Why allergy season in the Northwest is nothing to sneeze at 36%

By Vaughan Jones0% Patricia Murphy0% Sami West0%

4/1/2026, 3:09:43 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 1,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 663 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.7% and a BS Rank of 36% (14,215 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 64.90% of the article peer group.

There are a couple of ways to tell it’s spring in Seattle: The cherry blossoms and flowers are blooming  and so are your allergies. 
If it seems like your runny nose, sneezing, watery eyes, and all those other lovely allergy symptoms are sticking around longer every year, it’s not just you. 
A recent analysis by Climate Central, a climate change research group, found allergy season in the Seattle-Tacoma area has gotten about 12 days longer since 1970. 
Dr. 
Rahool Davé, an asthma, allergy, and immunology specialist at Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, has seen this extended season firsthand. 
“We see it in the clinic on a daily basis,” Davé told KUOW’s Seattle Now. 
“We see a huge surge of our patients here who say, ‘Woah, I feel like I’m being hit by a bus.’” 
And, Davé said, these patients often report never having such intense allergies earlier in their lives, or even a couple years ago. 
“Folks say, ‘Hey, you know, a couple years ago, I got a couple sniffles, but it didn’t really do much to me. 
Now, I feel like I’m completely incapacitated,’’’ Davé said. 
What’s causing these extended, more intense allergy seasons? 
In part, climate change, according to Climate Central. 
As the globe warms, there are more “freeze-free” days each year  which, in turn, gives plants more time to grow and release pollen. 
Although this trend is happening across the nation, in every climate region, it’s the worst here in the Northwest. 
Compared to the early 1970s, the region now sees an average of 31 more “freeze-free days” every year. 
While the Pacific Northwest is known for its iconic cherry blossoms  and the blooms often coincide with the start of allergy season  Davé wants to clear up a common misconception. 
“Don’t blame the cherry blossoms,” Davé said. 
“They’re beautiful, but they’re not the ones causing your allergies.” 
The two biggest culprits are actually alder and birch trees, according to Davé. 
“They make up the vast majority of tree pollens here in the Pacific Northwest,” he explained. 
And unfortunately, Davé doesn’t see the situation improving anytime soon. 
“I feel sometimes like a broken record saying this is going to be the worst pollen season on record,” he said. 
“I’ve repeated myself multiple times over the past several years. 
It’s this kind of cycle of worsening pollen burden.” 
Although there could be a “plateau” because there are only so many trees that can blossom, at that point, Davé said the damage will have already been done. 
So many people will have already been exposed to the pollen and will have a higher chance of developing allergies. 
So, what can we do about it? 
Davé had a few tips. 
While it’s tempting to open the windows as another long, gloomy winter comes to a close, Davé warned against that. 
“Letting those pollens into the house will definitely expose you, even if you’re not outside,” he said. 
Davé is also a big believer in air filtration indoors. 
He recommended having a HEPA filter, which will take care of any small particles in your home, from pollen and dust to pet dander and mold spores. 
When you venture outdoors, Davé recommended wearing a mask  even a plain surgical mask  if you are particularly sensitive to seasonal allergies. 
“It will cut down on the sheer amount of stuff that you are exposed to,” he said. 
Davé also suggested taking a shower after you’ve been outside. 
Above all, though, Davé doesn’t want allergy season to stop Pacific Northwesterners from getting outside. 
Allergies are as inevitable for some as the trees blooming, but these steps  and medication in some cases  can help. 
“I don’t want people to feel like they need to avoid the outdoors,” he said. 
“We’re surrounded by so much beautiful nature  the mountains, the river, the Sound  so I want folks to be out there.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.4%Vaughan Jones: 2.6%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias7.4%This article: 3.2%Vaughan Jones: 0.5%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias3.2%This article: 5.1%Vaughan Jones: 6.4%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic5.1%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 1.5%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.1%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%Vaughan Jones: 2.5%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias12.4%This article: 11.9%Vaughan Jones: 9.6%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect11.9%This article: 3.0%Vaughan Jones: 2.4%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion3.0%This article: 4.1%Vaughan Jones: 1.5%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias4.1%This article: 1.5%Vaughan Jones: 0.3%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect1.5%This article: 2.3%Vaughan Jones: 7.0%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias2.3%This article: 7.1%Vaughan Jones: 3.9%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias7.1%This article: 15.1%Vaughan Jones: 7.5%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias15.1%This article: 2.3%Vaughan Jones: 1.1%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.1%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 3.1%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.8%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Vaughan Jones: 7.4%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect5.0%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.2%Vaughan Jones: 1.7%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias3.2%This article: 4.8%Vaughan Jones: 0.6%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect4.8%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.0%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 4.8%Vaughan Jones: 0.3%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man4.8%This article: 19.2%Vaughan Jones: 10.8%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority19.2%This article: 2.6%Vaughan Jones: 1.1%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma2.6%This article: 5.6%Vaughan Jones: 1.0%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope5.6%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.5%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.5%Vaughan Jones: 7.7%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization4.5%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.1%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 2.2%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.0%Vaughan Jones: 3.8%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion8.0%This article: 1.1%Vaughan Jones: 0.5%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question1.1%This article: 3.6%Vaughan Jones: 1.8%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.6%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.1%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 3.3%Vaughan Jones: 0.3%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature3.3%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 19.5%Vaughan Jones: 5.8%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal19.5%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.2%Vaughan Jones: 1.0%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.2%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.6%Vaughan Jones: 2.8%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote5.6%This article: 1.1%Vaughan Jones: 0.1%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection1.1%This article: 5.6%Vaughan Jones: 3.2%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice5.6%This article: 4.5%Vaughan Jones: 0.4%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination4.5%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.0%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Vaughan Jones: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Vaughan Jones: 3.0%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.1%

663 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers59%attributed speech274writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageClimate Central • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageRahool Davé • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRahool Davé • 15 words • 100.0% coverageRahool Davé • 21 words • 0.0% coverageRahool Davé • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRahool Davé • 22 words • 100.0% coverageRahool Davé • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageClimate Central • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageRahool Davé • 7 words • 100.0% coverageRahool Davé • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRahool Davé • 13 words • 0.0% coverageRahool Davé • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageRahool Davé • 21 words • 0.0% coverageRahool Davé • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRahool Davé • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRahool Davé • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageRahool Davé • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRahool Davé • 27 words • 100.0% coverageRahool Davé • 24 words • 0.0% coverageRahool Davé • 17 words • 0.0% coverageRahool Davé • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRahool Davé • 15 words • 100.0% coverageRahool Davé • 23 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Rahool Davé

95%flagged-word coverage
355 attributed words91% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-13.5 ptsWriter: 13.5%Rahool Davé: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+10.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Rahool Davé: 10.4%10.4%Attempt to Sell a Product +7.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Rahool Davé: 7.6%7.6%Indoctrination-1.2 ptsWriter: 5.5%Rahool Davé: 4.2%4.2%Quote-first Misdirection+2.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Rahool Davé: 2.0%2.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.