KCUR57%

Kansas City native Bridget Howard makes history on the Royals broadcast team 1%

By Brian Ellison0% Zach Wilson0%

3/28/2026, 4:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), In-Group Bias, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 311 faulty-reasoning hits from 309 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 1% (21,710 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the article peer group.

This season, Kansas City Royals fans will see a new face on the team's television broadcasts: Bridget Howard. 
The Kansas City native will be the first woman to be a regular part of Royals broadcasts. 
She joined KCUR's Up To Date to talk about her new role and what to look for in the 2026 season. 
The season is now underway for the Kansas City Royals, as the team begins a three-game series in Atlanta against the Braves. 
When the team plays its first game of the year at Kauffman Stadium on Monday, fans watching on TV will notice a new team member on the Royals television broadcast. 
Bridget Howard, a Kansas City native and Kansas State University alum, is now working as a host and sideline reporter for the Royals, primarily at home games. 
In her new role, she will be the first woman to be a regular part of Royals broadcasts. 
During the course of her career, Howard has worked as a sideline reporter for college football and college basketball games, and has even called play-by-play for National Women's Soccer League matches. 
Howard's father, David, played several seasons for the Royals before she was born, and later worked for the Boston Red Sox. 
As a result, Howard says baseball is "second nature" for her. 
"I think for me, I grew up in baseball. 
I grew up going to spring training for the first 16 years of my life," Howard told Up To Date. 
"I think that's what I'm most excited about: to be at the ballpark every single day. 
And, I love telling stories. 
You know, that's a huge part of what I do, and so being able to merge the two things that I love most is going to be really special for me." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.6%Brian Ellison: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 8.7%Brian Ellison: 2.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic8.7%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Brian Ellison: 1.9%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect3.9%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 15.2%Brian Ellison: 3.8%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias15.2%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Brian Ellison: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias4.5%This article: 6.8%Brian Ellison: 1.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error6.8%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Brian Ellison: 2.5%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias10.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Brian Ellison: 2.5%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect10.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.0%Brian Ellison: 2.5%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority10.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.6%Brian Ellison: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.6%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.5%Brian Ellison: 1.6%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal6.5%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.3%Brian Ellison: 2.8%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.3%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.5%Brian Ellison: 1.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote6.5%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 3.8%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Ellison: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

309 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker26%attributed speech228writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageBridget Howard • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBridget Howard • 20 words • 100.0% coverageBridget Howard • 16 words • 0.0% coverageBridget Howard • 5 words • 0.0% coverageBridget Howard • 31 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bridget Howard

100%flagged-word coverage
81 attributed words100% of attributed speech60% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Unattributed Quote+24.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Bridget Howard: 24.7%24.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.