Don't Get Charged for a Subscription After Preordering 'Grand Theft Auto VI' 39%

By Jake Peterson31%

7/2/2026, 12:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Indoctrination, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 57.4% saturation with 295 hits. Analysis detected 1,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 514 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.3% and a BS Rank of 39% (13,516 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the article peer group.

It might seem improbable to anyone who has spent years waiting for it, but Grand Theft Auto VI is nearly here. 
In fact, the game is currently available to preorder for PS5 and Xbox through Rockstar . 
While the game sadly doesn't have a true physical edition, you can choose from either the Standard Edition for $79.99, or the Ultimate Edition for $99.99, the latter of which comes with a laundry list of add-ons to justify the higher price. 
Both editions also include something you might not have budgeted for: a recurring subscription to GTA+. 
Grand Theft Auto: VI comes with a free month of GTA+ 
No matter which edition of GTA VI you preorder, you'll get a free month of GTA+, Rockstar's online subscription service. 
According to the company's preorder page, GTA+ will net you a monthly GTA$500,000 deposit into your GTA Online bank account-that's in-game " Grand Theft Auto dollars," not USD, obviously. 
You also get Shark Cards with 15% bonus GTA$, both free and discounted GTA Online vehicles, and access to "classic" Rockstar games, among other perks. 
(Those games seem to include a large percentage of the Rockstar library, including Red Dead Redemption , Bully , GTA: The Trilogy - The Definitive Edition , L.A. 
Noire , and, now, even Grand Theft Auto V .) 
GTA VI doesn't come out until Nov. 19, but that GTA+ credit is valid as soon as you preorder the game. 
You might have to wait until Thanksgiving to sink your teeth into the latest interpretation of Vice City, but you can start playing GTA Online (or any of the Rockstar games available under the subscription) right away, or you can choose to activate it after the game comes out (or by March 2027). 
Free subscriptions are always welcome, but they're also dangerous. 
Anyone who has ever signed up for a free trial of anything knows how easy it is to forget about it-until the charge comes through on your credit card. 
That could be the eventual case for thousands, if not millions of GTA VI preorderers. 
As Gamespot highlights , your GTA+ subscription auto-renews, which means you'll be on the hook for $7.99 one month after activating it. 
That means if you redeem your free GTA+ subscription and you don't want to pay for it, you'll need to cancel it before it automatically renews. 
How to cancel your GTA+ subscription 
To cancel GTA+, you'll need to return to the store where you purchased the subscription-or, in this case, the platform you preordered the game on. 
That might include any of the following: 
PlayStation Store: https://store.playstation.com/ 
Microsoft Store: https://account.microsoft.com/ 
Rockstar & Epic: https://store.rockstargames.com/gta-plus/manage 
Steam: https://store.steampowered.com/account/ 
To be clear, your GTA+ subscription doesn't start as soon as you preorder the game. 
You need to redeem it first. 
If you intend to use it, make sure you do so before March 31, 2027, or you'll lose access to the free month. 
After that, you'll need to cancel before the month is up to avoid being charged. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.1%Jake Peterson: 1.4%Lifehacker: 2.4%Confirmation Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.3%Lifehacker: 2.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 17.3%Jake Peterson: 3.1%Lifehacker: 3.1%Availability Heuristic17.3%This article: 5.4%Jake Peterson: 0.8%Lifehacker: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic5.4%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.4%Lifehacker: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 3.1%Lifehacker: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.2%Jake Peterson: 3.8%Lifehacker: 4.9%Framing Effect14.2%This article: 17.9%Jake Peterson: 2.9%Lifehacker: 2.2%Loss Aversion17.9%This article: 4.9%Jake Peterson: 0.5%Lifehacker: 0.9%Status Quo Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.1%Lifehacker: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 22.0%Jake Peterson: 4.2%Lifehacker: 4.3%Optimism Bias22.0%This article: 8.2%Jake Peterson: 1.6%Lifehacker: 1.3%Pessimism Bias8.2%This article: 4.9%Jake Peterson: 3.3%Lifehacker: 4.5%Negativity Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 1.9%Lifehacker: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.2%Lifehacker: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.0%Lifehacker: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.6%Lifehacker: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.0%Lifehacker: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 13.0%Jake Peterson: 1.8%Lifehacker: 4.0%Halo Effect13.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.0%Lifehacker: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.0%Lifehacker: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.9%Lifehacker: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Jake Peterson: 0.3%Lifehacker: 0.3%Primacy Effect6.2%This article: 2.9%Jake Peterson: 0.0%Lifehacker: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.0%Lifehacker: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.0%Lifehacker: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.0%Jake Peterson: 2.7%Lifehacker: 3.7%Appeal to Authority13.0%This article: 20.0%Jake Peterson: 1.6%Lifehacker: 1.7%False Dilemma20.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.4%Lifehacker: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.2%Lifehacker: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.0%Jake Peterson: 4.3%Lifehacker: 5.4%Hasty Generalization16.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.1%Lifehacker: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 10.3%Jake Peterson: 0.7%Lifehacker: 0.8%Bandwagon10.3%This article: 12.8%Jake Peterson: 2.1%Lifehacker: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion12.8%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.3%Lifehacker: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 1.4%Lifehacker: 1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.0%Lifehacker: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 12.5%Jake Peterson: 0.4%Lifehacker: 0.3%Burden of Proof12.5%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.0%Lifehacker: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.1%Lifehacker: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.6%Jake Peterson: 3.9%Lifehacker: 3.2%Anecdotal8.6%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.1%Lifehacker: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 19.3%Jake Peterson: 2.1%Lifehacker: 2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)19.3%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.0%Lifehacker: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.2%Lifehacker: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.1%Lifehacker: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.2%Lifehacker: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.0%Lifehacker: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.6%Jake Peterson: 0.9%Lifehacker: 1.1%Unattributed Quote5.6%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.0%Lifehacker: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 57.4%Jake Peterson: 6.1%Lifehacker: 9.2%Biased Writer Voice57.4%This article: 24.5%Jake Peterson: 6.8%Lifehacker: 6.2%Indoctrination24.5%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.0%Lifehacker: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Peterson: 0.0%Lifehacker: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 42.4%Jake Peterson: 4.6%Lifehacker: 13.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…42.4%

514 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers9.9%attributed speech463writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageRockstar • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageGamespot • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Rockstar

100%flagged-word coverage
29 attributed words57% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Rockstar: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +63.9 ptsWriter: 36.1%Rockstar: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-59.0 ptsWriter: 59.0%Rockstar: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-27.2 ptsWriter: 27.2%Rockstar: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.