The Verge56%

White House taps the guy who keeps crying ‘aliens’ to run UFO group 27%

By Terrence O'Brien58%

7/11/2026, 7:18:33 AM

Keywords: Policy, Politics, Science

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 944 faulty-reasoning hits from 459 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.2% and a BS Rank of 27% (16,099 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the article peer group.

White House taps the guy who keeps crying ‘aliens’ to run UFO group 
Avi Loeb is best known for making questionable claims about evidence of alien technology. 
Jul 11, 2026, 2:18 PM UTC 
Terrence O'Brien is the Verge’s weekend editor. 
He’s covered the tech industry for over 18 years and knows a thing or two about synths. 
Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb will head the UAP Science Advisory Council established by the White House, the Pentagon, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the FBI, and “the intelligence community.” 
The Council will provide scientific reports and advice to the UAP Governing Board, in an effort to “resolve the nature of UAP,” or unidentified anomalous phenomena. 
On paper, Loeb’s qualifications seem strong. 
And he’s surrounded himself with a team from a variety of backgrounds. 
The Council includes not only physicists, but a pathologist, a computer scientist, a philosopher, a psychologist, and even the founding publisher of Skeptic magazine. 
In recent years, however, Loeb has garnered attention for repeatedly claiming evidence of aliens. 
This had landed him plenty of TV appearances , but others in the scientific community largely dismiss Loeb as a fraud , crackpot , and grifter . 
His Harvard credentials and long career have granted him some legitimacy. 
But he’s been making questionable claims about alien life since at least 2015. 
Now he’s best known for suggesting that Oumuamua was not an exo-comet, but an alien probe ; and that small metal spheres found in the ocean were the wreckage of an alien spacecraft . 
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. 
I spent a week using the Trump phone  it sucks 
The FCC is cracking down on DJI tech that dodged the foreign drone ban 
ICE are heavily armed killers. 
They’re also huge losers 
Apple sues OpenAI for allegedly stealing hardware secrets 
A decade later, Pokémon Go finally made good on its original promise 
Advertiser Content From 
This is the title for the native ad 
Empathy for the optimizers 
Microsoft’s carbon emissions went up 25 percent last year 
Starlink deployments on record pace 
Fi’s Starlink-enabled pet tracker found my dog when LTE couldn’t 
Five questions for Dr. 
Rubin, who’s armed with a mic and a bowtie 
NASA launched an emergency mission to stop the Swift Observatory from crashing to Earth 
Victoria Song Jul 10 
Stevie Bonifield Jul 10 
Jennifer Pattison Tuohy and Thomas Ricker Jul 8 
Terrence O'Brien Jul 4 
Are you filthy enough for a $700 portable shower? 
A tasty RPG that will make you very hungry 
ICE is threatening to deport witnesses of its latest shooting 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 4.3%The Verge: 3.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.1%The Verge: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.5%Terrence O'Brien: 3.8%The Verge: 3.8%Availability Heuristic15.5%This article: 12.2%Terrence O'Brien: 0.8%The Verge: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic12.2%This article: 2.6%Terrence O'Brien: 1.1%The Verge: 0.7%Hindsight Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.8%The Verge: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Terrence O'Brien: 8.9%The Verge: 6.2%Framing Effect8.9%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.6%The Verge: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.4%Terrence O'Brien: 0.3%The Verge: 0.5%Status Quo Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.3%The Verge: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 2.1%The Verge: 4.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 1.8%The Verge: 2.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 27.0%Terrence O'Brien: 12.1%The Verge: 9.7%Negativity Bias27.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 1.0%The Verge: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.4%The Verge: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.3%The Verge: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.7%The Verge: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 1.5%The Verge: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Terrence O'Brien: 2.9%The Verge: 2.8%Halo Effect10.7%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.6%The Verge: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.0%The Verge: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Terrence O'Brien: 1.3%The Verge: 1.8%Recency Bias3.1%This article: 3.1%Terrence O'Brien: 0.9%The Verge: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 13.5%Terrence O'Brien: 3.4%The Verge: 1.1%Ad Hominem13.5%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 1.0%The Verge: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 21.4%Terrence O'Brien: 6.1%The Verge: 4.0%Appeal to Authority21.4%This article: 2.0%Terrence O'Brien: 1.1%The Verge: 1.6%False Dilemma2.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 1.6%The Verge: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.4%The Verge: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.2%Terrence O'Brien: 5.9%The Verge: 6.8%Hasty Generalization12.2%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.4%The Verge: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.9%Terrence O'Brien: 1.3%The Verge: 0.7%Bandwagon5.9%This article: 8.3%Terrence O'Brien: 6.6%The Verge: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion8.3%This article: 5.7%Terrence O'Brien: 1.5%The Verge: 1.1%Begging the Question5.7%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 3.5%The Verge: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.3%The Verge: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.5%The Verge: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.0%The Verge: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.6%Terrence O'Brien: 0.2%The Verge: 0.3%Composition/Division2.6%This article: 4.6%Terrence O'Brien: 2.7%The Verge: 3.6%Anecdotal4.6%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.1%The Verge: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 23.1%Terrence O'Brien: 2.6%The Verge: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)23.1%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.0%The Verge: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.1%The Verge: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.2%The Verge: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.2%The Verge: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 3.2%The Verge: 2.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 2.9%The Verge: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.8%Terrence O'Brien: 11.4%The Verge: 10.8%Biased Writer Voice7.8%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 2.0%The Verge: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 3.5%The Verge: 1.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.1%The Verge: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.3%Terrence O'Brien: 3.7%The Verge: 4.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…13.3%

459 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers13%attributed speech401writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageTerrence O'Brien • 7 words • 0.0% coverageTerrence O'Brien • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageNASA • 14 words • 0.0% coverageVictoria Song • 4 words • 0.0% coverageStevie Bonifield • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJennifer Pattison Tuohy • 8 words • 0.0% coverageTerrence O'Brien • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Terrence O'Brien

61%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words48% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -15.2 ptsWriter: 15.2%Terrence O'Brien: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.0 ptsWriter: 9.0%Terrence O'Brien: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.