Townhall84%

Chicago Man Gets Four Years for $2 Million COVID Loan Fraud Scheme 7%

By Scott McClallen27%

7/11/2026, 1:00:28 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 820 faulty-reasoning hits from 745 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 23.6% and a BS Rank of 7% (20,368 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the article peer group.

Nick Shirley's Latest Fraud Video Is Another Gold Mine 
Trump Rips 'Maggot Hagerman' for Spreading 'Fake News' in New Book on His... 
Man Who Accused Hunter Biden of $800M Iran Bribery Scheme Now Owes Him... 
'Emergency!' 
Actor Randolph Mantooth Has Died, but His Career Helped Save Countless Lives 
Tim Walz's Response to the Deportation of a Child Sex Offender Is Disgusting 
The Inhumanity of Surrogacy 
Iran Closes Strait of Hormuz, Fires on Commercial Ship 
Carbondale Store Owner Gets 46 Months for SNAP Fraud, Money Laundering Scheme 
Permanent Residency, Permanent Grift: Dominican National Admits ID Theft Scheme 
Former Epoch Times CFO Pleads Guilty to Laundering $67 Million 
DOJ Opens Investigation Into Texas Police Department Who Threatened Street Preacher With A... 
The State Department Just Canceled a Baffling Meeting Between a Mamdani-Aide and Iran 
This Democrat's Reaction to the Houston ICE Self-Defense Shooting Was Hilariously Dumb 
DHS Creates 'Deportation Airline' to Carry-Out 24/7 Deportation Flights 
A man has been sentenced to four years in federal prison for submitting—and teaching others how to submit— false COVID-relief loan applications on behalf of themselves and others who paid kickbacks to him and his co-schemers. 
James Townsend allegedly schemed to fraudulently obtain more than $2 million in small business loans under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) . 
In 2021, Townsend submitted and caused to be submitted more than 100 applications for loans under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) on behalf of dozens of sole proprietorships purportedly operated by Townsend and others. 
The applications contained numerous false statements and misrepresentations regarding the purported proprietorships’ operations, including the number of employees, gross revenues, and payroll expenses. 
In reality, the applicants did not operate sole proprietorships, nor did they employ any individuals or incur operational expenses such as payroll. 
For each successful fraudulent loan, Townsend and his co-schemers received kickback payments from the loan applicants. 
Townsend pleaded guilty earlier this year to a federal wire fraud charge. 
On June 24, 2026, U.S. 
District Chief Judge Virginia M. 
Kendall sentenced Townsend to four years in federal prison and ordered him to pay full restitution. 
Federal Judge Sentences Man to Four Years in Prison for $2 Million COVID-Relief Fraud @FBIChicago https://t.co/Zt2Fd9ZqIg 
 U.S. 
Attorney’s Office (NDIL) (@NDILnews) July 10, 2026 
Townsend also recruited and directed co-defendants Sarah Stokes, 37, of Crestwood, Ill., and Amanda Heller, 40, of Crestwood, Ill., to find putative borrowers, complete and submit fraudulent applications on their behalf, and then share the proceeds. 
Stokes and Heller each pleaded guilty to a federal wire fraud charge . 
Stokes was sentenced in November 2025 to 18 months in federal prison. 
Heller’s sentencing is set for Oct. 
28, 2026. 
Under the leadership of United States Attorney Andrew S. 
Boutros and consistent with the Administration’s priorities to identify, investigate, and prosecute criminal fraud in the federal government entitlement and benefit programs, the U.S. 
Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois has been taking a fresh look at COVID-19 fraud. 
U.S. 
Attorney Boutros announced Townsend’s sentence along with Lucas Rothaar, Acting Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Field Office of the FBI. 
Valuable assistance was provided by the Illinois Attorney General’s Office. 
 Defendant’s crime was serious,” Assistant U.S. 
Attorney Adam L. 
Rosenbloom argued in the government’s sentencing memorandum in Townsend’s case. 
“He defrauded the government of millions of dollars meant to help regular Americans survive a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic.” 
On April 7, 2026, the Department of Justice announced the creation of the National Fraud Enforcement Division (“Fraud Division”). 
The Fraud Division is laser-focused on investigating and prosecuting those who commit fraud against the American people. 
The Department’s work to combat fraud supports President Trump’s Task Force to Eliminate Fraud, a whole-of-government effort chaired by Vice President J.D. 
Vance to eliminate fraud, waste, and abuse within Federal benefit programs. 
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? 
Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
DOJ Opens Investigation Into Texas Police Department Who Threatened Street Preacher With Arrest 
Trump Rips 'Maggot Hagerman' for Spreading 'Fake News' in New Book on His Presidency 
Trending on Townhall Videos 
Watch: Bison Hurls Man 8 Feet High in Yellowstone Campground 
FAKE NEWS! 
Ro Khanna Goes Full Greta Thunberg With 'Detention' Stunt on a Trip to the West Bank 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.7%Scott McClallen: 2.4%Townhall: 5.3%Confirmation Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Scott McClallen: 1.5%Townhall: 2.8%Availability Heuristic2.6%This article: 1.3%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic1.3%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.4%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.3%Townhall: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Scott McClallen: 7.7%Townhall: 11.2%Framing Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.6%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 1.4%Optimism Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.9%Townhall: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 18.5%Scott McClallen: 8.5%Townhall: 13.5%Negativity Bias18.5%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.9%Townhall: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Scott McClallen: 2.8%Townhall: 4.6%In-Group Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.9%Townhall: 3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Scott McClallen: 1.4%Townhall: 1.8%Halo Effect3.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.4%Townhall: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.5%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 1.3%Recency Bias0.5%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.3%Townhall: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.1%Scott McClallen: 1.5%Townhall: 5.0%Ad Hominem9.1%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 2.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.5%Scott McClallen: 4.2%Townhall: 4.4%Appeal to Authority7.5%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 1.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.7%Scott McClallen: 2.3%Townhall: 9.1%Hasty Generalization1.7%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.8%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.3%Bandwagon2.8%This article: 16.9%Scott McClallen: 10.3%Townhall: 11.1%Appeal to Emotion16.9%This article: 2.0%Scott McClallen: 1.1%Townhall: 2.2%Begging the Question2.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.4%Townhall: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 1.3%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division1.3%This article: 3.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 1.4%Anecdotal3.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.7%Townhall: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.9%Scott McClallen: 2.0%Townhall: 3.4%Unattributed Quote0.9%This article: 3.6%Scott McClallen: 3.2%Townhall: 3.0%Quote-first Misdirection3.6%This article: 10.5%Scott McClallen: 5.5%Townhall: 16.1%Biased Writer Voice10.5%This article: 2.3%Scott McClallen: 4.0%Townhall: 5.6%Indoctrination2.3%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Scott McClallen: 5.5%Townhall: 13.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias7.5%This article: 3.6%Scott McClallen: 3.8%Townhall: 5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.6%

745 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker2.3%attributed speech728writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAdam L. Rosenbloom • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Adam L. Rosenbloom

100%flagged-word coverage
17 attributed words100% of attributed speech41% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-10.7 ptsWriter: 10.7%Adam L. Rosenbloom: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -7.7 ptsWriter: 7.7%Adam L. Rosenbloom: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.7 ptsWriter: 3.7%Adam L. Rosenbloom: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.7 ptsWriter: 3.7%Adam L. Rosenbloom: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Adam L. Rosenbloom: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-1.0 ptsWriter: 1.0%Adam L. Rosenbloom: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.