404 Media48%

Tidal Says It Won’t Pay Royalties for AI-Generated Music 17%

By Matthew Gault34%

6/29/2026, 12:33:49 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 1,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 684 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32.7% and a BS Rank of 17% (18,180 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the article peer group.

Music streaming service Tidal announced it won’t pay royalties for AI-generated music in an email to users and an announcement on its website published Monday. 
“Tidal’s priority is ensuring royalties go to original works directly produced, written, and performed by people,” the announcement reads. 
“We will therefore not knowingly attribute royalties to music we identify as wholly AI-generated.” 
Like much of the internet, music streaming services are awash in AI-generated slop. 
Spotify promised to fight AI spam with labeling and filtering but also embraced the broader trend of AI music. 
AI-generated bands like The Velvet Sundown and Breaking Rust have millions of listens on Spotify and make the service money. 
In May, Spotify announced a deal with Universal that would let fans create “covers and remixes of their favorite songs.” 
Soon Spotify customers will be able to push a button and discover what Metallica would sound like if it were a reggae band. 
Tidal is trying something different. 
The streaming service isn’t a giant in the field  Apple Music, YouTube, and Spotify dominate the charts  but it’s built a reputation by collaborating with artists, giving them a bigger cut of the streaming profits, and focusing on delivering high quality versions of audio. 
Tidal is the streaming service for listeners obsessed with bit-rate and FLAC. 
It’s for people who have $200 digital-to-analog converters next to their computer. 
The company said it won’t pay for “wholly” AI-generated music but it also said it won’t remove AI-tainted music from the platform entirely. 
Like Spotify before it, Tidal said it’s going to work to identify the AI slop on its platform, label it, and hold AI-generated music to a “higher standard of content integrity.” 
Spotify said something similar last year, but there are still plenty of unlabeled AI-generated tracks on the platform. 
Tidal also said it won’t remove AI-tainted music entirely. 
“Artists should have the freedom to create with AI tools, and listeners should have the autonomy to choose the type of content they consume,” it said. 
As of this writing, The Velvet Sundown and Breaking Rust are both live on Tidal. 
Breaking Rust’s bio identified it as AI-generated country music, but The Velvet Sundown had no bio at all. 
“Tidal will not allow music that is 100% AI-generated to be monetized. 
No royalties will go to such releases, nor will AI-generated uploads be eligible for direct-to-fan sales,” the company said in an email to its users. 
It elaborated on its website. 
“Starting today, AI-generated music will not be monetizable,” it said. 
“We are only in the beginning of the era of AI-generated music. 
We acknowledge the ongoing debate regarding whether certain AI-generated music (e.g. 
AI-generated music developed from fairly and properly licensed models) should be entitled to earn royalties. 
This debate will continue as the technology advances and rightsholders and AI music platforms develop licensing models.” 
It’s unclear if The Velvet Sundown and other bands like it will keep making money on Tidal. 
The company told 404 Media that it’s working with an external partner to manage detection and that “wholly AI-generated” was defined as a song where every component of the track was made using generative AI. 
“Our detection tools will determine how specific tracks and artists will be treated from July 15,” Tidal told 404 Media in an email. 
“The impact to royalties comes into effect starting July 15 so we don't have numbers to share just yet.” 
On June 28, the day before Tidal’s announcement, The Velvet Sundown released a cover of Dolly Parton’s “I Will Always Love You” on Spotify and Tidal. 
It’s atrocious and it’s not labeled as AI-generated on either service. 
“We exist to confuse music journalists, comfort robots, and help Spotify executives sleep at night,” says the frontpage of The Velvet Sundown’s website. 
“We were basically built for it, engineered to fill playlists, avoid royalties, and haunt your Discover Weekly like a ghost with good taste. 
Is it art? 
Is it a loophole? 
Either way, it streams beautifully." 
Update 6/29/26: This story was updated to include comments from Tidal. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.4%Matthew Gault: 3.8%404 Media: 3.5%Confirmation Bias0.4%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.7%404 Media: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Matthew Gault: 2.2%404 Media: 3.8%Availability Heuristic6.6%This article: 1.8%Matthew Gault: 1.1%404 Media: 1.6%Representativeness Heuristic1.8%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.5%404 Media: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Matthew Gault: 1.2%404 Media: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias2.8%This article: 10.7%Matthew Gault: 4.2%404 Media: 5.6%Framing Effect10.7%This article: 2.8%Matthew Gault: 0.6%404 Media: 0.4%Loss Aversion2.8%This article: 6.7%Matthew Gault: 0.4%404 Media: 0.6%Status Quo Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.0%404 Media: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Matthew Gault: 1.0%404 Media: 2.8%Optimism Bias2.5%This article: 3.1%Matthew Gault: 1.4%404 Media: 1.6%Pessimism Bias3.1%This article: 17.4%Matthew Gault: 12.1%404 Media: 11.5%Negativity Bias17.4%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 1.0%404 Media: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.7%404 Media: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.1%404 Media: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.2%404 Media: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.2%404 Media: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Matthew Gault: 0.6%404 Media: 1.0%Halo Effect7.5%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.1%404 Media: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.0%404 Media: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.0%Matthew Gault: 0.9%404 Media: 1.0%Recency Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.1%404 Media: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.0%404 Media: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Matthew Gault: 0.7%404 Media: 0.3%Ad Hominem3.4%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.2%404 Media: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 3.9%404 Media: 3.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 1.0%Matthew Gault: 1.3%404 Media: 1.3%False Dilemma1.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 1.9%404 Media: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.0%404 Media: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.3%Matthew Gault: 6.4%404 Media: 7.8%Hasty Generalization6.3%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.4%404 Media: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 1.1%404 Media: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 4.5%404 Media: 4.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 2.8%Matthew Gault: 0.9%404 Media: 0.7%Begging the Question2.8%This article: 3.8%Matthew Gault: 1.7%404 Media: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.8%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.2%404 Media: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.3%404 Media: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.0%404 Media: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 6.7%Matthew Gault: 0.2%404 Media: 0.2%Composition/Division6.7%This article: 6.3%Matthew Gault: 2.9%404 Media: 2.9%Anecdotal6.3%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.0%404 Media: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 13.5%Matthew Gault: 1.6%404 Media: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)13.5%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.0%404 Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.6%Matthew Gault: 0.2%404 Media: 0.1%Middle Ground1.6%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.4%404 Media: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.4%Matthew Gault: 0.2%404 Media: 0.1%Special Pleading3.4%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.4%404 Media: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 26.6%Matthew Gault: 4.5%404 Media: 2.6%Unattributed Quote26.6%This article: 9.5%Matthew Gault: 1.4%404 Media: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection9.5%This article: 14.8%Matthew Gault: 9.6%404 Media: 11.5%Biased Writer Voice14.8%This article: 1.0%Matthew Gault: 0.4%404 Media: 1.5%Indoctrination1.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.6%404 Media: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.0%404 Media: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Gault: 0.3%404 Media: 2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

684 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers42%attributed speech400writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageTidal • 19 words • 100.0% coverageTidal • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageTidal • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageTidal • 12 words • 100.0% coverageTidal • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageTidal • 10 words • 100.0% coverageTidal • 12 words • 100.0% coverageTidal • 11 words • 0.0% coverageTidal • 15 words • 0.0% coverageTidal • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageTidal • 35 words • 100.0% coverageTidal • 23 words • 100.0% coverageTidal • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageThe Velvet Sundown • 23 words • 100.0% coverageThe Velvet Sundown • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

The Velvet Sundown

100%flagged-word coverage
46 attributed words16% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%The Velvet Sundown: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%The Velvet Sundown: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-25.3 ptsWriter: 25.3%The Velvet Sundown: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%The Velvet Sundown: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.