Supremes deny State’s Attorney Vekos license reinstatement 18%

By Guy Page12%

7/31/2026, 4:34:11 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Quote-first Misdirection, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 43.3% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 240 faulty-reasoning hits from 134 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.9% and a BS Rank of 18% (23,441 of 28,475 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 82.30% of the article peer group.

By Michael Donoghue, Vermont News First 
The Vermont Supreme Court has rejected a request by Addison County State’s Attorney Eva Vekos to have her law license reinstated. 
The rejection comes one day after Vermont News FIrst broke the story about the only licensed lawyer left in the Addison County office is departing next Friday. 
In a 4-page decision released today, the Vermont Supreme Court agreed 5-0 that reinstatement of the license for Vekos was improper. 
Associate Justice Christina Nolan, who had voted initially against the suspension of the license in April, wrote in her own decision today that she still believes suspension was the wrong decision. 
However, she wrote she agrees with the rest of the court on denying the appeal seeking reinstatement. 
Here is the ruling: 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Guy Page: 1.4%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 3.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 2.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 4.8%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 1.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.8%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.3%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 15.7%Guy Page: 2.6%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 3.8%Framing Effect15.7%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.2%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.9%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.4%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 1.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 1.1%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 3.4%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 4.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.6%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.9%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 43.3%Guy Page: 2.7%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.7%Recency Bias43.3%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.6%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.8%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.7%Guy Page: 2.2%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 1.7%Appeal to Authority15.7%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 2.2%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 3.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.4%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.6%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 1.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 20.1%Guy Page: 1.1%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)20.1%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.9%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 1.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.7%Guy Page: 1.8%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.7%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.7%Guy Page: 0.4%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.2%Middle Ground12.7%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 2.9%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 20.1%Guy Page: 0.9%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection20.1%This article: 38.8%Guy Page: 3.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice38.8%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Page: 0.0%Vermont Daily Chronicle: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

134 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers51%attributed speech65writer words
Selected voice

Christina Nolan

100%flagged-word coverage
48 attributed words70% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Biased Writer Voice+32.3 ptsWriter: 32.3%Christina Nolan: 64.6%64.6%Quote-first Misdirection-41.5 ptsWriter: 41.5%Christina Nolan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.