WIRED16%

OpenAI’s Chief Futurist Is Leaving the Company 3%

By Maxwell Zeff0%

7/7/2026, 2:28:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Anecdotal, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 342 hits. Analysis detected 1,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,137 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 14.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (21,352 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the article peer group.

OpenAI’s chief futurist, Joshua Achiam, notified colleagues on Tuesday that he is leaving the company later this month after nearly nine years, WIRED has learned. 
Achiam, who previously led a team tasked with upholding the organization’s nonprofit mission , told OpenAI staff that his departure was not motivated by any specific reason, but was something he’s been thinking about for a while. 
“The world is in on the secret now and it feels possible to work on the mission from outside the walls of a frontier lab,” Achiam said in a note to staff obtained by WIRED. 
“I believe we can get to a world of peace, unprecedented prosperity, and unimaginable possibilities, social and scientific. 
Whatever I do next, I will continue to work with you on making this vision real.” 
OpenAI has not yet announced if anyone will fill Achiam’s role, which sat at the intersection of the company’s AI safety and policy teams, and involved studying the potential harms and benefits caused by the rise of artificial intelligence. 
Achiam worked with senior company leaders, including global affairs chief Chris Lehane , to advocate for government regulations aligned with OpenAI’s mission: to ensure that AGI benefits all of humanity. 
OpenAI has reorganized its safety, product, and research teams numerous times since ChatGPT launched in 2022, after which the company grew rapidly from a small research lab into a massive tech company. 
In 2024, OpenAI announced the formation of a “mission alignment team” led by Achiam that was tasked with upholding the company’s mission. 
OpenAI disbanded the group in February and announced that Achiam would be taking on a new role as chief futurist. 
In the last year, OpenAI has worked to bridge the gap between its AI research and policy teams as part of an effort to develop rules and standards that anticipate where its technology is headed. 
As the two departments began collaborating more closely, several OpenAI researchers, including Boaz Barak, Noam Brown, and Adrien Ecoffet say they have become more involved in policy work. 
Former White House AI adviser Dean Ball started at OpenAI this week as the company's head of strategic futures, and he will briefly overlap with Achiam. 
Ball is also expected to work with researchers and policy leaders in his role. 
Achiam is the latest safety-focused leader to depart OpenAI, joining a growing list of exits as the company prepares to go public . 
Jan Leike, who co-led OpenAI’s Superalignment team researching how to keep advanced AI models under human control, left to join Anthropic in 2024. 
That same year, head of policy research Miles Brundage and Steven Adler, who led research on dangerous capabilities of AI models, both departed OpenAI to found nonprofits that advocate for AI labs to adhere to strong safety and security standards. 
Andrea Vallone , who led OpenAI’s research on how ChatGPT should respond to users experiencing mental or emotional distress , left to join Leike’s team at Anthropic at the end of 2025. 
After joining OpenAI as an intern in 2017, Achiam went on to become a research scientist focused on AI safety. 
He was known internally as a stalwart defender of OpenAI’s safety-focused mission, but was also controversial for his occasional criticisms of the broader AI safety community. 
Earlier this year, he testified in federal court that he interrupted Elon Musk’s parting speech when he left OpenAI in 2018, remarking that the then-billionaire’s plan to develop AGI at Tesla could come at the expense of safety. 
Musk allegedly responded by calling Achiam a “jackass,” a moment that Dario Amodei (now the CEO of Anthropic) and David Luan (who went on to become the head of Amazon’s AGI lab) commemorated by gifting Achiam a statue of a golden donkey’s rear end , inscribed with the words, “Never stop being a jackass for safety.” 
In your inbox: Inside WIRED’s newsroom with Katie Drummond 
Trump mocked Zuckerberg and Bezos by showing off fawning texts 
Big Story: I found Jesus at a drone show 
Apple is making your older iPhone run faster and stay alive longer 
WIRED event: PepsiCo’s once-in-a-generation transformation 
Maxwell Zeff is a senior writer at WIRED covering the business of artificial intelligence. 
He was previously a senior reporter with TechCrunch, where he broke news on startups and leaders driving the AI boom. 
Before that, Zeff covered AI policy and content moderation for Gizmodo and wrote some of Bloomberg’s ... 
Read More 
Maine’s Senate Race Implodes, Meta’s Threads Rivals Musk’s X, and the Trump Phone Arrives 
Today on Uncanny Valley , we unpack the political debacle unfolding in Maine surrounding the campaign of Democratic candidate Graham Platner. 
Come to Our WIRED@NIGHT02 Film Screening! 
See the documentary The Oldest Person in the World before it’s in theaters. 
Anthropic Wants You to Pay Up for Claude Fable 5 
Claude subscribers must soon pay usage-based fees to access Anthropic’s best consumer AI model—a sign that the golden era of AI subscriptions is ending. 
The 1X Neo Robot Has Freaky Fast Fingers 
The soft, oddly intimate home-chore robot has been given some very tactile hands. 
A Majority of European Lawmakers Voted Against Letting Big Tech Read Our Messages. 
They’re Going to Anyway 
Companies will once again be allowed to scan citizens’ personal texts, emails, and social media messages via the “Chat Control” bill to find child abuse material online. 
Slate’s Gray $25,000 Truck Just Got a Crayola Makeover 
The Bezos-backed automaker building America’s cheapest electric truck is teaming up with the crayon company in a bid to brighten its rides. 
Make ours Razzmatazz. 
Data Centers Are Quietly Taking Over Texas. 
The Pollution Could Be Catastrophic 
Thousands of new fossil-fuel power sources are quietly firing up across the state to power the AI boom, thanks to a regulatory loophole, leaving residents feeling blindsided. 
Which Microsoft Surface Is Best for You? 
With pricing in flux and new models available, here’s which Surface Laptop and Surface Pro to buy. 
Influencers Are Promoting $50 Straws They Claim Will Protect Against Electromagnetic Radiation 
“EMF straws” and similar products are being sold as a way to block electromagnetic frequencies that come from common electronic devices, even without scientific evidence that they work. 
Self-Driving Cars Are Interfering With First Responders. 
Feds Aren’t Happy 
NHTSA administrator Jonathan Morris called reports that self-driving cars had driven into emergency scenes and blocked ambulances and firefighters “unacceptable.” 
The $28 Million Mistake That Inspired Estonia’s AI ‘Fuckup Finder’ 
A single wording mistake cost the government millions. 
Now Estonia is using AI to spot legal errors before they become law—and to automate more of the state. 
Madison Square Garden Kept a List of Gay Celebrities 
An MSG database tracked and categorized hundreds of celebs, famous Knicks superfans, and even some of Taylor Swift’s wedding guests. 
Labels included “LGBTQIA,” “DO NOT HOST,” and low to high “risk.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.5%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 1.9%Confirmation Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 2.9%Availability Heuristic3.5%This article: 3.5%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic3.5%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Maxwell Zeff: 1.2%WIRED: 4.3%Framing Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.8%Maxwell Zeff: 1.6%WIRED: 2.1%Optimism Bias8.8%This article: 2.9%Maxwell Zeff: 1.5%WIRED: 1.4%Pessimism Bias2.9%This article: 30.1%Maxwell Zeff: 3.5%WIRED: 5.9%Negativity Bias30.1%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 1.0%In-Group Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Maxwell Zeff: 3.6%WIRED: 1.9%Halo Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 1.0%Recency Bias2.3%This article: 4.9%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.3%Primacy Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 2.5%WIRED: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.9%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 3.2%Appeal to Authority8.9%This article: 1.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 1.1%False Dilemma1.0%This article: 0.4%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.4%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 4.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.2%Maxwell Zeff: 2.4%WIRED: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion6.2%This article: 3.1%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.3%Begging the Question3.1%This article: 11.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.8%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 3.6%Anecdotal12.8%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.3%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.3%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 15.7%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 1.2%Unattributed Quote15.7%This article: 8.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection8.0%This article: 3.8%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 4.0%Biased Writer Voice3.8%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maxwell Zeff: 0.0%WIRED: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.5%Maxwell Zeff: 1.6%WIRED: 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.5%

1137 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers17%attributed speech942writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageJoshua Achiam • 37 words • 100.0% coverageJoshua Achiam • 35 words • 100.0% coverageJoshua Achiam • 18 words • 100.0% coverageJoshua Achiam • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageOpenAI • 22 words • 0.0% coverageOpenAI • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 56 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageApple • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWIRED • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageAnthropic • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Morris • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jonathan Morris

100%flagged-word coverage
20 attributed words10% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote-15.1 ptsWriter: 15.1%Jonathan Morris: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -12.7 ptsWriter: 12.7%Jonathan Morris: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.9 ptsWriter: 5.9%Jonathan Morris: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%Jonathan Morris: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.