MS NOW⁠95%

MS NOW Exclusive: SC Rep. Jim Clyburn tells all after State Senate blocks GOP-rigged voting map ⁠97%

5/28/2026, 11:49:44 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 90.2% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 316 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 95.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (678 of 20,153 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 96.60% of the article peer group.

MS NOW’s Eugene Daniels shares an exclusive clip of his sit-down with South Carolina Congressman Jim Clyburn, days after the state legislature struck down the GOP’s gerrymandered congressional map that would have eliminated his district. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%MS NOW: 7.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 3.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 90.2%MS NOW: 15.5%Framing Effect90.2%This article: 68.6%MS NOW: 0.7%Loss Aversion68.6%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 3.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 90.2%MS NOW: 19.4%Negativity Bias90.2%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 3.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 4.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 68.6%MS NOW: 5.4%Appeal to Authority68.6%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 8.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 21.6%MS NOW: 9.9%Appeal to Emotion21.6%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 68.6%MS NOW: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)68.6%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 21.6%MS NOW: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)21.6%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 21.6%MS NOW: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection21.6%This article: 90.2%MS NOW: 14.3%Biased Writer Voice90.2%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 78.4%MS NOW: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…78.4%

51 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers100%attributed speech0writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
MS NOW • 5 words • 100.0% coverageJim Clyburn • 11 words • 100.0% coverageEugene Daniels • 35 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Eugene Daniels

100%flagged-word coverage
35 attributed words69% of attributed speech0% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Eugene Daniels: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Eugene Daniels: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.