CBC Radio49%

No passport, no problem. Meet the border-hopping cat who comes and goes as he pleases 10%

By Kayla McLean0%

3/19/2026, 2:32:47 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Halo Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 54% saturation with 259 hits. Analysis detected 1,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 480 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.8% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,782 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the article peer group.

On Zero Avenue in South Surrey, B.C. lives a cat without a care in the world, and a supercilious name to match. 
Louis Vuitton has become a local legend for doing with ease what most humans wouldn’t dare. 
Each day, he leaps back and forth across a narrow ditch that sits smack dab on the Canada-U.S. border. 
“He hasn’t always been such a rebel, but he is extremely friendly,” Deb Tate, Louis' owner, told As It Happens host Nil Koksal. 
He just loves people, says Tate, and he doesn't care what side of the border they're on. 
“He will walk up, greet people, get his pats and belly rubs and then continue on when he’s done.” 
<h2>Going viral</h2> 
On one side of the ditch is a row of charming homes, including his own, on Canadian soil. 
On the other are the green fields of Peace Arch Historical State Park in the United States. 
There aren't any fences, just a street in between and a shallow divide. 
According to Tate, there are plenty of cameras and hawk-eyed border guards patrolling nearby, ready to pounce on illegal crossers. 
But none of that seems to concern Louis, who trapezes across whenever he wants, with the air of someone who knows the rules, and chooses to ignore them. 
Louis, who turns six on Canada Day, has been lapping up all the attention from locals since he caught the eye of Instagram user @pnwdaily360, who posted a now viral video about “the border-hopping kitty.” 
Louis' owner, Deb Tate says he's been known to occasionally smuggle "goods" across the border and leave them on her doorstep. 
“There’s a cat that doesn’t really give a f--k about borders,” says the user in the video. 
“And he comes over and hunts in the ditch. 
There he is. 
What’s up buddy?” 
The video has since garnered over 220,000 likes and three million views on Instagram. 
<h2>A smuggler, too</h2> 
Tate says Louis even has a habit of smuggling things across the border, dropping it ever so thoughtfully on her doorstep. 
“He’s been known to bring home a treat or two from his adventures,” said Tate. 
“We’ve received everything from snakes and mice and squirrels, much to my chagrin.” 
As for his name, Tate says it wasn't given to him because he has a penchant for luxury goods at duty-free prices. 
“He’s a rescue kitty, and we decided that coming from humble beginnings, he deserved a designer name,” said Tate. 
“We just named him Louis and  he has just grown in to fill the personality, and more.” 
So far, Tate says there’s been no word from the actual Louis Vuitton fashion house. 
“Who knows what the coming days and weeks will bring, but for now, [Louis is] completely oblivious and just loving life,” said Tate. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.4%Kayla McLean: 1.6%CBC: 2.6%Confirmation Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.8%CBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.8%Kayla McLean: 3.3%CBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic14.8%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 1.3%CBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.7%CBC: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 1.6%CBC: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 11.7%Kayla McLean: 4.9%CBC: 4.2%Framing Effect11.7%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.4%CBC: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.7%Kayla McLean: 1.0%CBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.1%CBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 19.4%Kayla McLean: 5.3%CBC: 4.0%Optimism Bias19.4%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 1.1%CBC: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Kayla McLean: 5.9%CBC: 5.7%Negativity Bias11.0%This article: 4.6%Kayla McLean: 1.5%CBC: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias4.6%This article: 14.2%Kayla McLean: 2.3%CBC: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error14.2%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.1%CBC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 1.0%CBC: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.1%CBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 30.2%Kayla McLean: 4.8%CBC: 3.6%Halo Effect30.2%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.6%Kayla McLean: 1.0%CBC: 1.2%Recency Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.5%CBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.1%CBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.1%Kayla McLean: 5.0%CBC: 3.7%Appeal to Authority12.1%This article: 3.5%Kayla McLean: 1.4%CBC: 1.3%False Dilemma3.5%This article: 0.6%Kayla McLean: 0.6%CBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.6%This article: 3.8%Kayla McLean: 0.1%CBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning3.8%This article: 3.3%Kayla McLean: 3.6%CBC: 4.8%Hasty Generalization3.3%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.1%CBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.6%Kayla McLean: 1.0%CBC: 0.6%Bandwagon5.6%This article: 12.1%Kayla McLean: 3.3%CBC: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion12.1%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.5%CBC: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.1%Kayla McLean: 3.0%CBC: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.1%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.1%CBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.2%CBC: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.4%CBC: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 54.0%Kayla McLean: 7.7%CBC: 3.3%Anecdotal54.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.1%CBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 30.4%Kayla McLean: 1.9%CBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)30.4%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.1%CBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 5.8%Kayla McLean: 0.1%CBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity5.8%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.2%CBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 17.3%Kayla McLean: 2.2%CBC: 1.1%Unattributed Quote17.3%This article: 5.8%Kayla McLean: 0.4%CBC: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection5.8%This article: 22.1%Kayla McLean: 3.3%CBC: 4.8%Biased Writer Voice22.1%This article: 8.3%Kayla McLean: 1.2%CBC: 2.4%Indoctrination8.3%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.2%CBC: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kayla McLean: 0.9%CBC: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

480 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker51%attributed speech234writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDeb Tate • 23 words • 100.0% coverageDeb Tate • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDeb Tate • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDeb Tate • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageDeb Tate • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageDeb Tate • 21 words • 100.0% coverageDeb Tate • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDeb Tate • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDeb Tate • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDeb Tate • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDeb Tate • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDeb Tate • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDeb Tate • 23 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Deb Tate

100%flagged-word coverage
246 attributed words100% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-27.8 ptsWriter: 36.3%Deb Tate: 8.5%8.5%Unattributed Quote+33.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Deb Tate: 33.7%33.7%Quote-first Misdirection-12.0 ptsWriter: 12.0%Deb Tate: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+2.1 ptsWriter: 7.3%Deb Tate: 9.3%9.3%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.