Fox News89%

How American engineers unlocked the impossible beneath the Gulf of America 46%

By Erik Milito0%

6/30/2026, 9:00:12 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 44.5% saturation with 316 hits. Analysis detected 1,184 faulty-reasoning hits from 710 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.2% and a BS Rank of 46% (11,848 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the article peer group.

July 4th is more than marking America’s independence with patriotic flags, parades and fireworks. 
It's about celebrating American ingenuity, our firm belief that our country can engineer solutions to achieve the impossible, from launching the modern age of aviation to landing a man on the moon. 
Some of the most compelling evidence of American exceptionalism today is happening thousands of feet beneath the surface of the Gulf of America, where our offshore industry has spent more than a decade solving one of the hardest engineering problems in the history of energy. 
More than 100 miles offshore from the Gulf Coast sits a geological layer of sandstone and shale rock deep beneath the seabed called the Paleogene that holds tens of billions of barrels of oil. 
For years, most of it was considered unattainable. 
The reservoir pressures  up to 20,000 pounds per square inch, equivalent to an elephant standing on a quarter  exceeded anything existing technology could handle. 
No equipment had ever been built to work under those conditions. 
TRUMP’S ENERGY INITIATIVES MAY FINALLY EXTRACT AMERICA FROM MIDEAST CHAOS 
The solution was engineered here, in American waters, by the people who know them best. 
Transocean developed the first drillships in the world built to work in these high-pressure conditions. 
Their Deepwater Titan and Deepwater Atlas are currently operating in the Gulf of America. 
Trendsetter Engineering designed subsea systems and manifolds capable of operating reliably at pressures once considered beyond reach. 
Other offshore companies have developed similar equipment that has unlocked the Paleogene. 
The results speak for themselves. 
Chevron's Anchor project came online in 2024, representing roughly $5.7 billion in development spending. 
Beacon Offshore's Shenandoah is also producing oil and natural gas. 
BP's development plan for its $5 billion Kaskida project has secured federal approval and is moving toward first production. 
Together, these projects mark the opening of a new chapter of American offshore capability. 
The people who did this work aren't household names. 
They're engineers and subsea specialists and vessel crews spread across the Gulf Coast, part of a remarkable expertise that shows up when an impossible problem needs solving. 
And our people have proven this equipment is safe and reliable. 
Safety and containment systems were purpose-built, independently verified, and rigorously tested under federal oversight before a single well was drilled. 
Offshore consortiums HWCG and Marine Well Containment Co. 
(MWCC) both maintain 20,000 psi containment systems that can be deployed rapidly in the event of an incident. 
CONGRESS MUST NOT DERAIL THE FREIGHT RAIL LIFELINE FOR AMERICA’S FARMERS 
Federal regulations require operators to demonstrate access to containment resources, submit detailed response plans, and conduct robust recurring training exercises before drilling begins. 
The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement requires third-party certification on every major high-pressure component: blowout preventers, subsea trees, wellheads and completion equipment. 
Nothing goes offshore without it. 
This achievement that’s producing more American energy is worth celebrating today, especially during a time when we take stock of what this country is built on. 
The Paleogene wasn't unlocked by a single mandate or a government program. 
It was unlocked by an ecosystem of companies, engineers, regulators, suppliers and workers who collectively decided a problem was worth solving and spent years doing it. 
That's a distinctly American model, and it works. 
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION 
The Gulf of America supplies roughly 15% of U.S. oil production. 
Offshore projects support shipyards, manufacturers, ports, marine operators and skilled trades across the country. 
There are jobs and investments in all 50 states. 
The people who did this work aren't household names. 
They're engineers and subsea specialists and vessel crews spread across the Gulf Coast, part of a remarkable expertise that shows up when an impossible problem needs solving. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
The Paleogene represents the next chapter of that output, backed by existing infrastructure, an experienced workforce, and decades of hard-won operating knowledge. 
The economic and national security benefits don't happen without the long-term investment decisions and the long-term confidence that make them possible. 
At 250, America is still a country that does seemingly impossible things. 
The Paleogene in the Gulf of America is proof. 
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM ERIK MILITO 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.3%Erik Milito: 3.0%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 2.6%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Erik Milito: 3.3%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias7.3%This article: 4.9%Erik Milito: 4.9%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.6%Erik Milito: 5.4%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Erik Milito: 0.5%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 31.7%Erik Milito: 29.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias31.7%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Erik Milito: 4.6%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect6.3%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.5%Erik Milito: 3.6%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority1.5%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.8%Erik Milito: 6.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization16.8%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.8%Erik Milito: 3.9%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion11.8%This article: 0.7%Erik Milito: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.7%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 44.5%Erik Milito: 28.1%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice44.5%This article: 1.5%Erik Milito: 1.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination1.5%This article: 0.0%Erik Milito: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 23.9%Erik Milito: 10.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias23.9%This article: 3.2%Erik Milito: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.2%

710 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.