BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and False Dilemma, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,310 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.7% and a BS Rank of 30% (15,455 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the article peer group.

The Phillies' Jonathan Bowlan has been one of baseball's most effective relievers over the past two-plus months. 
Read more Yong Kim / Staff Photographer 
by David Murphy | Columnist 
Published July 13, 2026, 5:01 a.m. 
ET 
How much does Dave Dombrowski believe in his best acquisition of the offseason? 
By several metrics, Jonathan Bowlan has been one of the most productive relievers in the majors over the last  months. 
Since May 3, he ranks among the top 15 in the majors in the following categories: 
Strikeout rate (33.7%, 11th) 
Walk rate (4.8%, 15th) 
Strikeout/walk ratio (7.00, 8th) 
Ground-ball rate (58.3%, 15th) 
And then there is the most important category. 
Heading into Sunday, only three pitchers carried a lower ERA than the 0.86 that Bowlan had posted in his last 21 outings. 
All three are household names: Robert Suarez (Braves), Luke Weaver (Mets) and Mason Miller (Padres). 
» READ MORE: Kevin McGonigle dreamed of going to an All-Star Game in Philly. 
Now the Delco native is playing in one. 
That trio has logged a ton of high-leverage innings over the years. 
The question Dombrowski must ask himself: Can Bowlan do the same? 
The answer should play a big role in the Phillies  trade deadline strategy. 
The back of their bullpen has been leaking some serious oil as of late. 
Since June 1, Orion Kerkering , Brad Keller, and Jose Alvarado have combined to allow 18 of 42 batters to reach base in high-leverage situations in the seventh, eighth or ninth inning. 
Of those 18 baserunners, nine have scored. 
At this point, Kerkering shouldn’t be a serious consideration when the Phillies are projecting the top of their postseason depth chart. 
The 25-year-old righty’s struggles in pressure situations was a recurring theme even before last October’s meltdown in Game 4 at Dodger Stadium. 
Over the last two regular seasons, Kerkering has 37 strikeouts against 22 walks and hit-by-pitches in high-leverage situations. 
In the last two weeks, he has entered two late-game situations and then proceeded to walk three batters. 
There is nothing Kerkering can do between now and the trade deadline that should make the Phillies more comfortable with him high on the pecking order behind Jhoan Duran . 
Alvarado is fast approaching that point. 
The veteran lefty entered Sunday having allowed runs in eight of his last 19 outings, and at least two runs in six of them. 
Only two relievers in the majors had pitched as many innings as him with a higher ERA. 
The numbers are a little bit confusing. 
His 28.5 strikeout rate ranks 29th out of 171 qualified relievers. 
Although his walk rate is slightly worse than league average, it is markedly better than any that he posted during his prime years of 2021-24 (8.9% this season vs. a minimum of 10.5% previously). 
His fielding independent metrics are better than they’ve been since 2023. 
Even taking all of that into consideration, Alvarado is a dramatically different pitcher than he was in 2022 and 2023, when he stuck out 37% of his batters with a 2.14 FIP (3.38 this season). 
It’s fine to consider him a wild card vs. writing him out of the picture completely. 
But he won’t be anything more than a wild card before the trade deadline. 
» READ MORE: What makes Bryce Harper and Kyle Schwarber such unique stars? 
We asked each about the other. 
Keller? 
Even without the forearm issue, the Phillies haven’t seen much to make them comfortable heading into a postseason as the primary bridge to Duran. 
Opposing hitters have posted a whopping .856 OPS against him in high-leverage situations. 
In an ideal world, the 30-year-old is a sixth- or seventh-inning arm come October. 
Which brings us back to Bowlan. 
Acquired in an offseason trade that sent Matt Strahm to Kansas City, Bowlan appears to have elbowed his way into his manager’s circle of trust. 
On Saturday night, Don Mattingly turned to Bowlan with two on and nobody out in the bottom of the eighth inning to protect a 4-1 lead. 
After hitting his first batter with a pitch to load the bases, Bowlan got Spencer Torkelson to ground into a double play. 
He escaped the inning with just the one run scored, walking Riley Greene before getting Eduardo Valencia to ground out. 
MLB All-Star Game in Philly 
Baseball's biggest stars are descending on Philadelphia for the 96th All-Star Game at Citizens Bank Park on July 14. 
Follow all of The Inquirer's coverage here. 
Everything you need to know about the All-Star Game 
Meet the All-Stars: What to know about baseball's best coming to town 
Phillies get a sixth All-Star as Jesús Luzardo is added to NL roster 
Kyle Schwarber joins Bryce Harper in the Home Run Derby 
Who's competing in the Home Run Derby? 
Here's who is in already 
MLB All-Star Week brings a Philly MVP back to Citizens Bank Park's food lineup 
It wasn’t exactly the cleanest audition. 
But maybe that counts for something. 
This was a big-boy spot. 
Middle of the order, a trio of young power hitters, two men already on base. 
To hit a batter and walk a batter and only allow one run at least shows a little bit of intestinal fortitude. 
If Mattingly is going to make Bowlan his primary eighth-inning arm for the foreseeable future, then he is doing the right thing. 
At 6-foot-6 and 240 pounds, the 29-year-old righty sure looks the part. 
But that is still very much a hypothetical. 
Bowlan was predominantly a middle-innings guy during his three years in Kansas City. 
He isn’t a classic strikeout arm, whatever the overall numbers say this year. 
He has seven of them in 28 high-leverage plate appearances this season, compared with four walks. 
Again, though, the sample size is small. 
The Phillies would be wise to get a longer look at him. 
In the meantime, there really isn’t a question about the trade deadline and the bullpen. 
The Phillies need to do everything they can to address it. 
A lot of people seem to want to frame it as an either/or, with regard to their clear holes in the outfield and/or from the right side of the plate. 
That’s not the right way to look at it. 
After this latest virtuoso performance by the top two pitchers in the Phillies’ rotation, and with Bryce Harper and Kyle Schwarber hitting like MVP candidates, Dombrowski can’t afford to pick and choose which holes he fills this July. 
Last year, the Blue Jays acquired Louis Varland and Ty France from the Twins in a deadline deal. 
The Phillies themselves landed Duran and Harrison Bader. 
They can and should be thinking quantity. 
The real question right now is quality. 
Do the Phillies need an eighth-inning version of Duran? 
Or can they get by with a Varland type? 
A lot depends on how they feel about Bowlan. 
Because, right now, he looks like the only viable option. 
Watch the latest episode 
Ryan Howard was a three-time All-Star and champion of the 2006 Home Run Derby in his legendary run with the Phillies. 
With the baseball world coming together in Philadelphia for the 96th All-Star Game, Howard sat down with Phillies Extra to discuss his All-Star memories, his expectations for a Home Run Derby at Citizens Bank Park, his outlook on the Phillies' season, Kyle Schwarber's chances of breaking his single-season franchise mark for homers, and more. 
Watch here . 
You can also subscribe to the podcast version of Phillies Extra on Spotify or Apple Podcasts . 
Previous episodes : Dan Baker | Ricky Bottalico | Preston Mattingly | Caleb Cotham | Larry Bowa | Joe Maddon | Rhys Hoskins | Terry Francona | Aaron Rowand 
I write opinion and analysis pieces, with a heavy emphasis on the four professional sports teams. 
Community Guidelines 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.0%David Murphy: 4.2%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Confirmation Bias4.0%This article: 1.6%David Murphy: 2.1%Inquirer.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias1.6%This article: 3.4%David Murphy: 1.5%Inquirer.com: 2.5%Availability Heuristic3.4%This article: 4.4%David Murphy: 2.1%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic4.4%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.5%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%David Murphy: 3.0%Inquirer.com: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias2.2%This article: 9.2%David Murphy: 5.1%Inquirer.com: 5.0%Framing Effect9.2%This article: 0.8%David Murphy: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.8%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.6%David Murphy: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.6%This article: 3.1%David Murphy: 2.5%Inquirer.com: 2.7%Optimism Bias3.1%This article: 7.6%David Murphy: 1.7%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Pessimism Bias7.6%This article: 4.4%David Murphy: 4.6%Inquirer.com: 5.7%Negativity Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%David Murphy: 3.4%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Halo Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 15.3%David Murphy: 5.2%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Recency Bias15.3%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.5%David Murphy: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.5%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 2.3%David Murphy: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Straw Man2.3%This article: 2.5%David Murphy: 1.8%Inquirer.com: 2.3%Appeal to Authority2.5%This article: 6.7%David Murphy: 3.2%Inquirer.com: 1.1%False Dilemma6.7%This article: 2.3%David Murphy: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Slippery Slope2.3%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.6%David Murphy: 7.2%Inquirer.com: 3.3%Hasty Generalization5.6%This article: 2.1%David Murphy: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Red Herring2.1%This article: 1.5%David Murphy: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Bandwagon1.5%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 2.0%Inquirer.com: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 3.1%David Murphy: 1.2%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Begging the Question3.1%This article: 3.1%David Murphy: 1.5%Inquirer.com: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.1%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.4%David Murphy: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Burden of Proof4.4%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.8%David Murphy: 0.9%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Anecdotal3.8%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.0%David Murphy: 1.0%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.0%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.7%David Murphy: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.7%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 1.5%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.1%David Murphy: 5.9%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Biased Writer Voice3.1%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 3.4%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Murphy: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%David Murphy: 0.8%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.4%

1310 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers0.9%attributed speech1,298writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Murphy • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageThe Inquirer • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

The Inquirer

100%flagged-word coverage
7 attributed words58% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +98.2 ptsWriter: 1.8%The Inquirer: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%The Inquirer: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.