This 17-year-old from Lower Merion was booed during the Home Run Derby. He called it ‘an honor’ 8%

By Alex Coffey6%

7/14/2026, 5:25:56 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 378 faulty-reasoning hits from 599 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 24.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (20,270 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the article peer group.

On Monday night, Reed Weiner was standing in left center field at Citizens Bank Park when the Cardinals’ Jordan Walker hit a pop-up. 
It was the first round of the Home Run Derby, and Weiner and his friend, Ashton Kaliner, were shagging baseballs. 
Weiner started running and stuck his glove out, but didn’t catch it. 
He received a hearty round of boos from the Philadelphia crowd. 
» READ MORE: Schwarbombs, boos and a walkoff: A 3D look at how Jordan Walker ruined a near storybook Home Run Derby for Phillies fans 
The 17-year-old from Lower Merion, who just graduated from Harriton, had a different take. 
“I loved that,” he said of the boos. 
“I think it’s an honor, to be honest. 
Like, when I go to Phillies games, I love that stuff. 
I’ll boo everyone.” 
Weiner said that was the only catch he missed all night. 
He is not much of a baseball player; the teenager briefly joined Lower Merion Little League, but hasn’t roamed an outfield since. 
He found out he’d be shagging baseballs on Saturday. 
Kaliner’s father works for the Phillies, and was able to pull some strings. 
The teenager said most of the “kids” participating were 15 and 16 years old. 
He and Kaliner were on the older side, but still had a great time. 
“It was awesome,” Weiner said. 
“It was electric. 
All the fans were asking for baseballs. 
They were screaming at us, offering money. 
It was everything I imagined it would be.” 
The teenager chalked the fateful moment up to a faulty read. 
Weiner saw the pop-up going to center, and started jogging in that direction. 
“I was pretty confident I was going to get there,” he said. 
» READ MORE: Kyle Schwarber and his pitcher, Rafael Peña, did a ‘practice’ run in Detroit. 
It set the stage for an epic Home Run Derby. 
“But at the very last second, the ball kept traveling,” Weiner added. 
“And it happened again later in the night. 
The ball goes so much farther than how you see it. 
And I kind of lost it in the light. 
“I saw it, and then it kept going, so by the time it kept going, I was like, ‘Damn.’” 
Before long, Weiner became an internet celebrity. 
His brother, Wyatt, and dozens of friends from school sent him the clip. 
His parents saw it, too. 
They had slightly mixed reactions. 
“They loved it,” Weiner said. 
“They loved it. 
My dad was like, ‘Oh my god, you’re famous, this is awesome.’ 
“My mom is not a Phillies fan. 
She’s a Mets fan. 
And she was like, ‘I hate those Philly fans.’” 
When Weiner and Kaliner weren’t shagging, they were booing non-Phillies relentlessly, along with their Citizens Bank Park counterparts. 
This was not out of vindictiveness. 
Weiner said he always boos opponents at sporting events. 
In the 2023 NLDS, when Bryce Harper famously stared down Orlando Arcia, the brothers jeered the then-Braves shortstop “all game.” 
They also participated in the “We Want Strider” chants that same playoff series aimed at Braves pitcher Spencer Strider. 
He doesn’t see his viral moment as something to be ashamed of. 
When asked if he would’ve booed in the same situation, Weiner said he would  with a caveat. 
“Age 10 and over, you can boo,” he said.” 
If anything, it memorialized the night, for years to come. 
“I deserved those boos, but I liked it,” Weiner said. 
“Like, if I didn’t get those boos, I would’ve never remembered this.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.3%Alex Coffey: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Confirmation Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Alex Coffey: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 2.5%Availability Heuristic2.3%This article: 2.3%Alex Coffey: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic2.3%This article: 2.0%Alex Coffey: 1.0%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias2.0%This article: 2.0%Alex Coffey: 2.0%Inquirer.com: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias2.0%This article: 3.3%Alex Coffey: 1.9%Inquirer.com: 5.0%Framing Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Alex Coffey: 1.8%Inquirer.com: 2.7%Optimism Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Alex Coffey: 2.6%Inquirer.com: 5.7%Negativity Bias7.5%This article: 9.2%Alex Coffey: 3.5%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Alex Coffey: 4.7%Inquirer.com: 1.2%In-Group Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.3%Alex Coffey: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Recency Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 2.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 1.5%Alex Coffey: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 1.1%False Dilemma1.5%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.8%Alex Coffey: 2.7%Inquirer.com: 3.3%Hasty Generalization7.8%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 1.0%Alex Coffey: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Begging the Question1.0%This article: 3.2%Alex Coffey: 0.8%Inquirer.com: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.2%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.8%Alex Coffey: 0.5%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Anecdotal1.8%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.8%Alex Coffey: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.8%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.3%Alex Coffey: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Unattributed Quote1.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Coffey: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Alex Coffey: 1.7%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.8%

599 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker38%attributed speech374writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 8 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 8 words • 100.0% coverageReed Weiner • 11 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 5 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 3 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 7 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 7 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 12 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 8 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 11 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 9 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 5 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 3 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 12 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 7 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 4 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 10 words • 0.0% coverageReed Weiner • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Reed Weiner

63%flagged-word coverage
225 attributed words100% of attributed speech48% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.0 ptsWriter: 11.0%Reed Weiner: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+3.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Reed Weiner: 3.6%3.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.