 
"While the act of giving birth in the United States is not unlawful, DHS remains focused on identifying and addressing potential violations of federal law associated with these activities," a spokesperson said. 
No U.S. law outright bars birth tourism, but a federal regulation implemented in 2020 during Trump's first term prohibits using temporary tourist and business visas for the primary purpose of obtaining U.S. citizenship for a newborn. 
People who engage in birth tourism schemes could be prosecuted for fraud or other related crimes. 
Rationale to Limit Citizenship 
There are no official figures tallying the number of foreigners who come to the U.S. for the explicit purpose of giving birth and obtaining citizenship for their children, or the cost to taxpayers. 
The Center for Immigration Studies, which supports lower levels of immigration, estimated in an analysis in 2020 that between 20,000 and 25,000 mothers came to the U.S. for birth tourism in a yearlong period betweeen 2016 and 2017. 
There were 3.6 million births in the U.S. in 2025, and birth tourism likely represents a fraction of total births. 
Republicans have highlighted allegations of birth tourism as a reason to limit access to U.S. citizenship, which has long been conferred at birth under an amendment to the Constitution. 
Trump issued an executive order on his first day in office that instructed U.S. agencies not to recognize the citizenship of children born in the U.S. if neither parent is an American citizen or legal permanent resident, a sharp break from legal precedent spanning more than a century. 
Multiple federal judges blocked the order, sending the case to the Supreme Court for oral arguments last week. 
U.S. 
Solicitor General D. 
John Sauer, representing the Trump administration, said automatic citizenship had encouraged "a sprawling industry of birth tourism." 
Sauer said the promise of citizenship for those born in the U.S. had encouraged thousands of people from "potentially hostile nations" to come to give birth, "creating a whole generation of American citizens abroad with no meaningful ties to the United States." 
ICE Aims to Find Fraud 
ICE's new birth tourism effort  spearheaded by its Homeland Security Investigations arm  aims to surface cases of fraud, but it is unclear how many cases the agency might find. 
Homeland Security Investigations "is advancing efforts to protect the integrity of U.S. immigration and identification systems, specifically targeting fraudulent activities associated with birth tourism schemes," the email said. 
The agency said it would seek to disrupt "fraud, financial crimes, and organized facilitation networks that exploit lawful immigration processes." 
In one federal case in 2019, more than a dozen people were charged in a scheme to operate "birth houses" in Southern California that catered to wealthy women from China. 
In the case  billed by ICE at the time as the first U.S. prosecution against birth tourism  Chinese national Dongyuan Li pleaded guilty to federal charges in connection with the scheme. 
She was sentenced to 10 months in prison and released in December 2019. 
Another Chinese national, Chao "Edwin" Chen, was sentenced to three years in prison in 2020 but had already fled the U.S. for China, according to ICE. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.9%Kristina Cooke: 3.7%Newsmax: 3.4%Confirmation Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%Kristina Cooke: 3.6%Newsmax: 3.2%Availability Heuristic10.1%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.6%Kristina Cooke: 2.7%Newsmax: 3.8%Overconfidence Bias8.6%This article: 21.8%Kristina Cooke: 19.0%Newsmax: 11.0%Framing Effect21.8%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Kristina Cooke: 0.7%Newsmax: 4.1%Optimism Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 2.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 28.0%Kristina Cooke: 13.0%Newsmax: 10.3%Negativity Bias28.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 3.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Kristina Cooke: 3.4%Newsmax: 2.7%In-Group Bias9.6%This article: 8.6%Kristina Cooke: 9.4%Newsmax: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.7%Newsmax: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.3%Kristina Cooke: 5.2%Newsmax: 4.8%Appeal to Authority13.3%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 3.8%Kristina Cooke: 0.9%Newsmax: 0.2%Circular Reasoning3.8%This article: 12.8%Kristina Cooke: 11.3%Newsmax: 4.2%Hasty Generalization12.8%This article: 8.1%Kristina Cooke: 2.0%Newsmax: 0.3%Red Herring8.1%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.9%Kristina Cooke: 11.5%Newsmax: 6.0%Appeal to Emotion12.9%This article: 5.8%Kristina Cooke: 1.4%Newsmax: 1.1%Begging the Question5.8%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.6%Newsmax: 3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.8%Kristina Cooke: 0.9%Newsmax: 0.5%Burden of Proof3.8%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.8%Kristina Cooke: 6.0%Newsmax: 0.9%Anecdotal7.8%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.8%Kristina Cooke: 3.7%Newsmax: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.8%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 24.1%Kristina Cooke: 6.0%Newsmax: 3.1%Unattributed Quote24.1%This article: 4.6%Kristina Cooke: 1.1%Newsmax: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection4.6%This article: 15.1%Kristina Cooke: 7.7%Newsmax: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice15.1%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.7%Kristina Cooke: 7.0%Newsmax: 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias14.7%This article: 0.0%Kristina Cooke: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

742 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers29%attributed speech524writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageImmigration and Customs Enforcement • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Kelly • 34 words • 100.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageCenter for Immigration Studies • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Sauer • 17 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Sauer • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageImmigration and Customs Enforcement • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

John Sauer

100%flagged-word coverage
59 attributed words27% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Politically Right Leaning +65.7 ptsWriter: 5.5%John Sauer: 71.2%71.2%Unattributed Quote+3.2 ptsWriter: 25.6%John Sauer: 28.8%28.8%Biased Writer Voice-21.4 ptsWriter: 21.4%John Sauer: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.