In trial over Seattle's Denny Blaine Park, video evidence shows public sex acts 37%

By Amy Radil0%

5/28/2026, 11:41:30 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 839 faulty-reasoning hits from 515 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.3% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,967 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the article peer group.

In a King County courtroom on Thursday, a judge reviewed videos of people performing oral sex and masturbating in Seattle’s Denny Blaine Park. 
The trial is part of a lawsuit by neighbors seeking to have the park declared a public nuisance and potentially closed. 
The videos were recorded from the property of the park’s next-door neighbor, philanthropist Stuart Sloan, who has urged city officials to clamp down on lewd behavior and in 2023 offered to anonymously help fund a new playground in the park. 
That proposal drew an outcry from patrons and the public who said it would disrupt Denny Blaine’s tradition of serving as a gathering place for nudists and LGBTQ people. 
The neighbors’ group Denny Blaine Park for All sued the city in 2025. 
Since then, Judge Samuel Chung has overseen the city’s abatement plan which includes new fencing around “clothing optional” areas, signage and increased presence from police and park rangers. 
But Sloan’s house manager Carrie Christensen said on the witness stand this week that the city’s response has done little to curb indecent exposure. 
She said she knows of three people arrested out of hundreds of instances of sexual conduct. 
“The lewd acts and illegal behavior I’ve witnessed on an almost daily basis is inexcusable,” Christensen said. 
She said she is not opposed to public nudity, which is legal in the city of Seattle, but at Denny Blaine the nudity “invites a darker element.” 
Neighbors have also protested drug use and illegal parking which they said blocks vehicle access to and from their homes. 
Defenders of the park as a nude and queer-friendly gathering place said the examples in court were overblown. 
Nicole Baich is a member of the group Friends of Denny Blaine, an intervenor in the lawsuit seeking to preserve the park’s identity. 
“What we’re seeing in court is very atypical, and ultimately it’s unfair that an entire historic community and culture is collectively being punished for some bad apples,” she said. 
Baich said she visits the park regularly and members of her group are working to educate people that the park is a place for “nonsexual nudity” only. 
But she said publicity from the lawsuit and controversy in recent years has resulted in more visitors to what was once a little-known green space. 
During Thursday’s court proceedings, an evidentiary photo of Baich herself was shown standing naked at a gap in the city’s new fencing. 
Baich said she was protesting the city's changes. 
“On that day with the fence going up, two-thirds of the park were removed from the general typical use,” she said. 
“It was an act of protest to signal displeasure with the decision to control peoples’ self-expression.” 
Baich added that “no other park is surveilled like Denny Blaine.” 
She said she’s hoping the trial leads to solutions such as staffing and outreach that can decrease or eliminate lewd conduct and cool the tensions between park patrons and the neighborhood. 
The trial began on Wednesday and is expected to last about a month. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.0%Amy Radil: 5.2%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias13.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 1.9%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Amy Radil: 3.5%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic9.3%This article: 5.2%Amy Radil: 1.2%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic5.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 1.2%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Amy Radil: 1.4%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias2.1%This article: 11.3%Amy Radil: 9.4%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect11.3%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 1.7%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.4%Amy Radil: 1.9%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.4%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.0%Amy Radil: 4.8%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 2.0%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 20.6%Amy Radil: 12.9%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias20.6%This article: 5.2%Amy Radil: 5.7%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 2.1%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 1.2%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 16.9%Amy Radil: 2.7%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias16.9%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.8%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 1.7%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.3%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 1.3%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.3%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 1.0%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.4%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 5.0%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 1.7%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.9%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.1%Amy Radil: 3.5%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization11.1%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.6%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 1.0%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.1%Amy Radil: 7.1%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion3.1%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 1.2%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.9%Amy Radil: 2.7%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.9%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.6%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.6%Amy Radil: 0.5%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division5.6%This article: 14.2%Amy Radil: 4.2%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal14.2%This article: 5.6%Amy Radil: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman5.6%This article: 5.2%Amy Radil: 1.2%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.3%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.5%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.3%Amy Radil: 1.1%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote9.3%This article: 4.3%Amy Radil: 0.8%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection4.3%This article: 4.5%Amy Radil: 2.4%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice4.5%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.4%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.3%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.3%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Radil: 0.2%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

515 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers64%attributed speech187writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageStuart Sloan • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageDenny Blaine Park for All • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageCarrie Christensen • 24 words • 0.0% coverageCarrie Christensen • 16 words • 100.0% coverageCarrie Christensen • 17 words • 0.0% coverageCarrie Christensen • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageNicole Baich • 23 words • 0.0% coverageNicole Baich • 29 words • 0.0% coverageNicole Baich • 27 words • 0.0% coverageNicole Baich • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageNicole Baich • 8 words • 0.0% coverageNicole Baich • 21 words • 100.0% coverageNicole Baich • 16 words • 0.0% coverageNicole Baich • 11 words • 100.0% coverageNicole Baich • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Carrie Christensen

100%flagged-word coverage
84 attributed words26% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote+19.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Carrie Christensen: 19.0%19.0%Biased Writer Voice-12.3 ptsWriter: 12.3%Carrie Christensen: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-11.8 ptsWriter: 11.8%Carrie Christensen: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.