OutKick88%

Trans track athlete AB Hernandez's mom shares critical post of school officials over podium placements 34%

By Ryan Gaydos0%

5/19/2026, 10:23:43 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 1,207 faulty-reasoning hits from 563 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (14,129 of 21,197 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the article peer group.

The mother of California transgender track athlete AB Hernandez shared a post on social media slamming school officials for allowing biological female athletes to share a podium at state competitions. 
Hernandez, of Jurupa Valley High School, took first place in the long jump, high jump and triple jump at the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) Southern Section finals in Division 3 over the weekend. 
During the podium ceremonies, it was announced that each event had two co-champions based on a rule the high school sports governing body implemented last year. 
The trans athlete was absent from the first ceremony but later shared the top podium spot with Oak Park High School's Gwynneth Mureika. 
Hernandez was at the third ceremony, but co-champion Malia Strange, of Shadow Hills, was absent. 
Hernandez’s mother shared a post from Rainbow Families Action, criticizing CIF officials. 
"All these big tough ex-athletes at CIF, and the most courage they could muster was to hand this to coaches at AB’s meet today," the post read. 
"Not one of them was brave enough to look her or her mother in the eye and say ‘This whole project of violating Ed Code is aimed at you. 
A child.’" 
The post also called out the California Department of Education and state superintendent Tony Thurmond, adding "what are you going to do? 
Government sanctioned bullying of a kid?" 
Rainbow Families Action shared a note from CIF officials reminding parents that the CIF would allow biological females to share the podium with a trans athlete if the competition fell that way. 
The pilot program was put in place after Hernandez advanced to the state final, which prompted President Donald Trump to speak out against California and Gov. 
Gavin Newsom in a Truth Social post in the days leading up to the final. 
Hernandez, now a Southern Section champion again, along with all the other winners will move onto the CIF preliminaries next Saturday to face the rest of the state's top female jumpers, with a chance to get back to the state finals. 
The two-day state finals begin on May 29 in Clovis, California. 
The CIF enacted a pilot program for the state finals last May that awarded any female athlete that finished behind a trans athlete one higher spot, which resulted in girls sharing podium spots with Hernandez for the championship. 
The program also ensured any female athlete who finished one spot out of qualifying for the state finals in events that included a trans competitor, to compete for the title as well. 
Trump's Department of Justice then filed a Title IX lawsuit against the state's education agencies in July of last year, after Hernandez won two state titles and finished in second place in another. 
Hernandez then competed for Jurupa Valley's girls' volleyball team in the fall, as several teams forfeited to Jurupa Valley and two other players on the same team filed a Title IX lawsuit against the Jurupa Unified School District (JUSD) for putting the trans athlete on the girls' team and locker room. 
"The CIF values all our student-athletes, and we will continue to uphold our mission in providing students with the opportunity to belong, connect, and compete, while complying with California law and Education code," its note read. 
Fox News’ Jackson Thompson contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.5%Ryan Gaydos: 1.4%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias10.5%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.8%Ryan Gaydos: 2.5%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic15.8%This article: 4.1%Ryan Gaydos: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.1%This article: 4.6%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.3%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 21.8%Ryan Gaydos: 7.3%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect21.8%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.6%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.3%Ryan Gaydos: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 25.4%Ryan Gaydos: 11.0%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias25.4%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 4.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.3%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Ryan Gaydos: 2.5%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect6.4%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Ryan Gaydos: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%Ryan Gaydos: 1.1%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem9.9%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.4%Ryan Gaydos: 3.7%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority6.4%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 5.2%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 14.7%Ryan Gaydos: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring14.7%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 20.6%Ryan Gaydos: 7.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion20.6%This article: 1.1%Ryan Gaydos: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question1.1%This article: 10.5%Ryan Gaydos: 3.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.5%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 6.7%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division6.7%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.1%Ryan Gaydos: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.1%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 14.4%Ryan Gaydos: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote14.4%This article: 5.2%Ryan Gaydos: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection5.2%This article: 14.4%Ryan Gaydos: 4.5%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice14.4%This article: 6.2%Ryan Gaydos: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination6.2%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

563 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers31%attributed speech389writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageHernandez’s mother • 12 words • 0.0% coverageRainbow Families Action • 27 words • 100.0% coverageRainbow Families Action • 29 words • 100.0% coverageRainbow Families Action • 2 words • 100.0% coverageRainbow Families Action • 22 words • 100.0% coverageRainbow Families Action • 6 words • 100.0% coverageRainbow Families Action • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 0.0% coverageCIF • 36 words • 100.0% coverageFox News • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
118 attributed words68% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Unattributed Quote+35.5 ptsWriter: 7.7%Rainbow Families Action: 43.2%43.2%Indoctrination+29.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Rainbow Families Action: 29.7%29.7%Quote-first Misdirection+24.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Rainbow Families Action: 24.6%24.6%Biased Writer Voice-11.6 ptsWriter: 11.6%Rainbow Families Action: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.