China proposes laser-powered energy tower near moon’s south pole to transmit wireless power 60%

By Bojan Stojkovski88%

7/12/2026, 1:07:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 158 hits. Analysis detected 1,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 600 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 56.1% and a BS Rank of 60% (8,805 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the article peer group.

Researchers in China are proposing that the moon could become the first place where wireless power transmission is used in a practical setting. 
The concept centers on the lunar south pole, a region where elevated crater rims receive almost continuous sunlight while nearby permanently shadowed craters remain in darkness and are believed to contain significant deposits of water ice. 
Rather than depending on long power cables or carrying heavy battery systems, lunar rovers operating inside these dark craters would receive energy via laser beams transmitted from solar-powered stations installed on the sunlit peaks above. 
According to scientists from the Harbin Institute of Technology, the approach could provide a more efficient way to power exploration missions in some of the moon’s most challenging and scientifically valuable environments. 
New research details how a lunar laser power grid could work 
In a peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of Deep Space Exploration , the researchers presented an optimized deployment strategy for a laser-based power transmission network designed for the lunar surface. 
The study was led by scientists from the Harbin Institute of Technology, who are also affiliated with the National Key Laboratory of Laser Spatial Information and the National Key Laboratory of Aerospace Mechanism. 
Both institutions play a strategic role in advancing China’s aerospace research, with expertise spanning laser technologies, space systems, and next-gen engineering for future lunar exploration missions, the South China Morning Post writes . 
The researchers said their findings could help lay the groundwork for future lunar research stations and their supporting energy infrastructure. 
According to the study, repositioning laser transmission stations by about 330 feet increased the network’s effective coverage by more than 35%, while making the powered areas almost fully connected. 
The proposal comes as China and the US intensify their efforts to establish a sustained human and scientific presence on the moon, with the lunar south pole becoming the primary destination for both NASA’s Artemis program and China’s Chang’e missions. 
The region is considered especially attractive because its elevated ridges receive prolonged periods of sunlight, while its permanently shadowed craters are believed to contain water ice, making it a key location for scientific research, in-situ resource utilization, and the development of future lunar bases. 
Powering rovers where sunlight cannot reach 
Powering equipment in the moon’s permanently shadowed regions remains a major challenge for future missions, as rovers operating in these craters cannot rely on solar panels, while batteries may not provide enough endurance for extended exploration. 
The proposed system would use solar arrays on sunlit ridges to generate laser beams , transmitting energy to rover-mounted receivers that convert the light back into electricity. 
The proposed system would rely on multiple interconnected stations, creating a network that allows rovers to move between powered areas without needing large onboard batteries. 
Instead of choosing locations only based on sunlight availability, the Harbin researchers used statistical modelling to identify the best deployment points for maximizing energy coverage and maintaining strong network connectivity. 
The Chinese researchers said their optimisation approach created a continuous and stable laser power supply network. 
To test the concept, the team used NASA’s Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter data from the area around Shackleton crater, one of the most important locations for future lunar missions. 
The model increased effective energy coverage from nearly 18% to more than 24%, while improving regional connectivity from below 40% to almost 100%. 
Simulations showed that over a distance of about 3 miles, the system could still provide enough power to support rover operations in permanently shadowed areas of the moon. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 3.1%Interesting Engineering: 3.9%Confirmation Bias11.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.7%Interesting Engineering: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 2.0%Interesting Engineering: 2.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 11.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.9%Interesting Engineering: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic11.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 16.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 8.8%Interesting Engineering: 5.2%Overconfidence Bias16.0%This article: 17.2%Bojan Stojkovski: 7.2%Interesting Engineering: 6.4%Framing Effect17.2%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.3%Interesting Engineering: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.3%Interesting Engineering: 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 25.3%Bojan Stojkovski: 22.1%Interesting Engineering: 16.9%Optimism Bias25.3%This article: 6.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.5%Interesting Engineering: 0.6%Pessimism Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.9%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 5.5%Interesting Engineering: 4.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.6%Interesting Engineering: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Bojan Stojkovski: 10.7%Interesting Engineering: 5.2%Halo Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.3%Interesting Engineering: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 26.3%Bojan Stojkovski: 13.2%Interesting Engineering: 8.6%Appeal to Authority26.3%This article: 11.8%Bojan Stojkovski: 1.0%Interesting Engineering: 1.5%False Dilemma11.8%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.5%Interesting Engineering: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.8%Bojan Stojkovski: 4.4%Interesting Engineering: 5.1%Hasty Generalization3.8%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.5%Interesting Engineering: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.7%Bojan Stojkovski: 1.4%Interesting Engineering: 0.8%Bandwagon6.7%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 1.0%Interesting Engineering: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 5.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 1.9%Interesting Engineering: 1.2%Begging the Question5.0%This article: 6.7%Bojan Stojkovski: 1.9%Interesting Engineering: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.7%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 7.3%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.6%Interesting Engineering: 0.3%Composition/Division7.3%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.8%Bojan Stojkovski: 2.0%Interesting Engineering: 2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.8%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.2%Interesting Engineering: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.5%Bojan Stojkovski: 1.7%Interesting Engineering: 1.7%Unattributed Quote11.5%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.2%Bojan Stojkovski: 4.7%Interesting Engineering: 3.9%Biased Writer Voice5.2%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 1.1%Interesting Engineering: 0.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.3%Interesting Engineering: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Bojan Stojkovski: 19.5%Interesting Engineering: 10.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.7%

600 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers21%attributed speech472writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageHarbin Institute of Technology • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageHarbin Institute of Technology • 33 words • 0.0% coverageSouth China Morning Post • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageHarbin Institute of Technology • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words26% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+92.4 ptsWriter: 7.6%South China Morning Post: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.6 ptsWriter: 6.6%South China Morning Post: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.9 ptsWriter: 5.9%South China Morning Post: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.