Suspect in New York subway machete attack shot and killed by police 15%

By Robert Mackey35%

4/11/2026, 3:17:39 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 303 faulty-reasoning hits from 336 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (18,635 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the article peer group.

Police in New York City shot and killed a man who stabbed three people on a subway platform in New York City’s Grand Central station, the city’s police commissioner said. 
Jessica Tisch, who leads the New York police department, told reporters at a news conference at the station that officers, flagged down by a witness to the stabbings at about 9.40am, had encountered a suspect, armed with a machete, who defied at least 20 verbal orders to drop the weapon and repeatedly stated “that he was Lucifer”. 
The officers attempted to de-escalate, the commissioner said, telling the suspect “we are going to get you help”. 
When the suspect approached the officers with the weapon, one of them shot the man twice and began emergency medical aid. 
The suspect, identified by Tisch as 44-year-old Anthony Griffin, was pronounced dead at Bellevue Hospital. 
The suspect entered the New York subway system in Queens on Saturday morning, according to surveillance footage. 
His first victim, an 84-year-old man, was slashed on the head on the 7 train subway platform in the station at Grand Central at East 42nd Street and Park Avenue in midtown Manhattan. 
The suspect then moved upstairs to the platform for the 4,5 and 6 subway lines, where he slashed a 65-year-old man and fractured his skull, and then slashed a third victim, a woman, in the shoulder. 
All three victims were hospitalized in stable condition with injuries that “are not believed to be life-threatening”, the police commissioner said. 
“The whole incident was captured on body-worn camera”, Tisch said. 
New York’s mayor, Zohran Mamdani, wrote on social media that he had been briefed on the incident. 
The police posted a photograph of the weapon on social media. 
The suspect had three prior arrests, but “no EDP history”, Tisch said, using the shorthand for the “emotionally disturbed person” reports filed by her department. 
Multiple subway trains would bypass the station until further notice, the police said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.4%Robert Mackey: 1.2%the Guardian: 3.7%Confirmation Bias7.4%This article: 4.5%Robert Mackey: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.6%Anchoring Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 2.4%the Guardian: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 7.4%Robert Mackey: 0.4%the Guardian: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic7.4%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 1.2%the Guardian: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 1.2%the Guardian: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Robert Mackey: 6.2%the Guardian: 6.1%Framing Effect6.3%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.7%the Guardian: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.4%the Guardian: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Robert Mackey: 7.4%the Guardian: 10.4%Negativity Bias10.7%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 1.2%the Guardian: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.4%the Guardian: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.8%the Guardian: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.3%the Guardian: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.4%the Guardian: 3.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.5%the Guardian: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 2.7%the Guardian: 2.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 19.9%Robert Mackey: 2.7%the Guardian: 3.8%Appeal to Authority19.9%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.8%the Guardian: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 1.3%the Guardian: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.7%Robert Mackey: 3.1%the Guardian: 6.3%Hasty Generalization10.7%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 4.4%the Guardian: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 1.4%the Guardian: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.3%Robert Mackey: 1.5%the Guardian: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.3%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.6%the Guardian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 17.0%Robert Mackey: 0.3%the Guardian: 3.1%Anecdotal17.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.5%the Guardian: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 2.0%the Guardian: 1.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.6%the Guardian: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 4.3%the Guardian: 10.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.8%the Guardian: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 3.4%the Guardian: 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 1.5%the Guardian: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

336 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers44%attributed speech188writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Tisch • 57 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Tisch • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Tisch • 10 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 17 words • 0.0% coveragepolice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Tisch • 25 words • 0.0% coveragepolice • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jessica Tisch

100%flagged-word coverage
107 attributed words72% of attributed speech41% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.