STLPR0%

A judge and politician sought secrecy through the courts. Their plans have gone awry83%

By Danny Wicentowski0%

12/19/2025, 8:51:20 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 301 faulty-reasoning hits from 251 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 74.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (3,745 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the article peer group.

The Legal Roundtable takes up cases involving secrecy, lawsuits and discipline. 
A Missouri legislator facing accusations of assault. 
A St. Charles judge hauled before a disciplinary panel to explain why he dressed up as Elvis Presley. 
In both instances, the public figures at the center of these separate cases sought secrecy to keep their behavior out of the public eye  however, their legal maneuvers are now in the spotlight. 
In this December edition of the Legal Roundtable, our panel of expert attorneys dissects the cases of St. Charles Judge Matthew Thornhill and Missouri state Sen. Steve Roberts. 
This month’s panel of attorneys include former prosecutor Nicole Gorovsky; Mark Smith, the former vice chancellor and dean of career services at Washington University; and former federal prosecutor Javad Khazaeli. 
Along with the cases involving legal secrecy, the panel discusses Kim Gardner’s attempt to keep her law license, pharmaceutical giant Bayer's appeal of a jury verdict to the Missouri Supreme Court, and the City of Des Peres’ new law that aims to stop panhandling. 
To hear the full conversation with the Legal Roundtable, listen to “St. Louis on the Air” on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or YouTube, or click the play button below. 
“St. Louis on the Air” brings you the stories of St. Louis and the people who live, work and create in our region. 
The show is produced by Miya Norfleet, Emily Woodbury, Danny Wicentowski, Elaine Cha and Alex Heuer. 
The production intern is Darrious Varner. 
The audio engineer is Aaron Doerr. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Danny Wicentowski: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 20.7%Danny Wicentowski: 5.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect20.7%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 23.1%Danny Wicentowski: 3.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect23.1%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 41.0%Danny Wicentowski: 4.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias41.0%This article: 9.2%Danny Wicentowski: 3.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 2.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 23.1%Danny Wicentowski: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority23.1%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 5.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 3.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Danny Wicentowski: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%

251 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.