Bond girl Eva Green 'rushed to hospital after an accident on set of Wednesday' as filming for Netflix show is 'halted' ⁠56%

By Rebecca Lawrence⁠0%

6/27/2026, 9:49:18 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 655 faulty-reasoning hits from 391 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (9,407 of 21,196 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the article peer group.

Bond girl Eva Green was reportedly rushed to hospital after suffering an accident on the set of Wednesday. 
The French actress, 45, is making her debut in the third series of the Addams Family spin-off, but is said to have got off to a bad start after injuring her leg. 
Eva, who is best known for playing Bond girl Vesper Lynd in Casino Royale, was said to be filming near Dublin when the accident occurred. 
Filming was then halted on the popular show but it is said to have reconvened this month. 
A source said: 'This was really nasty. 
Eva sustained an injury and was clearly in pain and producers were taking no chances.' 
They added to The Sun: 'Medics were called and Eva went to hospital. 
She underwent treatment and is now recovering well.' 
As well as Eva, Game of Thrones actress Lena Headey, Ted Lasso star James Lance and Pretty In Pink's Andrew McCarthy are joining the new season. 
They're joined by Stranger Things' Winona Ryder, Game of Thrones' Noah Taylor, A Knight of the Seven Kingdom's Oscar Morgan, Task's Kennedy Moyer and Dog Day Afternoon's Chris Sarandon. 
Wednesday, whose first season holds the record for Netflix's most-watched English-language show of all time, currently has no release date, but fans are expecting another split season after series two was released in halves. 
The series stars Jenna Ortega as a teenage iteration of Wednesday Addams, who attempts to solve murder mysteries at her new school. 
While there are few details of what fans can expect from series three, it will follow on from the dramatic ending that aired last year – with Wednesday's best friend Enid missing, and a premonition that Wednesday will die. 
Al Gough and Miles Millar, the creators, show runners and executive producers, said: 'It’s our dark delight to fling open Nevermore Academy’s gates once more as we begin production on Season Three. 
'We thank our invincible cast and crew for their continued commitment to doom and gloom. 
'To the fans, we appreciate your patience and ravenous online commentary – your twisted theories have inspired nightmares. 
'This season we welcome new students, new teachers, and excavate some long-rotting Addams Family secrets. 
Don’t say you weren’t warned.' 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 6.1%Daily Mail: 3.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.8%Daily Mail: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Rebecca Lawrence: 7.9%Daily Mail: 3.5%Availability Heuristic7.9%This article: 8.7%Rebecca Lawrence: 2.8%Daily Mail: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic8.7%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 23.5%Rebecca Lawrence: 10.0%Daily Mail: 9.1%Framing Effect23.5%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.3%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.4%Status Quo Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 1.6%Daily Mail: 2.3%Optimism Bias2.0%This article: 17.6%Rebecca Lawrence: 2.1%Daily Mail: 1.2%Pessimism Bias17.6%This article: 29.4%Rebecca Lawrence: 18.4%Daily Mail: 12.7%Negativity Bias29.4%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.5%Daily Mail: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.7%Daily Mail: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Rebecca Lawrence: 3.3%Daily Mail: 4.5%Halo Effect10.2%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.7%Rebecca Lawrence: 4.5%Daily Mail: 1.6%Recency Bias8.7%This article: 8.7%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.5%Primacy Effect8.7%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 1.3%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 2.0%Daily Mail: 4.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.7%Rebecca Lawrence: 6.3%Daily Mail: 4.3%Hasty Generalization8.7%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.6%Rebecca Lawrence: 4.6%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon4.6%This article: 4.6%Rebecca Lawrence: 4.1%Daily Mail: 7.6%Appeal to Emotion4.6%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 2.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 3.3%Daily Mail: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.8%Rebecca Lawrence: 9.6%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal3.8%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.2%Rebecca Lawrence: 1.8%Daily Mail: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.2%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 13.3%Daily Mail: 3.8%Unattributed Quote11.0%This article: 5.4%Rebecca Lawrence: 3.5%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection5.4%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 9.2%Daily Mail: 9.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rebecca Lawrence: 2.7%Daily Mail: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

391 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker22%attributed speech306writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageAl Gough and Miles Millar • 32 words • 0.0% coverageAl Gough and Miles Millar • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAl Gough and Miles Millar • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAl Gough and Miles Millar • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAl Gough and Miles Millar • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
85 attributed words100% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-14.1 ptsWriter: 14.1%Al Gough and Miles Millar: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-6.9 ptsWriter: 6.9%Al Gough and Miles Millar: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.