Disrespect Directed At Steph Curry From LeBron Supporters Is Off The Charts 85%

4/18/2026, 8:29:50 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 78.3% saturation with 588 hits. Analysis detected 2,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 751 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 77.8% and a BS Rank of 85% (3,049 of 20,363 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the article peer group.

Over the last decade, Steph Curry has dominated LeBron James in what matters most: Championships. 
While Curry can't lay claim to some of the impressive individual accomplishments of the self-professed "King," I'd argue he's been more of a positive to the game of basketball and been wildly more efficient with much less. 
That's why I find it funny that so many LeBron fan accounts and other supporters seem to pray for the downfall of Curry in the playoffs lately. 
They take cheap shots, which they believe somehow legitimizes James' career. 
I'd say, when your haters have to take so many leaps and bounds to try to delegitimize your Hall of Fame career, in order to elevate their favorite player's career, you've already won. 
Take this stat that has been making the rounds on social media for example: 
Steph Curry has missed the playoffs 40% of his career. 
LeBron James has been in the Finals 43% of his career. 
While this may not have been used to trash Curry's career, it certainly is misleading. 
Put these careers side by side and you'll know that Curry and LeBron both have four NBA Championship rings. 
Curry has done that in 17 seasons with a 4-2 Finals record, while LeBron has done it in 23 seasons and is only 4-6 in The Finals. 
Again, Curry is more efficient. 
Want to celebrate participation trophies, LeBron supporters? 
Go for it. 
Next, let's talk about the Warriors team performance since LeBron James took his talents to the beaches of LA. 
BronMuse on X thought it was a perfect time to dunk on Curry after the Warriors failed to defeat the Phoenix Suns in the play-in game for the 8-seed on Friday night. 
He provided a year-by-year breakdown of the Warriors since 2019 and went as far as trying to diminish the their championship in 2022, which is arguably the most impressive of Curry's career, where Curry won his first Finals MVP, simply referring to it as defeating a "young Celtics team." 
Give me a break. 
Curry and the Warriors went through an absolute gauntlet to beat a stacked Celtics squad in The Finals. 
They defeated Ja Morant and the Grizzlies, Luka Doncic and the Mavs and Nikola Jokic and the Nuggets on the way to The Finals. 
Sure, I know this is the nature of social media, but you have to be pretty insecure when it comes to LeBron and lack understanding that you live in a glass house to share something so preposterous. 
That glass house is obviously the 2020 Championship in the NBA Bubble, which even Anthony Davis doesn't feel good about. 
Davis questions if the ring is completely sufficient and legitmate saying, "Did I really win a championship? 
 I know I'm listed as a champion but it's like, I'm not sure" while appearing on the Draymomd Green Show. 
My response: While Steph Curry may have missed the playoffs four times in the last 8 years, LeBron James is most likely about to get bounced in the first round of the playoffs for the fourth time in 8 years as his depleted Lakers team takes on Kevin Durant and the Houston Rockets, tipping off Saturday night. 
Also, if you factor in injuries, which is a silly what if game at times, but if not for Klay Thompson suffering a hamstring strain in Game 2 and tearing his ACL in Game 6, Kevin Durant suffering a ruptured Achilles tendon in Game 5 and Kevon Looney playing through a non-displaced first costal cartilage fracture, the Warriors beat Toronto and Curry is in elite company with five rings. 
This post was also purposely misleading, refusing to provide disclaimers. 
For example, Curry got hurt in Game 1 vs Minnesota in 2025, so that second round exit isn't on him. 
Curry also missed 27-straight games this season, while Jimmy Butler and Moses Moody, both starters, got season-ending injuries. 
Call them excuses, but that's the reality. 
LeBron fans and supporters will have to jump through major hoops if his team gets torched in the first round against the Rockets. 
You'll be held to the same standard. 
All in all, Curry and LeBron have both had storied careers. 
They're both all-time greats, but some of these petty posts are silly. 
Enjoy what you have now, because in a few seasons, you'll miss seeing Curry flurries from 3 and a player who has been loyal to one team his whole career. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.5%Outkick: 8.8%Confirmation Bias6.5%This article: 3.6%Outkick: 1.9%Anchoring Bias3.6%This article: 7.3%Outkick: 5.3%Availability Heuristic7.3%This article: 4.0%Outkick: 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.0%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 1.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.7%Outkick: 6.1%Overconfidence Bias0.7%This article: 4.5%Outkick: 12.5%Framing Effect4.5%This article: 4.0%Outkick: 1.0%Loss Aversion4.0%This article: 1.5%Outkick: 1.3%Status Quo Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.2%Outkick: 4.4%Optimism Bias9.2%This article: 14.6%Outkick: 2.5%Pessimism Bias14.6%This article: 14.1%Outkick: 12.8%Negativity Bias14.1%This article: 18.5%Outkick: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias18.5%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 3.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 2.7%Outkick: 0.6%Actor-Observer Bias2.7%This article: 9.5%Outkick: 5.1%In-Group Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 2.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Outkick: 5.2%Halo Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 1.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.1%Outkick: 3.4%Recency Bias10.1%This article: 8.1%Outkick: 0.5%Primacy Effect8.1%This article: 4.4%Outkick: 0.4%Blind-Spot Bias4.4%This article: 15.6%Outkick: 4.0%Ad Hominem15.6%This article: 6.5%Outkick: 2.0%Straw Man6.5%This article: 7.7%Outkick: 3.6%Appeal to Authority7.7%This article: 2.9%Outkick: 2.3%False Dilemma2.9%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.7%Outkick: 11.5%Hasty Generalization19.7%This article: 2.4%Outkick: 1.2%Red Herring2.4%This article: 3.1%Outkick: 2.4%Bandwagon3.1%This article: 17.3%Outkick: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion17.3%This article: 6.4%Outkick: 1.7%Begging the Question6.4%This article: 11.7%Outkick: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.7%This article: 0.9%Outkick: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.9%This article: 5.7%Outkick: 0.5%Burden of Proof5.7%This article: 4.0%Outkick: 0.3%Appeal to Nature4.0%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.7%Outkick: 4.3%Anecdotal6.7%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 0.4%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 15.0%Outkick: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.0%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 0.7%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 11.9%Outkick: 1.0%Special Pleading11.9%This article: 2.5%Outkick: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy2.5%This article: 14.0%Outkick: 2.1%Unattributed Quote14.0%This article: 6.5%Outkick: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection6.5%This article: 78.3%Outkick: 18.0%Biased Writer Voice78.3%This article: 4.9%Outkick: 2.4%Indoctrination4.9%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 2.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Outkick: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

751 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers16%attributed speech632writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageBronMuse • 32 words • 100.0% coverageBronMuse • 49 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageAnthony Davis • 17 words • 100.0% coverageAnthony Davis • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 57 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 69 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

BronMuse

100%flagged-word coverage
81 attributed words68% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Biased Writer Voice-21.5 ptsWriter: 82.0%BronMuse: 60.5%60.5%Quote-first Misdirection+39.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%BronMuse: 39.5%39.5%Unattributed Quote-13.9 ptsWriter: 13.9%BronMuse: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.9 ptsWriter: 5.9%BronMuse: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.