Wally Funk 1%

By Robert Pearlman5%

7/10/2026, 11:30:29 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 196 hits. Analysis detected 833 faulty-reasoning hits from 889 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 1% (21,022 of 21,198 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the article peer group.

Wally Funk, who in 2021 became the oldest woman to fly into space—60 years after she and 12 other women sought the same opportunity as NASA’s original astronauts—died on Wednesday at 87 years old. 
Funk was the last living member of the First Lady Astronaut Trainees (FLATs, or as they were later dubbed by the media, the Mercury 13), a group of women pilots who volunteered to go through the same physical and psychological tests as the United States’ first spacemen. 
Despite performing as well or better than their male counterparts, though, the Lovelace Woman in Space Program was conducted separately from NASA, and the space agency required that its astronauts be test pilots with jet time. 
The US military, however, did not accept women into its flight programs. 
Still, Funk never gave up the dream, and when she was invited by Blue Origin to join Jeff Bezos on the company’s first human suborbital spaceflight, she boarded the New Shepard capsule on July 20, 2021, and logged a 10-minute flight at the age of 82. 
“The Grapevine community joins family, friends and admirers around the world in mourning the passing of aviation pioneer Wally Funk, 87, who passed away peacefully last night at home, surrounded by those she loved,” read a release from her Texas hometown. 
“The City of Grapevine proudly recognizes Wally Funk, whose extraordinary career has inspired generations by breaking barriers in aviation and space exploration.” 
Funk’s NS-16 flight earned her the Federal Aviation Administration’s 13th pair of Commercial Space Astronaut Wings. 
She was the 26th person in history to fly beyond 50 miles’ (80 km) altitude and the 585th person to enter space, as recorded in the Registry of Space Travelers by the Association of Space Explorers. 
“I felt great! 
I felt like I was just laying down and I was going into space,” said Funk at a post-flight press conference. 
“I have been waiting a long time to finally get up there… I want to go again, fast.” 
Wally Funk, seen at age 21 as a flight instructor, prior to her joining the First Lady Astronaut Trainees or “Mercury 13.” 
Wally Funk/Blue Origin 
Born Mary Wallace Funk on February 1, 1939, in Las Vegas, New Mexico, Funk took up an early interest in aviation. 
She graduated from Stephens College in Missouri with an Associate of Arts degree and her pilot’s license. 
She received a Bachelor of Science degree in Secondary Education from Oklahoma State University, while also racking up certificates and ratings, including her commercial, single-engine land, multi-engine land, single-engine sea, instrument, flight instructor, and all ground instructor ratings. 
Beyond joining the FLATs, Funk became a professional aviator, instructing US Army officers on how to fly. 
She was the first female flight instructor to serve at a US military base. 
In 1971, she achieved the rating of flight inspector from the FAA, becoming the first woman to do so, and three years later, was hired by the National Transportation Safety Board as its first female air safety investigator. 
Funk raced planes and became a renowned pilot trainer and speaker on aviation safety. 
She was chief pilot for five aviation schools across the country, qualifying thousands of students on multiple airflight ratings. 
Wally Funk, second from left, along with fellow members of the “Mercury 13,” pose for a photo in front of space shuttle Discovery ahead of the launch of NASA’s first woman pilot in 1995. 
As a member of the Mercury 13, Funk attended the launch of the first woman to pilot a space shuttle into space, Eileen Collins, in 1995, and in 2020, published a memoir, Higher, Faster, Longer: My Life in Aviation and My Quest for Space Flight with co-author Loretta Hall. 
For her contributions to aviation and spaceflight history, Funk was inducted into the Texas Aviation Hall of Fame in 2024 and will be posthumously inducted into the International Space Hall of Fame at the New Mexico Museum of Space History later this year. 
She received a Guinness World Record as the oldest woman in space and, in 2022, was awarded the National Air and Space Museum’s Michael Collins Trophy for Lifetime Achievement. 
Funk was unmarried and did not have children. 
She was preceded in death by her fellow Mercury 13 members Myrtle Cagle, Jerrie Cobb, Janet Dietrich, Marion Dietrich, Sarah Gorelick (later Ratley), Jane “Janey” Briggs Hart, Jean Hixson, Rhea Woltman, Gene Nora Stumbough (later Jessen), Irene Leverton, Jerri Sloan (later Truhill), and Bernice Steadman. 
She also outlived the Mercury 7 astronauts. 
Robert Pearlman is a space historian, journalist and the founder and editor of collectSPACE, a daily news publication and online community focused on where space exploration intersects with pop culture. 
He is also a contributing writer for Space.com and co-author of "Space Stations: The Art, Science, and Reality of Working in Space” published by Smithsonian Books in 2018. 
He is on the leadership board for For All Moonkind and is a member of the American Astronautical Society's history committee. 
Suspecting AI cheating, Ivy League prof ordered an in-person final; scores fell 50% 
US seeks cheaper hunter-killer drones after Iran destroys $1B worth of Reapers 
Payloads used to dictate the terms of launch. 
That's finally changing. 
Allstate accuses Broadcom of auditing it because it quit VMware, CA 
Surprised doctors find 10-inch worm in man's groin during elective surgery 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.5%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 2.8%Confirmation Bias5.5%This article: 4.0%Robert Pearlman: 2.5%Ars Technica: 1.2%Anchoring Bias4.0%This article: 3.4%Robert Pearlman: 1.6%Ars Technica: 2.4%Availability Heuristic3.4%This article: 4.3%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 2.6%Ars Technica: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.7%Ars Technica: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 1.5%Ars Technica: 3.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.3%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.5%Robert Pearlman: 1.4%Ars Technica: 4.2%Optimism Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Robert Pearlman: 0.7%Ars Technica: 6.2%Negativity Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.5%Ars Technica: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Robert Pearlman: 5.7%Ars Technica: 2.0%Halo Effect9.3%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.8%Robert Pearlman: 0.3%Ars Technica: 1.0%Recency Bias0.8%This article: 1.6%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.3%Primacy Effect1.6%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 22.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.6%Ars Technica: 4.1%Appeal to Authority22.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.3%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.3%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.3%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 2.7%Appeal to Emotion10.3%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.8%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.8%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.3%Ars Technica: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.9%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 1.5%Anecdotal3.9%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.2%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.2%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.6%Robert Pearlman: 1.1%Ars Technica: 1.5%Unattributed Quote4.6%This article: 0.3%Robert Pearlman: 0.3%Ars Technica: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.3%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 4.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Pearlman: 0.3%Ars Technica: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

889 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers12%attributed speech784writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageGrapevine community • 41 words • 100.0% coverageCity of Grapevine • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageFunk • 3 words • 100.0% coverageFunk • 21 words • 0.0% coverageFunk • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Grapevine community

100%flagged-word coverage
41 attributed words39% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Grapevine community: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.