Man from India who just wanted to go home sent to Alaska by ICE 73%

By Kim Malcolm39% John O'Brien36%

4/27/2026, 5:27:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 797 faulty-reasoning hits from 620 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 65.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (5,971 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the article peer group.

After spending months detained at the Northwest ICE Processing Center in Tacoma, Rakesh Rakesh decided to voluntarily self-deport to India, where he was born and raised. 
But instead of putting him on an Alaska Airlines flight to New York, where he would transfer to a flight to India, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents sent Rakesh to Sitka, Alaska. 
KUOW's Kim Malcolm talked with Seattle Times immigration reporter Nina Shapiro about Rakesh's dilemma and how an Alaska Airlines pilot lent him a hand. 
This interview has been edited for clarity. 
Kim Malcolm: Flight attendants told the ICE agents about their mistake, but they reportedly insisted Rakesh remain on the flight. 
Nina Shapiro: On the plane, they're trying to figure out, what do we do now? 
The captain talks to Rakesh and explains what happened. 
Then, when they're in Alaska, the captain takes an interest in this gentleman, and actually books him a hotel room right next to his own. 
Alaska Airlines gets involved. 
They pay for his meals. 
They rebook him back to Seattle at no charge, and then on to the itinerary he was supposed to be on, to New York and then on to India. 
But when he gets back to Seattle, ICE agents won't let him do that. 
That is a part of the story that's so curious to me. 
Mr. 
Rakesh was taken back to the Tacoma detention facility. 
How did he respond? 
Not well. 
He is freaking out at this point. 
He has been in the detention center for months. 
It's a very difficult place to be. 
It's essentially like a jail. 
There have been a lot of complaints about conditions. 
Finally, he is like, “I just want to get out of here.” 
Then, it turns out he's being sent to the most remote part of the U.S. 
Then he finally gets back, and he is like, “OK, now I'm going to go home.” 
But in fact, he's going back to the same place. 
And he actually goes on hunger strike in an attempt to call attention to his plight. 
You talked about the story with an immigration lawyer who met the Alaska Airlines captain who was at the Tacoma Detention Center to visit Mr. 
Rakesh, after ICE took Rakesh back into custody. 
What were some of his takeaways about the story? 
The lawyer's first reaction upon hearing the story was, “This is crazy.” 
First, this whole flight SNAFU, but then the fact that he is re-detained, as the lawyer put it, at no fault of his own. 
He was trying to leave but instead winds up back in the detention center. 
He hadn't heard of something like this, but he did see it as emblematic of what he called “inefficiencies” that ICE sometimes displays. 
He mentioned that there is this rhetoric since the president took office and has made it a point to say he wanted to detain as many people living illegally in the U.S. as possible and is going to ramp up deportations. 
And yet, the lawyer said you have people in the detention center who really want to get out of here, who are ready to go back to their country, and for one reason or the other, they can't leave. 
They're kind of stuck in the detention center. 
And Mr. 
Rakesh, where is he now? 
He did finally make it back to India. 
In the end, he spent about 16 more days in the detention center. 
ICE did finally arrange for his flight back home. 
I interviewed him several times and he's back on his family's farm. 
Listen to the interview by clicking the play button above. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.0%Kim Malcolm: 2.4%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias9.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.8%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Kim Malcolm: 3.3%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic9.5%This article: 3.7%Kim Malcolm: 1.2%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic3.7%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.8%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.4%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Kim Malcolm: 4.4%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect2.3%This article: 2.6%Kim Malcolm: 0.5%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion2.6%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.8%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.9%Kim Malcolm: 5.2%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.3%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.3%Kim Malcolm: 5.4%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias11.3%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.7%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Kim Malcolm: 1.2%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error6.3%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.7%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.4%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Kim Malcolm: 3.5%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect7.9%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%Kim Malcolm: 1.1%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias1.9%This article: 1.9%Kim Malcolm: 0.4%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 2.3%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.2%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.5%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.0%Kim Malcolm: 4.1%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization10.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.6%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.9%Kim Malcolm: 3.7%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion6.9%This article: 3.9%Kim Malcolm: 0.9%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question3.9%This article: 11.5%Kim Malcolm: 2.3%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.5%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.5%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.4%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.3%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.5%Kim Malcolm: 4.2%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal10.5%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.5%Kim Malcolm: 2.4%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.5%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.6%Kim Malcolm: 1.2%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote6.6%This article: 1.9%Kim Malcolm: 0.3%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection1.9%This article: 4.2%Kim Malcolm: 3.9%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice4.2%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.4%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 6.6%Kim Malcolm: 0.7%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Kim Malcolm: 1.4%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.6%

620 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers13%attributed speech538writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageKim Malcolm • 20 words • 100.0% coverageNina Shapiro • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAlaska Airlines • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAlaska Airlines • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAlaska Airlines • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageImmigration and Customs Enforcement • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kim Malcolm

100%flagged-word coverage
20 attributed words24% of attributed speech80% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+96.1 ptsWriter: 3.9%Kim Malcolm: 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B-7.6 ptsWriter: 7.6%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.8 ptsWriter: 4.8%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.2 ptsWriter: 2.2%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.9 ptsWriter: 1.9%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.