Pete Buttigieg Target of Vile Attack on His Young Family 25%

By Hafiz Rashid68%

6/26/2026, 2:05:23 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Begging the Question, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 186 hits. Analysis detected 1,345 faulty-reasoning hits from 638 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.2% and a BS Rank of 25% (16,519 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the article peer group.

Former Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg and his family were the victims of a false child protective services report, he wrote on his Substack Friday. 
“Many times over the years, I have been denounced, yelled at, protested, threatened, and heckled. 
I’ve been through political attacks in office, death threats in public life, and rocket attacks in war. 
But this is the ugliest thing that has happened to me since my career in service began,” Buttigieg wrote. 
Buttigieg said that earlier this week, a police officer and CPS worker showed up at his Traverse City, Michigan, home, where he lives with his husband, Chasten, and their twins, Joseph August and Penelope Rose. 
They told Buttigieg that a serious allegation had been made against him regarding his children, and that he couldn’t be alone with them until they received a forensic interview the next day, without him or any relatives present. 
Then they would discuss the allegations with the former South Bend, Indiana, mayor. 
The officer and social worker wished to see the two 4-year-olds, so Buttigieg told them to wait until Chasten would be returning with the children from summer camp. 
When they arrived, the kids were fascinated by the police officer’s car, and the adults agreed that the children would stay with their grandparents overnight before their interview the next day. 
“The twenty-four hours until they returned are among the darkest hours of my life. 
I tried to get my head around the idea that I had been accused of something so serious that I couldn’t be alone around my own children, and had consented to have them interviewed by strangers, without my knowing where the accusation had come from or even what it contained,” wrote Buttigieg. 
After the children were interviewed, they went to stay with their grandparents, Buttigieg wrote, and then the police officer and CPS worker met him at his home for an interview. 
The officer said that an anonymous woman had contacted CPS, saying that she had met Buttigieg years ago at a conference in Alabama, who allegedly told her that he had committed “unspeakable violent crimes, and the caller believed my children were still at risk.” 
The police officer asked if Buttigieg had been to a certain town in Alabama, to which he replied no, as well as “a couple of obvious questions.” 
After that, the officer said that he believed the accusation was politically motivated and that it would not be referred to a prosecutor. 
The CPS worker also said the allegation could not be substantiated, although her process would take longer to complete. 
But Buttigieg was allowed to be alone with his children again, and Chasten was told the same information from the officer and CPS worker, and the two were able to pick up their children. 
“For twenty-four deeply distressing hours, we had no idea what I was accused of or what was about to happen. 
We could not understand someone abusing the system like this in order to hurt me and my family with an absurd and easily refuted allegation of a horrific crime,” Buttigieg wrote. 
“We’re used to nasty, hateful, and sometimes violent things being said about us and even about our family. 
But this is the first time someone managed to invade our lives like this—and drag our children into it,” Buttigieg added. 
Buttigieg has been targeted by the right for his same-sex marriage and position within the Biden administration, facing false allegations of sexual assault in 2019 and, bizarrely, receiving mockery and criticism for taking paternity leave as a Cabinet secretary during the Biden administration. 
Making a false allegation and targeting a politician’s children is an egregious crime, and should be roundly condemned across the political spectrum. 
Let’s see if conservatives actually do the right thing. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.8%Hafiz Rashid: 7.5%newrepublic.com: 6.1%Confirmation Bias11.8%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.1%Hafiz Rashid: 4.3%newrepublic.com: 3.3%Availability Heuristic9.1%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.2%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Hafiz Rashid: 10.9%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Framing Effect10.5%This article: 8.2%Hafiz Rashid: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.4%Loss Aversion8.2%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.3%Hafiz Rashid: 3.0%newrepublic.com: 2.5%Pessimism Bias8.3%This article: 22.9%Hafiz Rashid: 16.7%newrepublic.com: 13.3%Negativity Bias22.9%This article: 4.9%Hafiz Rashid: 1.9%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 2.9%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Hafiz Rashid: 1.8%newrepublic.com: 1.7%In-Group Bias6.7%This article: 8.2%Hafiz Rashid: 1.5%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 1.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Hafiz Rashid: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Primacy Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 3.5%newrepublic.com: 3.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 4.2%newrepublic.com: 3.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 1.4%Hafiz Rashid: 1.2%newrepublic.com: 1.9%False Dilemma1.4%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.2%Hafiz Rashid: 8.6%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Hasty Generalization8.2%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 11.6%Hafiz Rashid: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Bandwagon11.6%This article: 29.2%Hafiz Rashid: 6.1%newrepublic.com: 6.3%Appeal to Emotion29.2%This article: 18.2%Hafiz Rashid: 1.9%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Begging the Question18.2%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 3.5%newrepublic.com: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 2.1%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.2%Hafiz Rashid: 3.9%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Anecdotal5.2%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 4.2%Hafiz Rashid: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Personal Incredulity4.2%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.8%Hafiz Rashid: 4.0%newrepublic.com: 2.3%Unattributed Quote10.8%This article: 11.4%Hafiz Rashid: 3.1%newrepublic.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection11.4%This article: 5.3%Hafiz Rashid: 14.6%newrepublic.com: 15.5%Biased Writer Voice5.3%This article: 4.9%Hafiz Rashid: 1.8%newrepublic.com: 2.4%Indoctrination4.9%This article: 6.7%Hafiz Rashid: 7.0%newrepublic.com: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.5%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

638 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker67%attributed speech210writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 25 words • 100.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 15 words • 100.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 17 words • 0.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 19 words • 0.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 35 words • 0.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 28 words • 0.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 31 words • 0.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 14 words • 100.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 52 words • 0.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 34 words • 0.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 20 words • 0.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 31 words • 0.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 18 words • 0.0% coveragePete Buttigieg • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Pete Buttigieg

70%flagged-word coverage
428 attributed words100% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Unattributed Quote-15.1 ptsWriter: 21.0%Pete Buttigieg: 5.8%5.8%Quote-first Misdirection-14.2 ptsWriter: 21.0%Pete Buttigieg: 6.8%6.8%Politically Left Leaning B-20.5 ptsWriter: 20.5%Pete Buttigieg: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-14.8 ptsWriter: 14.8%Pete Buttigieg: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.5 ptsWriter: 9.0%Pete Buttigieg: 3.5%3.5%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.