KUER0%

How do abortion bans impact a state's workforce and economy? 30%

By Hannah Merzbach0%

4/6/2026, 8:47:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 140 hits. Analysis detected 1,460 faulty-reasoning hits from 868 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.9% and a BS Rank of 30% (14,898 of 21,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the article peer group.

Since a partial abortion ban went into effect in Wyoming in early March, women have been leaving the state to seek care, traveling hours to Colorado and Montana. 
Some worry there could be a permanent exodus from the state, and that could impact the workforce long term. 
"People of childbearing age are leaving this state, and it's just gonna get worse with stuff like this," said Janean Forsyth, who leads the nonprofit Chelsea's Fund, which helps people access abortions in the state. 
Wyoming's new Human Heartbeat Act bans abortion when cardiac activity is detected. 
That's typically around six weeks, when many people may not know they're pregnant. 
"Nothing about this bill promotes economic growth or stability," Forsyth said. 
A working paper from the nonprofit National Bureau of Economic Research shows that states with abortion bans may lose thousands of residents a year. 
In many places, that includes doctors. 
In Idaho, home to one of the strictest abortion bans in the country, researchers found there are 35% fewer OB-GYNs than before the law went into effect. 
Forsyth worries the same could happen in Wyoming, where there's already an OB-GYN shortage. 
But some lawmakers in Wyoming's Republican supermajority disagree. 
They're concerned about what the state's aging population could mean for the economy. 
"How do we get, like, a younger population and keep that younger population here?" 
asked state Sen. 
Evie Brennan (R-Cheyenne). 
The former nurse said banning abortion is one piece. 
"We're sending a message that children are important and that they're the future," Brennan said. 
In fact, the Human Heartbeat Act even directly says the state has a "compelling interest in providing for the state's future population and societal and economic security by promoting childbirth." 
This echoes pro-natalist rhetoric from President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance. 
"I'll be known as the fertilization president," Trump said at a press conference, while promising to advance IVF. 
"Let me say very simply, I want more babies in the United States of America," said Vance at a 2025 March for Life rally. 
The U.S.'s fertility rate, the number of babies per 1,000 women of reproductive age, is falling, which could mean not having enough people to care for an aging population or contribute to the economy. 
But does banning abortion help? 
Probably not, according to John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health demographer Suzanne Bell. 
"Imposing a ban on abortion is not going to transform the trajectory of a state's fertility patterns," said Bell. 
However, it could lead to a slight, short-term bump, like in Idaho in 2023. 
Bell's research shows that the fertility rate there was 1.3% higher than what was expected without the ban. 
"What that works out to in absolute terms is about 240 excess births," Bell said, which she adds is significant in terms of fertility patterns. 
But she said that doesn't necessarily translate to more workers and economic growth. 
Those children would then have to grow up and decide to stay in the state and join the workforce. 
According to the long running Turnaway Study out of the University of California, children born as a result of an abortion denial are more likely to live below the federal poverty level. 
That's compared to children born from a later pregnancy to women who received an abortion to terminate a previous pregnancy. 
Plus, women who are denied abortions are more likely to face economic insecurity than those who receive one. 
Other studies show women often leave the workplace or take lower positions when they can't afford childcare. 
" I think that our pro-life movement has done a whole bunch of things to say each life is important," said Sen. 
Brennan, the Wyoming lawmaker who's also a mother of four. 
"But we're not as good at putting in place, like, how do you care for that mother during pregnancy and how do you care for that mom and that baby or that young family that needs a little bit extra support?" 
she said. 
Brennan said she hopes the Wyoming Legislature, churches, nonprofits and private groups have more robust conversations around children and other ways to support women and children, once courts weigh in on the new abortion law, which is now being challenged. 
An emergency hearing that could block the partial ban and restore abortion access in Wyoming could happen any day. 
This comes after the state's supreme court struck down two near-total abortion bans as unconstitutional earlier this year. 
"Once we've heard from the courts, then I think we can take a step back and see, like, is this having [an] effect on our workforce?" 
Brennan said. 
"Is it really doing what we intended it to do?" 
This story was produced by the Mountain West News Bureau, a collaboration between Wyoming Public Media, Nevada Public Radio, Boise State Public Radio in Idaho, KUNR in Nevada, KUNC in Northern Colorado, KANW in New Mexico, Colorado Public Radio, KJZZ in Arizona and NPR, with additional support from affiliate newsrooms across the region. 
Funding for the Mountain West News Bureau is provided in part by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and Eric and Wendy Schmidt. 
Copyright 2026 Wyoming Public Radio News 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.1%Hannah Merzbach: 1.4%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 1.0%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.2%Hannah Merzbach: 4.4%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic12.2%This article: 1.6%Hannah Merzbach: 0.6%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic1.6%This article: 2.1%Hannah Merzbach: 0.4%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias2.1%This article: 5.1%Hannah Merzbach: 0.7%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias5.1%This article: 8.2%Hannah Merzbach: 11.5%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect8.2%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 1.2%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.2%Hannah Merzbach: 0.9%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.6%Hannah Merzbach: 6.3%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias4.6%This article: 14.5%Hannah Merzbach: 4.2%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias14.5%This article: 5.5%Hannah Merzbach: 5.1%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias5.5%This article: 2.5%Hannah Merzbach: 2.1%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.2%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Hannah Merzbach: 4.7%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Hannah Merzbach: 3.1%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.4%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 1.1%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.1%Hannah Merzbach: 5.1%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority16.1%This article: 1.5%Hannah Merzbach: 1.7%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma1.5%This article: 1.6%Hannah Merzbach: 1.4%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope1.6%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.7%Hannah Merzbach: 3.8%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization6.7%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 2.2%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.7%Hannah Merzbach: 6.2%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion13.7%This article: 5.2%Hannah Merzbach: 0.5%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question5.2%This article: 12.3%Hannah Merzbach: 2.0%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.3%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.7%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof3.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 4.9%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.6%Hannah Merzbach: 1.2%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.6%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.3%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.6%Hannah Merzbach: 0.9%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote12.6%This article: 3.8%Hannah Merzbach: 1.1%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection3.8%This article: 4.8%Hannah Merzbach: 0.7%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice4.8%This article: 4.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.3%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination4.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Hannah Merzbach: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Hannah Merzbach: 0.0%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

868 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers38%attributed speech542writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageJanean Forsyth • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJanean Forsyth • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageJanean Forsyth • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageEvie Brennan • 9 words • 0.0% coverageEvie Brennan • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 18 words • 100.0% coverageJD Vance • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageSuzanne Bell • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageSuzanne Bell • 25 words • 0.0% coverageSuzanne Bell • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageEvie Brennan • 41 words • 0.0% coverageEvie Brennan • 2 words • 0.0% coverageEvie Brennan • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageEvie Brennan • 26 words • 0.0% coverageEvie Brennan • 2 words • 100.0% coverageMountain West News Bureau • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 0.0% coverageWyoming Public Radio News • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Janean Forsyth

100%flagged-word coverage
60 attributed words18% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Indoctrination+58.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Janean Forsyth: 58.3%58.3%Unattributed Quote-12.4 ptsWriter: 12.4%Janean Forsyth: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.7 ptsWriter: 7.7%Janean Forsyth: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Janean Forsyth: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.