William Coe (Bill) Slocum Obituary 82%

By The Mercury News90%

7/19/2026, 7:05:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 77.2% saturation with 550 hits. Analysis detected 1,688 faulty-reasoning hits from 712 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 74% and a BS Rank of 82% (3,822 of 21,180 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.00% of the article peer group.

Our amazing Dad, William Coe (Bill) Slocum passed gently into heaven on a placid Sabbath morning in San Jose on Nov. 
30, 2025. 
Bearded and feisty, at last weary from long life but still full of love, he left nothing on the table or field of life. 
He was 100 years and four months old. 
Bill was born in 1925 in San Francisco to Sue and General LeCount Slocum. 
He attended Palo Alto High School, and earned a business degree from Stanford University and retained an unwavering passion for the institution, its standards and Stanford sports throughout his life. 
Even casual mention of University of California sports would alter his mood to the tune of face wrinkles and a touch of gas. 
He served proudly in the U.S. 
Army, and the annual Army-Navy football game was a thing to him, but nothing compared to the yearly Stanford-Cal Big Game event. 
Later, Bill sold cars, insurance, and then found his business bliss with real estate in the 1950s, 60s,70s and 80s, becoming a realtor, broker and developer and one of the most trusted and successful at his craft in the San Jose/Cambrian/Milpitas area. 
Colleagues, friends and clients often would marvel that he was perhaps the most honest and decent person they had ever met and dealt with. 
A velvet hammer type, he was tough but kind and empathetic, and always straightforward, genuine, and honest. 
His warm sense of humor was a thing of beauty. 
Bill married his wife Sally, a shockingly beautiful girl whom he suavely wooed out of Wisconsin in 1948, and the pair raised four cool kids. 
Bill's life was based firmly on his love of God. 
He was a devout Christian, a long-time member of Presbyterian Church of Los Gatos, and earlier, a long-time member of Calvin Presbyterian Church. 
He loved all sports, but golf was a particular passion, and he was able to play many of the great courses in our country and overseas. 
He was good at the game, not great, but uncannily nailed a hole-in-one FOUR times. 
In a weak moment, he once did admit, "Yeah, but one of them was a cheapie, a ground ball that I skulled. 
No idea how it found the hole. 
Sort of like the scenic route on a bad road." 
He was incredibly proud of his family, loving his wife, three boys and daughter dearly and unconditionally. 
He also loved the Giants and 49ers, and almost never missed a Stanford home football game. 
He taught his boys how to throw a football, catch passes, play golf, hit a baseball, pitch horseshoes, play ping-pong and even croquet. 
And there always was a basketball hoop and sturdy backboard above the garage at home. 
Bill was able to retire in his early 50s thanks to his real estate and property investments savvy and travel the world with Sally. 
He lived an uncommonly full life of love, faith, good health and success, deftly sloughing off periodic setbacks as though they were an annoying gnat. 
He died very peacefully at home, where he insisted on staying until the end, surrounded by his kids and Christian music playing softly in the background. 
He loved the hymn "Stand Up for Jesus", and often, when the spirit moved him, he would just begin belting it out with emotion, with an improbably good voice for one flirting with his 100th year. 
And so, almost certainly and fittingly, when our Dad took his last breath, Jesus Himself stood up to greet him with the incomparable warmth of a Holy Hug, and possibly a high-five, welcoming him to Eternal Life. 
Bill is survived by his sons Bob and Steve, and daughter Kristi; grandchildren Jennifer, Joshuah, Chloe, Amy Grace, David, Daniel, Abbey Rose; and great grandson Theo. 
He is predeceased by eldest son Bill, and amazing wife of 74 years, Sally. 
Dad... 
Steve and Kristi and I miss you and love you and thank you so much for all you, and Mom, gave to us all of these years. 
You were an unspeakable gift. 
We celebrate you with our hearts and gratitude and will see you again. 
A celebration of Bill's life will be held Saturday, July 25, 2026, at Presbyterian Church of Los Gatos at 2 p.m. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.6%The Mercury News: 1.0%East Bay Times: 3.0%Confirmation Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.5%The Mercury News: 2.0%East Bay Times: 2.6%Availability Heuristic11.5%This article: 3.1%The Mercury News: 0.9%East Bay Times: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic3.1%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%The Mercury News: 0.9%East Bay Times: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.4%East Bay Times: 3.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.0%The Mercury News: 4.5%East Bay Times: 1.9%Optimism Bias9.0%This article: 5.2%The Mercury News: 0.9%East Bay Times: 1.3%Pessimism Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 1.1%East Bay Times: 8.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%The Mercury News: 0.4%East Bay Times: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%The Mercury News: 1.5%East Bay Times: 0.8%In-Group Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 39.6%The Mercury News: 41.5%East Bay Times: 7.1%Halo Effect39.6%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.7%East Bay Times: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%The Mercury News: 1.3%East Bay Times: 0.4%Primacy Effect6.3%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.9%The Mercury News: 3.4%East Bay Times: 2.6%Appeal to Authority5.9%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 5.5%East Bay Times: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 21.8%The Mercury News: 14.8%East Bay Times: 5.0%Appeal to Emotion21.8%This article: 8.4%The Mercury News: 1.0%East Bay Times: 0.6%Begging the Question8.4%This article: 3.4%The Mercury News: 2.2%East Bay Times: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.4%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.4%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.0%The Mercury News: 4.4%East Bay Times: 2.2%Anecdotal9.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 2.6%East Bay Times: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.1%The Mercury News: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.9%Unattributed Quote3.1%This article: 3.1%The Mercury News: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection3.1%This article: 77.2%The Mercury News: 39.3%East Bay Times: 7.6%Biased Writer Voice77.2%This article: 13.5%The Mercury News: 1.8%East Bay Times: 2.8%Indoctrination13.5%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 1.3%East Bay Times: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

712 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker5.5%attributed speech673writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageBill • 22 words • 100.0% coverageBill • 7 words • 0.0% coverageBill • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bill

56%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words100% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Biased Writer Voice-81.7 ptsWriter: 81.7%Bill: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+56.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Bill: 56.4%56.4%Quote-first Misdirection+56.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Bill: 56.4%56.4%Indoctrination-14.3 ptsWriter: 14.3%Bill: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.