Daily Kos84%

Another perspective 87%

By David Horsey91%

7/5/2026, 12:30:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Loss Aversion, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 318 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 78.6% and a BS Rank of 87% (3,049 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 86.10% of the article peer group.

A cartoon by David Horsey. 
Related | JD Vance gets thankless job of spinning crappy Iran ‘deal’ 
We'll get straight to the point: The financial hardships that Daily Kos is facing this year are tough. 
We continue to be paywall-free. 
We continue to be supported by our readers, not billionaires or corporations. 
But we need to bring in more revenue. 
We are leaning on our community more than ever to help make ends meet. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 5.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 3.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 18.4%David Horsey: 18.5%Daily Kos: 8.9%Framing Effect18.4%This article: 34.2%David Horsey: 11.8%Daily Kos: 0.6%Loss Aversion34.2%This article: 6.6%David Horsey: 0.5%Daily Kos: 0.3%Status Quo Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 3.0%Daily Kos: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 34.2%David Horsey: 7.5%Daily Kos: 2.0%Pessimism Bias34.2%This article: 15.8%David Horsey: 13.0%Daily Kos: 15.4%Negativity Bias15.8%This article: 22.4%David Horsey: 4.4%Daily Kos: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias22.4%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 2.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 34.2%David Horsey: 14.8%Daily Kos: 2.1%In-Group Bias34.2%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 1.3%Daily Kos: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 2.5%Daily Kos: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 18.4%David Horsey: 1.5%Daily Kos: 1.5%Recency Bias18.4%This article: 2.6%David Horsey: 0.2%Daily Kos: 0.4%Primacy Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 15.8%David Horsey: 2.6%Daily Kos: 5.8%Ad Hominem15.8%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.6%David Horsey: 0.5%Daily Kos: 3.2%Appeal to Authority6.6%This article: 15.8%David Horsey: 7.7%Daily Kos: 2.3%False Dilemma15.8%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 6.4%Daily Kos: 9.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.5%Daily Kos: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 50.0%David Horsey: 32.9%Daily Kos: 7.3%Appeal to Emotion50.0%This article: 23.7%David Horsey: 2.8%Daily Kos: 1.9%Begging the Question23.7%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 1.3%Daily Kos: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.5%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 10.5%David Horsey: 1.7%Daily Kos: 0.8%Burden of Proof10.5%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.9%Daily Kos: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%David Horsey: 1.3%Daily Kos: 2.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 15.8%David Horsey: 1.3%Daily Kos: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection15.8%This article: 2.6%David Horsey: 26.7%Daily Kos: 23.1%Biased Writer Voice2.6%This article: 23.7%David Horsey: 16.1%Daily Kos: 2.1%Indoctrination23.7%This article: 15.8%David Horsey: 14.6%Daily Kos: 10.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias15.8%This article: 15.8%David Horsey: 1.3%Daily Kos: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias15.8%This article: 35.5%David Horsey: 29.8%Daily Kos: 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…35.5%

76 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker6.6%attributed speech71writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageDavid Horsey • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

David Horsey

100%flagged-word coverage
5 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -38.0 ptsWriter: 38.0%David Horsey: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-25.4 ptsWriter: 25.4%David Horsey: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-16.9 ptsWriter: 16.9%David Horsey: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-16.9 ptsWriter: 16.9%David Horsey: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -16.9 ptsWriter: 16.9%David Horsey: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%David Horsey: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.