STLPR0%

Aided by a ‘Clown Boss,’ Circus Flora’s 40th season goes back to high school 18%

By Danny Wicentowski0%

6/5/2026, 1:13:27 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Status Quo Bias, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 698 faulty-reasoning hits from 422 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of 18% (17,441 of 21,198 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 82.30% of the article peer group.

Now in its 40th season, Circus Flora is taking its audiences on a journey back to high school with its “Flying High” show. 
The show, which opened Thursday, features a variety of acts across “classrooms” of acrobats, aerialists, clowns and more  including many of the acts that have made the circus a mainstay in St. 
Louis for generations. 
Jack Marsh, executive director of the circus, called the anniversary an incredible milestone. 
“There's been so many wonderful performers, artists, musicians, designers, audiences, all of whom have been touched by Circus Flora in all these ways over the decades,” he said. 
“To be able to look back and see the impact that it's made is really special.” 
Yet, even for a company as old as Circus Flora, there is innovation to be found. 
This year, Marsh was inspired by the growing clown scene in Los Angeles with Chad Damiani. 
“I think when clown gets a bad rap, it's because people consider it anachronistic, right?” 
Damiani said. 
“It's a style that has existed from the 1950s, and there's a certain look. 
Sometimes, holding on to tradition means that we feel like we're displaced from time, so what we ask ourselves is, ‘Can we follow these same principles  principles all the clowns have been using in Circus Flora for 40 years  but think of the audience in this moment?’” 
For the modern clowns learning from Damiani, the challenge, he said, is: “How do we communicate with [audiences] in the world we're living in right now? 
I'd say that's the big difference is we're not held to any tradition  other than that we're there to bring joy to the audience.” 
Related event: 
What: Circus Flora’s “Flying High” 
Where: The Big Top in Grand Center, 3401 Washington Ave., St. 
Louis, MO 63103 
When: June 4-21 
To hear the full conversation with Circus Flora executive director Jack Marsh and clown Chad Damiani, including a dive into the circus’ history  and, at its upcoming show, its first-ever human cannonball performance  listen to “St. 
Louis on the Air” on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or YouTube, or click the play button below. 
“St. 
Louis on the Air” brings you the stories of St. 
Louis and the people who live, work and create in our region. 
The show is produced by Miya Norfleet, Emily Woodbury, Danny Wicentowski, Elaine Cha and Alex Heuer. 
Layla Halilbasic is our production assistant. 
The audio engineer is Aaron Doerr. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.6%Danny Wicentowski: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.7%Danny Wicentowski: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic9.7%This article: 3.3%Danny Wicentowski: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Danny Wicentowski: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias5.9%This article: 3.3%Danny Wicentowski: 5.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 15.4%Danny Wicentowski: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias15.4%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 22.0%Danny Wicentowski: 3.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias22.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Danny Wicentowski: 4.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Danny Wicentowski: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 13.5%Danny Wicentowski: 3.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect13.5%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias10.0%This article: 7.8%Danny Wicentowski: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect7.8%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 5.9%Danny Wicentowski: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma5.9%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.6%Danny Wicentowski: 3.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization6.6%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.8%Danny Wicentowski: 5.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion3.8%This article: 3.6%Danny Wicentowski: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question3.6%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 2.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.6%Danny Wicentowski: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground11.6%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.6%Danny Wicentowski: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote6.6%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 20.4%Danny Wicentowski: 4.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…20.4%

422 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers48%attributed speech218writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJack Marsh • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJack Marsh • 28 words • 100.0% coverageJack Marsh • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJack Marsh • 16 words • 0.0% coverageChad Damiani • 15 words • 0.0% coverageChad Damiani • 2 words • 0.0% coverageChad Damiani • 14 words • 0.0% coverageChad Damiani • 49 words • 0.0% coverageChad Damiani • 26 words • 0.0% coverageChad Damiani • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Chad Damiani

98%flagged-word coverage
131 attributed words64% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -39.4 ptsWriter: 39.4%Chad Damiani: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.