I told my son to stop playing basketball video games. That idea became a $20 million business. 14%

By Kelly Burch11%

7/9/2026, 5:28:01 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 1,109 faulty-reasoning hits from 761 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (18,889 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the article peer group.

Craig Moody got inspired by his son to create Shoot 360. 
Courtesy of Craig Moody 
Craig Moody developed Shoot 360 after seeing his son choose video games over basketball. 
For six years, Moody ran a construction company while also developing Shoot 360. 
With outside investors, Moody says the business is too big to manage with family alone. 
This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Craig Moody , founder and president of Shoot 360 . 
It has been edited for length and clarity . 
About 15 years ago, my son was sitting in the house, playing basketball video games . 
I said to him, "Why don't you go out and play?" 
I had grown up shooting hoops and coaching, and couldn't imagine that he'd rather play basketball on a screen. 
I walked out of our game room thinking, "If I could make a gym like a video game , I could have it made." 
The idea stuck with me. 
I did more research, and one morning I woke up and said to my wife, "I think I've got it." 
I rented a warehouse and started building Shoot360 that night. 
My dad was an entrepreneur, and I learned from him 
I wasn't a stranger to entrepreneurship. 
My father was a contractor who ran multiple businesses . 
He had an equipment rental yard that he grew into a regional chain, and later sold to a national chain. 
I'd followed in his footsteps and was operating a construction company. 
When you work for yourself, there's no limit to what you can do. 
People would say that's the American dream  and I've always loved the freedom of that. 
Whether it's construction or gaming, the ability to be out on my own and build something I think is special is really appealing to me. 
I ran both companies for 6 years 
I launched Shoot 360 in 2012. 
In the first few years, the growth was slow. 
I was developing a way to bring together physical hoops and balls with digital tracking and gamification in a way that appeals to younger generations. 
I hired people to help with that, while pouring any profits back into the company. 
I kept my construction company operating in order to pay the bills. 
Doing both was time-consuming: I was logging 16-hour days, seven days a week. 
By 2018, Shoot 360 was beginning to really take off. 
I closed down my construction company rather than selling it because I didn't have time to manage the transition. 
Shoot 360 was expanding too quickly. 
My kids understand the business better than me in some ways 
All three of my kids love basketball , and they've been involved with the business from the beginning. 
I was working long days, but the kids were in the gym with me, testing the product. 
They were curious about the business, and it was woven into the fabric of our lives. 
Shoot 360 did about $20 million in revenue in 2025. 
Courtesy of Craig Moody 
When they went to college and started studying business, they realized what an opportunity we had. 
They have a healthy respect for what I've done, but argue that they understand the business even better than I do. 
In a way, they're right. 
Shoot 360 is a technology built around video game culture. 
My kids understand what motivates people in the gaming world, and it's been an advantage to get their input. 
I don't plan to leave the business to my kids 
Today, all three of my children  who are now 31, 29, and 23  work in the business. 
When I started working for my father, I began from the ground up. 
I was pressure washing equipment and managing the rental counter before I helped run things. 
I'm taking the same approach with my children. 
I've started them at the bottom, and they've worked their way up. 
Being in different roles lets them find their area of genius. 
Although we all work together, Shoot 360 isn't a business that will be passed on to the next generation. 
Once you bring in outside investors, you're giving up some of that traditional family business structure. 
Last year, Shoot 360 did about $20 million in revenue. 
In order for this business to continue to grow and to have the greatest impact on the basketball community, it's going to be outside the realm of a family business. 
Really, it already is. 
Read the original article on Business Insider 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.9%Kelly Burch: 1.9%Business Insider: 2.5%Confirmation Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 2.4%Business Insider: 3.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 1.4%Kelly Burch: 2.5%Business Insider: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic1.4%This article: 0.9%Kelly Burch: 1.9%Business Insider: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.9%This article: 9.9%Kelly Burch: 2.5%Business Insider: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 1.5%Business Insider: 5.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Kelly Burch: 0.9%Business Insider: 0.8%Loss Aversion2.5%This article: 5.1%Kelly Burch: 1.1%Business Insider: 0.8%Status Quo Bias5.1%This article: 3.5%Kelly Burch: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect3.5%This article: 9.7%Kelly Burch: 5.2%Business Insider: 3.1%Optimism Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.9%Business Insider: 4.6%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%Kelly Burch: 4.0%Business Insider: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias10.4%This article: 1.3%Kelly Burch: 0.2%Business Insider: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error1.3%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.1%Business Insider: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Kelly Burch: 2.5%Business Insider: 0.8%In-Group Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Kelly Burch: 5.4%Business Insider: 3.0%Halo Effect13.1%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.4%Kelly Burch: 1.1%Business Insider: 1.3%Recency Bias7.4%This article: 2.5%Kelly Burch: 0.4%Business Insider: 0.4%Primacy Effect2.5%This article: 3.2%Kelly Burch: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.9%Kelly Burch: 1.5%Business Insider: 3.3%Appeal to Authority3.9%This article: 8.4%Kelly Burch: 2.0%Business Insider: 1.2%False Dilemma8.4%This article: 2.1%Kelly Burch: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.6%Slippery Slope2.1%This article: 0.5%Kelly Burch: 0.4%Business Insider: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.5%This article: 5.7%Kelly Burch: 2.3%Business Insider: 4.0%Hasty Generalization5.7%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.1%Kelly Burch: 0.6%Business Insider: 0.7%Bandwagon2.1%This article: 7.5%Kelly Burch: 2.7%Business Insider: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion7.5%This article: 6.6%Kelly Burch: 1.0%Business Insider: 0.7%Begging the Question6.6%This article: 5.3%Kelly Burch: 1.4%Business Insider: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.3%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 1.4%Kelly Burch: 0.2%Business Insider: 0.1%Appeal to Nature1.4%This article: 1.1%Kelly Burch: 0.2%Business Insider: 0.2%Composition/Division1.1%This article: 2.1%Kelly Burch: 3.6%Business Insider: 3.6%Anecdotal2.1%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.8%Kelly Burch: 1.3%Business Insider: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.8%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 2.5%Kelly Burch: 0.4%Business Insider: 0.0%Personal Incredulity2.5%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.6%Business Insider: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.2%Kelly Burch: 0.6%Business Insider: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice4.2%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Burch: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Kelly Burch: 0.1%Business Insider: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.9%

761 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker7.0%attributed speech708writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageCraig Moody • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageCraig Moody • 14 words • 0.0% coverageCraig Moody • 13 words • 0.0% coverageCraig Moody • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Craig Moody

75%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words100% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.5 ptsWriter: 4.5%Craig Moody: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.0 ptsWriter: 1.0%Craig Moody: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.