KUOW73%

Washington DNR asks for grace this camping season amid budget cuts 13%

By Sami West0%

5/18/2026, 2:00:26 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 453 faulty-reasoning hits from 783 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.4% and a BS Rank of 13% (19,181 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.60% of the article peer group.

Summer is almost here  and for nature lovers, that also means camping season is right around the corner. 
But that might look a little different this year, as Washington’s Department of Natural Resources grapples with a state budget crunch and heavy winter flooding. 
The budget for the DNR’s recreation program was cut by over 20% in 2025  and this year, another $580,000 of maintenance funding was eliminated. 
All told, the program has seen $8 million of cuts in less than two years. 
In April, the DNR announced that four campgrounds would fully close for the season, and a handful of others will see reduced seasons this year. 
One of the casualties is 29 Pines Campground in the Teanaway Community Forest. 
It’s a popular free camping destination in southeastern Washington. 
Located at the north fork of the Teanaway River, anyone who camps there in the summer gets a chance to cool off in the water. 
Larry Leach, who oversees the DNR’s southeast region, says much of the campground’s infrastructure dates back to the 1960s and 70s, and people have been enjoying this unique space for decades. 
“We have many families that tell us they have a certain weekend of the summer where they come there every year,” Leach told KUOW’s "Seattle Now." 
But some of those families may miss out this year: The campground won’t be open until July, after winter storms knocked down trees. 
That led to some new log jams, which created a new river channel that Leach says “kind of blasted through” 29 Pines. 
Normally, DNR has more crews that can help clean up damaged campgrounds  but not this year. 
“That camping area rarely misses our opening in April,” Leach explained. 
“But with the reductions in our budget statewide and not being able to bring in the Washington Conservation Corps crews, that really stretched our DNR staff pretty thin to get things ready.” 
The Washington Conservation Corps is a statewide service program for young adults ages 18 to 25, who work in support of DNR to get campgrounds and trails ready for the busy summer season. 
Leach says losing the support of the Conservation Corps is a “big hit.” 
“Having those crews is an amplifier for our staff,” he said. 
“And looking forward, the projections are that some of the funding we get from the gas tax may be going down, so we’re bracing ourselves for the future.” 
In the meantime, Leach says he and his staff are working hard to rally before camping season gets into full swing. 
But that’s a tall order for his crew of just seven field workers in southeastern Washington. 
“We’ve just coached everyone to really pace ourselves and prioritize the recreation opportunities that give the most opportunity to the most people,” Leach said. 
They’re prioritizing the most popular sites, Leach said, along with spaces that have the most recreation uses. 
Despite the hard work of his small but mighty crew, Leach acknowledged campers and hikers may notice some differences this season, like less trail maintenance and smellier bathrooms. 
Leach’s top message: “Just be nice. 
People are just doing their job.” 
“I am asking that people are patient if we do fall behind on some cleaning or vandalism repair, and to really have a lot of grace with my staff,” he said. 
“I remember during Covid, when everyone was frustrated with everything, people were taking it out on staff, and it’s not their fault,” Leach continued. 
“They’re doing the best they can. 
We all wish we had more money and more staff to make things nicer for everyone.” 
And take it from Leach: DNR staffers may be more frustrated about these cuts than anyone else. 
“My staff, they take a lot of pride in having things very tidy,” he said. 
“Not being able to fix every little thing in these camping areas or at trailheads, some of them  they’re hurting with that.” 
In addition to giving the DNR some grace, Leach asked all campers and hikers to help out by picking up after themselves and thinking about how they can leave a campsite or trail better for the next person who comes through. 
And, Leach said, try to stay positive. 
At least in southeastern Washington, the cuts this year haven’t caused a massive impact, yet. 
Though losing the Conservation Corps is huge, the region’s staffing hasn’t taken a hit this year because of a funding provision meant to allow public access roads to be restored. 
“That really offset the impact right now,” Leach said. 
“But that’s a one-time, one-year thing, so a year from now is what we’re really bracing for.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Sami West: 1.2%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Sami West: 0.8%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias5.1%This article: 3.1%Sami West: 3.9%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic3.1%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 1.2%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 1.1%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 1.2%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 18.4%Sami West: 6.6%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect18.4%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.5%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.7%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.8%Sami West: 3.0%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias2.8%This article: 5.7%Sami West: 1.9%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 7.1%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 2.5%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.7%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.8%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.2%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 2.6%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 1.3%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.2%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.4%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.2%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.2%Sami West: 2.9%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority2.2%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 1.8%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.3%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 3.7%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.4%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.8%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.9%Sami West: 7.4%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion8.9%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 1.0%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 2.0%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.3%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.4%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.3%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.4%Sami West: 3.3%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal6.4%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 1.4%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.5%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.7%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 2.0%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 5.2%Sami West: 2.5%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination5.2%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.5%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sami West: 0.5%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

783 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker46%attributed speech425writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 31 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 13 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 6 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 6 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 31 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 24 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 6 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageLarry Leach • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 9 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Leach • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Larry Leach

57%flagged-word coverage
358 attributed words100% of attributed speech53% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Indoctrination-9.6 ptsWriter: 9.6%Larry Leach: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.