Clive trail reopens after almost 2 years of closure for construction 10%

By Kyle Werner3%

8/3/2026, 4:28:26 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Loss Aversion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 279 faulty-reasoning hits from 257 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,354 of 28,084 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the article peer group.

After nearly two years of being split up by construction on Interstate 35, Clive's Greenbelt Trail is open to walkers, runners and cyclists. 
Greenbelt Trail, a 11.3-mile-long trail that stretches from 73rd to 156th Streets and winds along Walnut Creek, has been partially closed since October 2024 due to construction that is part of the Hickman Road interchange project. 
While under construction, because of heavy equipment, it was deemed unsafe for people to pass underneath the interstate bridge. 
A lengthy detour was in place for trail users during construction. 
More: Clive kicks off 50th festival anniversary with new Greenbelt Landing 
Construction was initially expected to be complete by the end of 2025, but weather and a sewer project parallel to the trail pushed back when the trail could safely reopen. 
The trail officially reopened to the public on Friday, July 31, according to a news release from Clive Assistant City Manager Pete De Kock. 
"The City of Clive is excited to welcome people back to the Greenbelt Trail," De Kock said in the release. 
"We appreciate the patience of residents, visitors, and all trail users during the long closure while interstate construction was underway." 
On Saturday, Aug. 1, people were already taking to the trail, riding their bikes and walking their dogs. 
The city said visitors should be cautious using the trail since some construction vehicles remain on site. 
Kyle Werner is the breaking news and public safety reporter for the Register. 
Reach him at kwerner@registermedia.com. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 1.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 3.0%The Des Moines Register: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Kyle Werner: 0.9%The Des Moines Register: 1.5%Availability Heuristic7.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 1.4%The Des Moines Register: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Kyle Werner: 1.0%The Des Moines Register: 2.4%Framing Effect7.8%This article: 8.9%Kyle Werner: 1.1%The Des Moines Register: 1.1%Loss Aversion8.9%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 19.5%Kyle Werner: 2.4%The Des Moines Register: 3.8%Optimism Bias19.5%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.0%Kyle Werner: 1.7%The Des Moines Register: 1.6%Negativity Bias14.0%This article: 7.8%Kyle Werner: 1.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Kyle Werner: 1.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.6%Halo Effect7.8%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Kyle Werner: 0.5%The Des Moines Register: 0.4%Recency Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.3%Kyle Werner: 1.2%The Des Moines Register: 1.5%Appeal to Authority9.3%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.0%Kyle Werner: 0.9%The Des Moines Register: 1.1%Hasty Generalization7.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 2.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.4%Kyle Werner: 0.9%The Des Moines Register: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.4%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 1.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.8%Kyle Werner: 1.0%The Des Moines Register: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice7.8%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.0%The Des Moines Register: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Werner: 0.2%The Des Moines Register: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

257 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker16%attributed speech217writer words
Selected voice

Pete De Kock

100%flagged-word coverage
40 attributed words100% of attributed speech65% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice+50.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Pete De Kock: 50.0%50.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.