Dances With Wolves actor Nathan Chasing Horse is sentenced to life in prison after sexual assault conviction 10%

By Brian Marks0%

4/27/2026, 11:24:02 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.2% saturation with 322 hits. Analysis detected 1,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 842 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.7% and a BS Rank of 10% (18,582 of 20,452 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the article peer group.

Dances With Wolves actor Nathan Chasing Horse didn't betray any sign of remorse as he was sentenced to life in prison on Monday after being convicted of sexually assaulting Indigenous women and girls earlier this year. 
'This is a miscarriage of justice,' Chasing Horse said in court after a Nevada judge announced his sentence. 
A jury had previously convicted the actor of 13 charges, mostly related to sexual assault. 
Chasing Horse, who has continued to deny that he is guilty, was accused by three women, including one who was only 14 when the assaults began. 
Chasing Horse had also been acquitted on some of the charges. 
Accusers and their families told Judge Jessica Peterson that they continue to suffer from the trauma caused by Chasing Horse and struggle with their faith after he exploited his position as a spiritual leader. 
Chasing Horse, who wore his navy blue Clark County Detention Center uniform, stared straight ahead as victims read their statements on Monday, according to video shared by Las Vegas station KTNV. 
The sentencing wraps a years-long effort to prosecute the former actor after he was first arrested and indicted in 2023. 
That initial arrest reverberated around Indian Country, with law enforcement in other states and Canada following up with more criminal charges, which are still pending. 
The British Columbia Prosecution Service said Chasing Horse was charged with sexual assault in February 2023, though the date of the alleged offense took place in September 2018, near Keremeos, a village about four hours east of Vancouver. 
After all of Chasing Horse´s appeals have been exhausted, British Columbia prosecutors will assess next steps, Damienne Darby, communications counsel for the British Columbia Prosecution Service, said in an email. 
A warrant against Chasing Horse remains outstanding in Alberta, the Tsuut'ina Nation Police Service in Alberta said in a statement following Chasing Horse´s conviction in January. 
The Tsuut'ina Nation Police Service said that it is in contact with the Alberta Crown Prosecutors Office regarding the warrant. 
Chasing Horse was born on the Rosebud Reservation in South Dakota, which is home to the Sicangu Sioux, one of the seven tribes of the Lakota nation. 
Following his appearance as the young Sioux tribe member Smiles a Lot in Kevin Costner´s Oscar-winning Western film Dances With Wolves, Chasing Horse traveled across Indian Country to attend powwows and perform healing ceremonies. 
During his trial, Nevada prosecutors said Chasing Horse used his reputation as a Lakota medicine man to prey on Indigenous women and girls. 
Deputy District Attorney Bianca Pucci told the jury that for almost 20 years, Chasing Horse 'spun a web of abuse' that ensnared many women. 
Jurors heard from three women who said Chasing Horse sexually assaulted them. 
The jury returned guilty verdicts on some charges related to all three. 
Multiple victims described how they participated in his ceremonies or went to Chasing Horse for medical help. 
Corena Leone-LaCroix, one of the victims, was 14 in 2012 when Chasing Horse allegedly told her the spirits wanted her to give up her virginity to save her mother, who was diagnosed with cancer. 
He then sexually assaulted her and told her that if she told anyone, her mother would die, according to Pucci. 
The sexual assaults continued for years, she said. 
'There is no way to get back the youth, the childhood loss, my first time, my first kiss, the graduation I never got to have,' said Leone-LaCroix. 
'The life that little girl could have lived has been taken from me forever.' 
Chasing Horse denied the allegations, and his attorney questioned the main accuser's credibility, calling her a 'scorned woman.' 
His attorney had filed a motion for a new trial, arguing that a witness was not qualified to talk about grooming and that the statute of limitations had expired. 
That motion was denied. 
Victims and their family members testified that they struggle with their faith as a result of Chasing Horse´s actions. 
The mothers of the victims said Chasing Horse betrayed their trust and abused sacred traditions. 
'Even to this day, I struggle to regain my faith and spirituality,' a victim´s mother said. 
One victim said she still faces complications after suffering an ectopic pregnancy as a result of the assault and being forced to undergo surgery. 
'I am choosing to see this moment as a fresh start. 
I will rebuild my life, reclaim my voice and continue fighting for the future I deserve,' one victim said. 
Dr. 
Crystal Lee, CEO and founder of the organization United Natives, which offers services to victims of sexual abuse, said she hopes the victims find peace with the sentencing. 
Lee said Chasing Horse´s case shows the importance of holding high-profile perpetrators accountable and believing the victims involved. 
Chasing Horse used his status as an actor and medicine man to prey on victims, similarly to other faith leaders who abuse their power, Lee said. 
'I think it makes us question who we trust and why we trust,' Lee said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.9%Brian Marks: 2.4%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias3.9%This article: 4.5%Brian Marks: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias4.5%This article: 8.0%Brian Marks: 1.7%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic8.0%This article: 8.3%Brian Marks: 1.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic8.3%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Brian Marks: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias3.6%This article: 7.5%Brian Marks: 2.8%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect7.5%This article: 4.9%Brian Marks: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion4.9%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Brian Marks: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect2.4%This article: 6.9%Brian Marks: 0.5%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias6.9%This article: 1.7%Brian Marks: 0.8%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias1.7%This article: 38.2%Brian Marks: 6.5%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias38.2%This article: 5.2%Brian Marks: 1.1%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias5.2%This article: 12.0%Brian Marks: 0.8%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error12.0%This article: 2.7%Brian Marks: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Brian Marks: 6.5%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.0%Brian Marks: 0.7%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Brian Marks: 3.2%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem2.1%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.4%Brian Marks: 1.3%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority14.4%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.9%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.1%Brian Marks: 3.5%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization3.1%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 31.5%Brian Marks: 4.4%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion31.5%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.8%Brian Marks: 1.1%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.8%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.1%Brian Marks: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division2.1%This article: 2.0%Brian Marks: 2.6%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal2.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.1%Brian Marks: 1.5%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.1%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.0%Brian Marks: 1.4%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote4.0%This article: 2.1%Brian Marks: 0.5%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection2.1%This article: 2.9%Brian Marks: 10.6%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice2.9%This article: 3.9%Brian Marks: 1.5%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination3.9%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Marks: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Brian Marks: 0.5%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.3%

842 words analyzed.

Speakers

10speakers40%attributed speech507writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageNathan Chasing Horse • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageBritish Columbia Prosecution Service • 38 words • 0.0% coverageDamienne Darby • 30 words • 0.0% coverageTsuut'ina Nation Police Service in Alberta • 26 words • 0.0% coverageTsuut'ina Nation Police Service • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageNevada prosecutors • 23 words • 0.0% coverageBianca Pucci • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coveragePucci • 20 words • 0.0% coverageCorena Leone-LaCroix • 8 words • 0.0% coverageCorena Leone-LaCroix • 27 words • 0.0% coverageCorena Leone-LaCroix • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageCrystal Lee • 28 words • 100.0% coverageCrystal Lee • 18 words • 100.0% coverageCrystal Lee • 26 words • 0.0% coverageCrystal Lee • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Crystal Lee

100%flagged-word coverage
87 attributed words26% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Indoctrination+37.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Crystal Lee: 37.9%37.9%Attempt to Sell a Product +32.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Crystal Lee: 32.2%32.2%Unattributed Quote-3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%Crystal Lee: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.