Death by Telehealth 26%

By Tanya Lukyanova31%

7/15/2026, 1:33:03 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 52.1% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 379 faulty-reasoning hits from 169 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.6% and a BS Rank of 26% (16,378 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the article peer group.

Shortly after 5 a.m. on August 15, 2024, William Hylton stood at the foot of his son’s hospital bed, gently stroking his leg. 
Around him, the intensive care unit at Bridgeport Hospital Milford Campus had erupted into chaos. 
Nurses and doctors pumped on 26-year-old Conor Hylton’s chest, shouting instructions and working frantically to resuscitate him. 
A breathing tube protruded from his mouth. 
Dark, lumpy, blood-clotted vomit stained the sheets and pooled on the floor. 
“It’s just a very chaotic scene, as you can imagine,” William recalled. 
“You just want your child to survive. 
You start trying to make deals with God.” 
Across the hallway, William’s wife sat hunched over a trash can, sick with fear. 
Then, at 6:11 a.m., a doctor’s voice cut through the commotion. 
“Is his family there?” 
The voice came from a large monitor mounted on the wall. 
There, on-screen, was the physician directing the resuscitation efforts. 
He was 17 miles away, working from Yale New Haven Health’s headquarters in the tele-ICU hub. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.7%Tanya Lukyanova: 1.2%The FP: 5.8%Confirmation Bias4.7%This article: 9.5%Tanya Lukyanova: 2.4%The FP: 0.9%Anchoring Bias9.5%This article: 7.1%Tanya Lukyanova: 1.8%The FP: 4.1%Availability Heuristic7.1%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 1.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 1.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Tanya Lukyanova: 8.4%The FP: 9.5%Framing Effect11.2%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 1.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Tanya Lukyanova: 1.0%The FP: 1.6%Pessimism Bias4.1%This article: 36.1%Tanya Lukyanova: 21.3%The FP: 10.8%Negativity Bias36.1%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 1.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.5%Tanya Lukyanova: 1.6%The FP: 2.1%Recency Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 1.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 2.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 1.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.3%Tanya Lukyanova: 1.3%The FP: 3.2%Appeal to Authority5.3%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 2.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.4%The FP: 8.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 47.9%Tanya Lukyanova: 12.4%The FP: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion47.9%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.5%Tanya Lukyanova: 2.4%The FP: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.5%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.8%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.9%The FP: 3.2%Anecdotal1.8%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.5%Tanya Lukyanova: 2.4%The FP: 2.5%Unattributed Quote9.5%This article: 2.4%Tanya Lukyanova: 1.2%The FP: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection2.4%This article: 52.1%Tanya Lukyanova: 15.2%The FP: 15.0%Biased Writer Voice52.1%This article: 7.1%Tanya Lukyanova: 1.8%The FP: 2.8%Indoctrination7.1%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tanya Lukyanova: 0.0%The FP: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Tanya Lukyanova: 2.4%The FP: 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.5%

169 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker16%attributed speech142writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWilliam Hylton • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWilliam Hylton • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWilliam Hylton • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

William Hylton

100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words100% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.1 ptsWriter: 53.5%William Hylton: 44.4%44.4%Unattributed Quote+41.6 ptsWriter: 2.8%William Hylton: 44.4%44.4%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.3 ptsWriter: 11.3%William Hylton: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-8.5 ptsWriter: 8.5%William Hylton: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%William Hylton: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.