Townhall⁠84%

U.S. Launches Fresh Strikes on Iran to Protect Shipping in Strait of Hormuz ⁠65%

By Scott McClallen⁠27%

7/12/2026, 10:36:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 134 hits. Analysis detected 1,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 564 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (7,833 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the article peer group.

Mitch McConnell Reveals What Caused His Extended Hospital Stay 
Lindsey Graham's Preliminary Cause of Death Revealed 
Leftists Should Want America to Be a Christian Nation 
The Consensus Senator 
Talk Radio Has Lost a Good Friend With the Passing of Senator Lindsey... 
Seven MBTA Workers Indicted for Faking Red Line Safety Inspections 
Telehealth Founder Sentenced for Distributing 37 Million Adderall Pills 
Nancy Mace Is Already Talking About Taking Over Lindsey Graham's Seat 
Democratic Socialists Eye Michigan Senate Seat Ahead of August Election 
Ro Khanna Can't Be Serious About This Statement on Graham Platner... 
Right? 
Maine Democrats Promise 'Fair' and 'Inclusive' Process to Replace Platner After Cutting Vo... 
These Ghouls Couldn't Help But Gloat Over Lindsey Graham's Death 
Trump, World Leaders Respond to Lindsey Graham's Death 
The U.S. has launched fresh strikes against Iran at 5 p.m. on Sunday, the U.S. 
Central Command posted on social media. 
The strikes followed Iran attack ing a commercial ship on Saturday and claimed that the Strait of Hormuz had been shut. 
“At 5 p.m. 
ET today, U.S. 
Central Command forces began launching more strikes against Iran to continue degrading their ability to attack civilian mariners and commercial ships freely transiting the Strait of Hormuz. 
The Commander in Chief has directed the strikes to hold Iranian forces accountable.” 
At 5 p.m. 
ET today, U.S. 
Central Command forces began launching more strikes against Iran to continue degrading their ability to attack civilian mariners and commercial ships freely transiting the Strait of Hormuz. 
The Commander in Chief has directed the strikes to hold Iranian… 
— U.S. 
Central Command (@CENTCOM) July 12, 2026 
BREAKING: U.S. 
Central Command says it has launched another round of strikes against Iran, targeting its ability to threaten civilian shipping in the Strait of Hormuz under orders from President Trump. pic.twitter.com/0DQAaglhbI 
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) July 12, 2026 
NEW!!! 
U.S. forces launch new strikes against Iran to protect shipping, CENTCOM says 👇 https://t.co/DoTDkRrXqi 
— Alex Raufoglu (@ralexdc) July 12, 2026 
CENTCOM refuted fake news from the Iranian state media that claimed Iran had killed four U.S. service members in a strike in Kuwait. 
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION 
TRUMP ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT 
🚫 CLAIM: Iranian propaganda claimed today that three American service members were killed in Kuwait by strikes from Iran. 
FALSE. 
✅ TRUTH: There are zero reports of U.S. service member deaths or injuries in the region. 
All personnel are accounted for. pic.twitter.com/9RZCN7puWT 
The relationship between the U.S. and Iran has deteriorated after Iran reportedly planned to assassinate Trump while he was in Turkey earlier this week. 
In response, Trump said that “1000 Missiles" are aimed at Iran in case it assassinates him. 
If that happened, Trump said that he gave orders to “completely decimate and destroy all areas of Iran…” 
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? 
Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Nick Shirley's Latest Fraud Video Is Another Gold Mine 
Democrats Really Don’t Have Any Idea What a Man Is 
Trending on Townhall Videos 
You Can Run but You Just Die Tired. 
Secretive Israeli Unit Kills Over 2,500 October 7 Hamas Terrorists 
More Than 200 FBI Agents Swarm Fulton County, Georgia, to Investigate 2020 Election Fraud 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.2%Scott McClallen: 2.4%Townhall: 5.3%Confirmation Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Scott McClallen: 1.5%Townhall: 2.8%Availability Heuristic3.5%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.4%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Scott McClallen: 1.3%Townhall: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias3.9%This article: 21.8%Scott McClallen: 7.7%Townhall: 11.2%Framing Effect21.8%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.7%Scott McClallen: 0.9%Townhall: 1.9%Pessimism Bias8.7%This article: 23.8%Scott McClallen: 8.5%Townhall: 13.5%Negativity Bias23.8%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.9%Townhall: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Scott McClallen: 2.8%Townhall: 4.6%In-Group Bias6.4%This article: 1.6%Scott McClallen: 0.9%Townhall: 3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.6%This article: 0.5%Scott McClallen: 1.4%Townhall: 1.8%Halo Effect0.5%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.4%Townhall: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.2%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 1.3%Recency Bias3.2%This article: 1.8%Scott McClallen: 0.3%Townhall: 0.6%Primacy Effect1.8%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%Scott McClallen: 1.5%Townhall: 5.0%Ad Hominem10.1%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 2.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.8%Scott McClallen: 4.2%Townhall: 4.4%Appeal to Authority18.8%This article: 1.6%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.9%False Dilemma1.6%This article: 6.0%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 1.6%Slippery Slope6.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.8%Scott McClallen: 2.3%Townhall: 9.1%Hasty Generalization1.8%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.9%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.3%Bandwagon0.9%This article: 19.5%Scott McClallen: 10.3%Townhall: 11.1%Appeal to Emotion19.5%This article: 1.6%Scott McClallen: 1.1%Townhall: 2.2%Begging the Question1.6%This article: 8.0%Scott McClallen: 1.4%Townhall: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.0%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.5%Burden of Proof3.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 1.8%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division1.8%This article: 1.8%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 1.4%Anecdotal1.8%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.1%Scott McClallen: 1.7%Townhall: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.1%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.2%Scott McClallen: 2.0%Townhall: 3.4%Unattributed Quote11.2%This article: 5.1%Scott McClallen: 3.2%Townhall: 3.0%Quote-first Misdirection5.1%This article: 5.0%Scott McClallen: 5.5%Townhall: 16.1%Biased Writer Voice5.0%This article: 5.3%Scott McClallen: 4.0%Townhall: 5.6%Indoctrination5.3%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 5.5%Townhall: 13.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%Scott McClallen: 3.8%Townhall: 5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.1%

564 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers32%attributed speech384writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 30 words • 0.0% coverageBreaking911 • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Raufoglu • 7 words • 100.0% coverageCentral Command • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 16 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageTownhall VIP • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words19% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.2 ptsWriter: 11.2%Trump: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-7.8 ptsWriter: 7.8%Trump: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.3 ptsWriter: 7.3%Trump: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.7 ptsWriter: 5.7%Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.