These 5,000-Year-Old Tombs May Hold the Secret Origins of the Pyramids 31%

By Elizabeth Rayne29%

7/2/2026, 6:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.8% saturation with 278 hits. Analysis detected 1,912 faulty-reasoning hits from 735 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.5% and a BS Rank of 31% (15,158 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the article peer group.

Every year, millions of tourists walk the scorching sands of the Giza plateau to stand in the shadow of the Great Pyramid of Khufu, next to the pyramids of Khafre and Menkaure. 
Most of the visitors gazing in wonder would never think that the monumental tombs piercing the heavens there had their foundations in much less impressive structures that rose out of the desert thousands of years before Pharaoh Khufu ascended the throne. 
Egyptian civilization didn’t begin with a pharaoh draped in gold, though. 
Narmer, who’s widely regarded as the first king of a unified Egypt, came to power around the dawn of the Early Dynastic Period, though rulers of his era would not be called “pharaohs” for at least another 1,500 years. 
While Narmer’s reign marked the beginning of dynastic rule, he predated the pyramids by centuries. 
Tombs, in fact, appeared in Egypt several millennia before they would ever reach the monumental heights seen at Giza. 
And recently, at the Jabal al-Tayr archaeological site in Egypt's Minya Governorate, a team from the Supreme Council of Antiquities has unearthed two Early Dynastic tombs that haven’t seen the light of day in 5,000 years. 
Jabal al-Tayr may not be as famous as the Valley of the Kings, but excavations beneath its sands have revealed that the site served as a burial ground from Predynastic times—before Narmer—until the Late Period (roughly 664–332 B.C.), when the last native pharaohs ruled Egypt. 
The ancient resting places at Jabal al-Tayr are shedding new light on how Egyptian tomb architecture evolved before the pyramids were built. 
Around 3100 B.C.E., the first tombs appeared as simple pits that were lined with bricks and plastered over. 
By the time of Narmer and the First Dynasty, larger and more lavish tombs housed the bodies of royals in Abydos, while nobles were interred at Saqqara. 
Like their predecessors, these grander tombs featured subterranean burial chambers, but they also boasted aboveground structures known as mastabas—storehouses for grave goods that signaled the status of the deceased. 
The newly unearthed tombs at Jabal al-Tayr show striking similarities to the tomb of King Hor-Den at Abydos, which was built around 2950 B.C.E. 
Hor-Den’s tomb was the largest one from the First Dynasty, with a ritual annex, two spacious storage rooms, and 133 other chambers surrounding the main burial chamber. 
The Jabal al-Tayr tombs have features that mirror Hor-Den’s, which may be evidence that early tomb architecture spread throughout Egypt even before the north and south were unified. 
As archaeologists dusted off the first tomb at Jabal al-Tayr, they were struck by how its walls appeared to have been purposely built broader and thicker at the bottom and gradually thinner until they reached the top. 
This suggests that its builders understood how to distribute structural weight. 
These early builders couldn’t have dreamed of the pyramids, but they may have been unknowingly laying the foundations for them. 
Mastabas were structures of mud brick or stone. 
Both of the Jabal al-Tayr tombs were made of stone blocks that workers pushed or carried to the site with the relentless Egyptian sun beating down on their backs. 
Some of the blocks from the first tomb were later removed and probably reused, but the remaining ones were intact enough for the archaeological team to observe oxide lines formed by cutting and shaping the stone. 
Its walls were also reinforced with wooden supports—some holding up individual segments, others spanning the full length of the wall. 
The second tomb survived with most of its stones still in place. 
Further research may reveal more about the people who built it. 
These tombs aren’t the only recent finds at Jabal al-Tayr. 
Nearby, archaeologists discovered Predynastic burials containing crouching, mostly skeletonized remains wrapped in plant mats, with pottery vessels placed beside them. 
The vessels were rimmed in black, typical of the Naqada II and Naqada III periods that preceded the First Dynasty. 
Burials from the Late Period with remnants of wooden coffins also emerged, suggesting that the site was used to inter the dead throughout many different eras. 
More tombs and artifacts may be waiting to see the light of Ra again. 
As excavations continue, the Ministry of Tourism explains in a Facebook post that “Work is underway at the site to reveal more of its secrets.” 
The mysteries of Egypt’s deep history continue to unfold before our eyes. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.6%Elizabeth Rayne: 4.1%Popular Mechanics: 4.4%Confirmation Bias13.6%This article: 5.3%Elizabeth Rayne: 1.3%Popular Mechanics: 1.1%Anchoring Bias5.3%This article: 14.6%Elizabeth Rayne: 3.4%Popular Mechanics: 3.1%Availability Heuristic14.6%This article: 15.2%Elizabeth Rayne: 1.7%Popular Mechanics: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic15.2%This article: 8.6%Elizabeth Rayne: 4.1%Popular Mechanics: 1.8%Hindsight Bias8.6%This article: 4.9%Elizabeth Rayne: 2.3%Popular Mechanics: 2.7%Overconfidence Bias4.9%This article: 1.5%Elizabeth Rayne: 4.2%Popular Mechanics: 3.6%Framing Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.7%Popular Mechanics: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.3%Popular Mechanics: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.6%Popular Mechanics: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 22.2%Elizabeth Rayne: 2.3%Popular Mechanics: 3.3%Optimism Bias22.2%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.8%Popular Mechanics: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Elizabeth Rayne: 5.9%Popular Mechanics: 5.3%Negativity Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.5%Popular Mechanics: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Elizabeth Rayne: 1.4%Popular Mechanics: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error1.5%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.3%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.2%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Elizabeth Rayne: 1.3%Popular Mechanics: 1.9%Halo Effect4.4%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.7%Elizabeth Rayne: 1.0%Popular Mechanics: 1.2%Recency Bias9.7%This article: 1.5%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 3.1%Popular Mechanics: 5.5%Appeal to Authority12.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 1.2%Popular Mechanics: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 6.5%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.4%Popular Mechanics: 0.4%Slippery Slope6.5%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.7%Elizabeth Rayne: 3.4%Popular Mechanics: 4.2%Hasty Generalization16.7%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.2%Popular Mechanics: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.9%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.2%Popular Mechanics: 0.3%Bandwagon1.9%This article: 16.1%Elizabeth Rayne: 5.2%Popular Mechanics: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion16.1%This article: 1.5%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.6%Popular Mechanics: 0.8%Begging the Question1.5%This article: 18.1%Elizabeth Rayne: 3.9%Popular Mechanics: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)18.1%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.6%Popular Mechanics: 0.6%Burden of Proof3.0%This article: 10.1%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.7%Popular Mechanics: 0.5%Appeal to Nature10.1%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.3%Popular Mechanics: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 2.6%Popular Mechanics: 2.6%Anecdotal5.0%This article: 1.5%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%No True Scotsman1.5%This article: 8.8%Elizabeth Rayne: 3.2%Popular Mechanics: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.8%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.2%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.4%Elizabeth Rayne: 1.3%Popular Mechanics: 1.4%Unattributed Quote3.4%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.7%Popular Mechanics: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 37.8%Elizabeth Rayne: 5.4%Popular Mechanics: 5.9%Biased Writer Voice37.8%This article: 2.7%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.3%Popular Mechanics: 1.1%Indoctrination2.7%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Elizabeth Rayne: 0.5%Popular Mechanics: 3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.9%

735 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers8.3%attributed speech674writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageSupreme Council of Antiquities • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageMinistry of Tourism • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ministry of Tourism

100%flagged-word coverage
25 attributed words41% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ministry of Tourism: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-41.2 ptsWriter: 41.2%Ministry of Tourism: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Ministry of Tourism: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.