WAMU15%

Hot Jazz Saturday Night: July 11, 2026 6%

7/10/2026, 1:01:31 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Primacy Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 72.3% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 221 faulty-reasoning hits from 65 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (20,587 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the article peer group.

This week, on Hot Jazz Saturday Night, expect the customary dose of gems from the 1920s and 1930s, but we also feature pianist Ross Tompkins, who spent more than two decades in the TONIGHT SHOW band. 
And there may be some leftover fireworks coming from the turntable. 
As Fats Waller used to say, “One never knows, do one?” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%WAMU: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.9%WAMU: 2.9%Availability Heuristic16.9%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 55.4%WAMU: 5.2%Framing Effect55.4%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 16.9%WAMU: 1.5%Optimism Bias16.9%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 2.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 7.4%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 55.4%WAMU: 0.4%Primacy Effect55.4%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 72.3%WAMU: 2.8%Appeal to Authority72.3%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 4.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.9%WAMU: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion16.9%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 2.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 16.9%WAMU: 1.2%Unattributed Quote16.9%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 72.3%WAMU: 2.7%Biased Writer Voice72.3%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 16.9%WAMU: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…16.9%

65 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker17%attributed speech54writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageFats Waller • 11 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Fats Waller

100%flagged-word coverage
11 attributed words100% of attributed speech87% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Fats Waller: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-87.0 ptsWriter: 87.0%Fats Waller: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -20.4 ptsWriter: 20.4%Fats Waller: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.