Anna Faris gets brutally honest in rare comment on Chris Pratt divorce... and reveals surprising coping mechanism 28%

By Sameer Suri0%

6/13/2026, 11:11:29 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.1% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 1,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 646 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39% and a BS Rank of 28% (15,759 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the article peer group.

Anna Faris offered a blistering account of her divorce from Chris Pratt, after keeping the subject firmly out of the public eye for years. 
Faris and Pratt eloped to Bali in 2009 and welcomed their son Jack, 13, in 2012 before separating in 2017 and finalizing their divorce the following year . 
They drew a veil of privacy over the dissolution of their marriage as they co-parented their son, and they eventually found love with other people. 
Now, however, Faris has finally discussed the emotional turmoil she suffered from not only the divorce but also the public attention it drew. 
'I was feeling sad. 
Sad,' she told Variety. 
'I do feel like I had enough gumption, enough of a core, and I have tried to be careful about how much Hollywood infiltrates, but now I’ve been on a spectrum of fame for 26 years, so I would be naïve to think that it hasn’t shaped who I am at this point. 
But, f***. 
The scrutiny.' 
She revealed that working on her advice podcast Unqualified, which she had initially launched in 2015, helped her through the period. 
'I’m lucky that at that time I had my podcast,' she said. 
'That goes back to the talk radio. 
I wanted, like, four people to listen and to build my own secret community. 
I wanted an avenue outside of Hollywood as a way to connect with people.' 
Faris acknowledged that she 'didn’t disclose a lot on the podcast, but I always felt like I could if I needed to. 
The podcast helped me a lot during that time, and it made me think: I know I could be happy if I’m writing, because I’ve always loved that, and maybe that’s an avenue to make money. 
I was thinking of a version of retirement.' 
In 2017, the year her marriage to Pratt imploded, Faris released a book named after her podcast that was a combination of advice and memoir. 
Although the book was written before her marital separation and featured a foreword from Pratt, it was published two months after she and Pratt announced their split. 
Pratt has since married Arnold Schwarzenegger's daughter Katherine, with whom he has three further children - Lyla, five, Eloise, four, and Ford, one. 
Meanwhile Faris found love again in the form of Ted cinematographer Michael Barrett, with whom she held a courthouse wedding in 2021. 
The first time since their divorce that Pratt and Faris were publicly spotted in the same location was last June, at their son's middle school graduation. 
Then, on the day before Thanksgiving, the exes were seen hugging in front of Katherine at a charity event at St. 
Monica’s Catholic Church in Los Angeles. 
Katherine was not seen interacting with her husband's first wife, but could be glimpsed observing their interaction at a short distance. 
Pratt's parenting of Jack came under fierce scrutiny in 2021, when he faced a deluge of blowback over an Instagram post praising Katherine. 
'She's given me an amazing life, a gorgeous healthy daughter, she chews so loudly that sometimes I put in my ear buds to drown it out, but that's love!' 
he wrote. 
An army of online scolds interpreted the 'healthy daughter' line as a dig at Jack, who suffered a spate of medical problems after his premature birth. 
Shortly after the furor, Pratt candidly discussed the toll that the 'f***ed up' backlash had taken on him, in an interview with Men's Health. 
'My son’s gonna read that one day. 
He’s nine,' said Pratt. 
'And it’s etched in digital stone. 
It really f***ing bothered me, dude.' 
The Jurassic World star confessed: 'I cried about it. 
I was like, I hate that these blessings in my life are - to the people close to me - a real burden.' 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.3%Sameer Suri: 1.8%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Sameer Suri: 1.9%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic2.2%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.5%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%Sameer Suri: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias8.2%This article: 6.5%Sameer Suri: 4.0%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect6.5%This article: 3.6%Sameer Suri: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion3.6%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.5%Sameer Suri: 2.1%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias8.5%This article: 5.6%Sameer Suri: 0.3%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias5.6%This article: 33.1%Sameer Suri: 10.4%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias33.1%This article: 7.4%Sameer Suri: 3.5%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias7.4%This article: 3.3%Sameer Suri: 0.5%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error3.3%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Sameer Suri: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Sameer Suri: 4.5%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect1.4%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.3%Sameer Suri: 1.4%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias11.3%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.7%Sameer Suri: 0.9%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority3.7%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.0%Sameer Suri: 2.9%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization4.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.0%Sameer Suri: 3.5%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion7.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.3%Sameer Suri: 3.3%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.3%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 3.3%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.9%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.6%Sameer Suri: 3.3%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote0.6%This article: 5.4%Sameer Suri: 1.5%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection5.4%This article: 22.8%Sameer Suri: 7.7%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice22.8%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.2%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.8%Sameer Suri: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.8%

646 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers39%attributed speech391writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageAnna Faris • 4 words • 100.0% coverageAnna Faris • 4 words • 100.0% coverageAnna Faris • 53 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Faris • 2 words • 100.0% coverageAnna Faris • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Faris • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Faris • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Faris • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Faris • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Faris • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Faris • 36 words • 100.0% coverageAnna Faris • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageChris Pratt • 29 words • 100.0% coverageChris Pratt • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageChris Pratt • 7 words • 0.0% coverageChris Pratt • 4 words • 0.0% coverageChris Pratt • 6 words • 0.0% coverageChris Pratt • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageChris Pratt • 23 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Chris Pratt

84%flagged-word coverage
77 attributed words30% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Quote-first Misdirection+37.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Chris Pratt: 37.7%37.7%Biased Writer Voice-37.6 ptsWriter: 37.6%Chris Pratt: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -12.0 ptsWriter: 12.0%Chris Pratt: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.